Report cards
Department report cards
Standing relative to peer agencies, never an absolute verdict. A grade is the fifth of its peer group a department's reported internal affairs volume and discipline severity fall in: A is the lowest fifth, F the highest. The full method, including its limits, is on the methodology page.
How the grades fall
All graded agencies
Counts of agencies (n=540 graded)
| Grade | Agencies |
|---|---|
| Grade A, lowest fifth | 108 |
| Grade B, below median | 107 |
| Grade C, middle | 110 |
| Grade D, above median | 107 |
| Grade F, highest fifth | 108 |
A · Lowest fifthB · Below medianC · MiddleD · Above medianF · Highest fifth
Each segment's width is its share of the 540 graded against peers of the same type and size. 8 more are not graded (too few peers or too little reported data).
A grade tells you where an agency sits among its peers. It does not tell you whether the peer group itself is doing well.
Highlight by grade
548 of 548 agencies
Applies to every table below. Nothing is filtered out: agencies outside the selected grade recede but stay on the page, linked and readable.
FewerMore
Shading on Major discipline uses each agency's discipline-severity percentile within its own report-card peer group (type and size band), so a cell is only shaded against agencies of the same type and size. Not a second grade; the Grade column is the grade.
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absecon City Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (94th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Atlantic City Police Department | Municipal police | 36 (78th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Atlantic County Corrections | Corrections | 127 (96th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Atlantic County Sheriff's Office | County sheriff | 4 (45th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 10 (98th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Brigantine Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (94th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Egg Harbor City Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Egg Harbor Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (58th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Galloway Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (30th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Hamilton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 6 (69th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Hammonton Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Linwood City Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (77th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Longport Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (100th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Margate Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Mullica Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (55th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Northfield Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Pleasantville Police Department | Municipal police | 6 (83rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Somers Point Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (54th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Stockton University | Other agency | 0 | not graded |
| Ventnor Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (39th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allendale Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (69th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Alpine Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office | County prosecutor | 3 (64th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Bergen County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 47 (55th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Bergenfield Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (86th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Bogota Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (64th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Carlstadt Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (63rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Cliffside Park Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (48th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Closter Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Cresskill Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Demarest Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (66th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Dumont Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (77th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| East Rutherford Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Edgewater Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Elmwood Park Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (45th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Emerson Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Englewood Cliffs Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Englewood Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (83rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Fair Lawn Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (2nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Fairview Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Fort Lee Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (5th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Franklin Lakes Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Garfield Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (82nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Glen Rock Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Hackensack Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (18th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Harrington Park Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (86th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Hasbrouck Heights Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Haworth Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Hillsdale Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (92nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Ho-Ho-Kus Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (68th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Leonia Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Little Ferry Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (63rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Lodi Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (68th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Lyndhurst Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (49th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Mahwah Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Maywood Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Midland Park Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Montvale Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Moonachie Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| New Milford Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (44th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| North Arlington Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (89th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Northvale Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (93rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Norwood Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Oakland Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (93rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Old Tappan Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Oradell Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (80th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Palisades Interstate Parkway Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Palisades Park Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (62nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Paramus Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (38th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Park Ridge Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Ramsey Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (95th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Ridgefield Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (80th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Ridgefield Park Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (82nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Ridgewood Village Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (50th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| River Edge Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (61st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| River Vale Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Rochelle Park Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (51st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Rutherford Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (32nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Saddle Brook Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (70th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Saddle River Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (94th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| South Hackensack Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Teaneck Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (9th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Tenafly Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (91st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Upper Saddle River Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Waldwick Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Wallington Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Washington Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Westwood Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (80th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Wood-Ridge Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Woodcliff Lake Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Wyckoff Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beverly City Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Bordentown City Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (89th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Bordentown Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (66th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Burlington City Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (38th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Burlington County Corrections | Corrections | 52 (89th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Burlington County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 3 (79th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Burlington County Bridge Commission | County agency | 0 | not graded |
| Burlington County Sheriff's Office | County sheriff | 2 (40th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Burlington Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Chesterfield Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Cinnaminson Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (79th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Delanco Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Delran Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (70th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Eastampton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Edgewater Park Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (58th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Evesham Township Police Department | Municipal police | 8 (69th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Florence Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (36th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Lumberton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (96th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Mansfield Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Maple Shade Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (54th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Medford Lakes Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Medford Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Moorestown Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (90th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Mount Holly Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (97th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Mount Laurel Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (53rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| New Hanover Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (95th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| North Hanover Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Palmyra Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (78th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Pemberton Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Pemberton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (40th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Riverside Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (82nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Riverton Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Springfield Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (82nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Westampton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (52nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Willingboro Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (31st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audubon Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (62nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Barrington Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Bellmawr Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Berlin Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (76th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Berlin Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Brooklawn Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (72nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Camden County Corrections | Corrections | 333 (82nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Camden County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 0 (12th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Camden County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 14 (64th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Camden Police Department | Municipal police | 49 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Cherry Hill Board of Education | Other agency | 0 | not graded |
| Cherry Hill Campus Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Cherry Hill Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (2nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Chesilhurst Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Clementon Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Collingswood Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (61st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Delaware River Port Authority | Other agency | 13 | not graded |
