What is Camden Police Department's police report card grade?

Camden Police Department receives a grade of F on this site, meaning its reported internal affairs volume and discipline severity place it in the 82nd percentile of its peer group (municipal police agencies, 60+ officers). The grade is analysis, not an official rating, and a higher volume can reflect more misconduct or a stronger reporting culture.

How is the report-card grade calculated?

The grade combines three components, each ranked within a peer group of the same agency type and size: internal affairs volume per officer (40%), sanction-weighted discipline severity (40%), and mean allegation severity (20%). The combined standing is re-ranked among peers, and the grade is the fifth of the peer group it falls in. Full method and weights are on the methodology page.

Report card

Camden Police Department

AnalysisA grade is interpretation, not a record. The records behind it stay one click away.

Grade F: Highest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (14 agencies)
Combined standing: 82nd percentile of peers
Confidence: High confidence

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group (higher = more reported volume or severity). The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in. Weights are an editorial choice, published on the methodology page.

IA volumeweight 40%

96th

334.1 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

18th

23.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

82nd

2.28 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

Volume trend

Internal affairs investigations per 100 officers at Camden Police Department, by year
2021	2022	2023	2024	2025
260.9	303.7	352	370.9	383.3

Investigations per 100 reported officers, per year.^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]

The inputs, on the record

Sworn officers, 2025

390^{^[1]}

IA investigations, 2025

1,495^{^[1]}

Major discipline records

All years, 2020-2025

Terminations

All years, 2020-2025

Internal affairs investigations per 100 officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 sworn officers)
Camden PD	383.3
County median, municipal police (34)	142.2
NJ median, municipal police (447)	125.6

What this grade can and can't tell you

The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
There is no arrest, population, or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate.
A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
The grade is one lens. Weights are a transparent editorial choice on the methodology page, and the records are always one click away.

See the underlying records

Questions and answers

What is Camden Police Department's police report card grade?: Camden Police Department receives a grade of F on this site, meaning its reported internal affairs volume and discipline severity place it in the 82nd percentile of its peer group (municipal police agencies, 60+ officers). The grade is analysis, not an official rating, and a higher volume can reflect more misconduct or a stronger reporting culture.
How is the report-card grade calculated?: The grade combines three components, each ranked within a peer group of the same agency type and size: internal affairs volume per officer (40%), sanction-weighted discipline severity (40%), and mean allegation severity (20%). The combined standing is re-ranked among peers, and the grade is the fifth of the peer group it falls in. Full method and weights are on the methodology page.

Sources

[1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2162. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[2]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 130. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[3]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1146. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[4]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1658. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 638. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2162. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