| Gibbsboro Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Gloucester City Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Gloucester Township Police Department | Municipal police | 11 (50th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Haddon Heights Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Haddon Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Haddonfield Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Hi-Nella Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Laurel Springs Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Lawnside Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Lindenwold Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (70th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Magnolia Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Merchantville Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Mount Ephraim Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Oaklyn Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Pennsauken Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (28th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Pine Hill Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (74th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Runnemede Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Somerdale Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Stratford Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Voorhees Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (71st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Waterford Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (72nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Winslow Township Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Woodlynne Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (79th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Cape May City Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (79th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Cape May County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 2 (88th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Cape May County Sheriff's Office | County sheriff | 21 (98th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Cape May County Correctional Center | Corrections | 0 (4th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Lower Township Police Department | Municipal police | 8 (97th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Middle Township Police Department | Municipal police | 8 (80th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| North Wildwood City Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Ocean City Police Department | Municipal police | 9 (98th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Sea Isle City Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (89th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Stone Harbor Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| West Wildwood Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Wildwood Crest Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Wildwood Police Department | Municipal police | 9 (84th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgeton Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (16th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Cumberland County Corrections | Corrections | 10 (39th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Cumberland County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 2 (55th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Cumberland County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 4 (36th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Millville Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (41st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Vineland Police Department | Municipal police | 13 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belleville Police Department | Municipal police | 11 (89th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Bloomfield Police Department | Municipal police | 11 (47th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Caldwell Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Cedar Grove Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| East Orange Police Department | Municipal police | 11 (24th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Essex County Corrections | Corrections | 62 (61st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Essex County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 1 (31st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Essex County Sheriff's Office | County sheriff | 9 (21st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Essex County College Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Essex Fells Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Fairfield Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (40th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Glen Ridge Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Irvington Police Department | Municipal police | 14 (40th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Livingston Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (7th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Maplewood Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (13th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Millburn Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Montclair Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (63rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Montclair State University Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| New Jersey Institute Of Technology | Other agency | 5 | not graded |
| Newark Police Department | Municipal police | 87 (45th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| North Caldwell Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Nutley Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (10th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Orange Police Department | Municipal police | 12 (64th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Roseland Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| South Orange Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (55th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Verona Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| West Caldwell Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| West Orange Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (20th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (99th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Deptford Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (76th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| East Greenwich Township Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (93rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Elk Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Franklin Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (37th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Glassboro Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (51st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Gloucester County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 1 (36th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Gloucester County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 8 (74th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Greenwich Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Harrison Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (73rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Logan Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Mantua Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (92nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Monroe Township Police Department | Municipal police | 12 (94th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Paulsboro Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (81st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Pitman Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Rowan University Of New Jersey | Other agency | 0 | not graded |
| Washington Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| West Deptford Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (74th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Westville Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Woodbury City Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Woodbury Heights Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Woolwich Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (99th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bayonne Police Department | Municipal police | 10 (46th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| East Newark Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (89th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Guttenberg Police Department | Municipal police | 9 (87th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Harrison Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (35th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Hoboken Police Department | Municipal police | 19 (67th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Hudson County Corrections | Corrections | 38 (46th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Hudson County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 3 (69th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Hudson County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 20 (69th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Jersey City Police Department | Municipal police | 92 (80th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Kearny Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (22nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| North Bergen Police Department | Municipal police | 10 (60th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Secaucus Police Department | Municipal police | 8 (95th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Stevens Institute Of Technology Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Union City Police Department | Municipal police | 19 (92nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Weehawken Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (42nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| West New York Police Department | Municipal police | 6 (48th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinton Town Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Clinton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 12 (99th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Delaware Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Flemington Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Franklin Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (76th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Frenchtown Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| High Bridge Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Holland Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Hunterdon County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 0 (12th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Hunterdon County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 0 (10th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Lambertville City Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Lebanon Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Raritan Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (53rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Readington Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Tewksbury Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| West Amwell Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| College Of New Jersey Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| East Windsor Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (64th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Ewing Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (8th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Hamilton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (36th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Hightstown Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Hopewell Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (92nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Lawrence Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (61st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Mercer County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 3 (93rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Mercer County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 4 (60th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Pennington Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (77th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Princeton Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Princeton University Police | Municipal police | 9 (98th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Robbinsville Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (52nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Trenton Police Department | Municipal police | 44 (93rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| West Windsor Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (64th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carteret Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (2nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Cranbury Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Dunellen Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (97th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| East Brunswick Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (32nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Edison Township Police Department | Municipal police | 6 (39th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Highland Park Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (57th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Jamesburg Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Metuchen Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Middlesex Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (78th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Middlesex County College Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Middlesex County Corrections | Corrections | 36 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 1 (45th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Middlesex County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 18 (88th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Milltown Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (60th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Monroe Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (35th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| New Brunswick Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (27th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| North Brunswick Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (54th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Old Bridge Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (88th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Perth Amboy Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (6th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Piscataway Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (11th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Plainsboro Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (90th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Sayreville Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (52nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| South Amboy Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| South Brunswick Township Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (55th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| South Plainfield Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (37th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| South River Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (62nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Spotswood Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Woodbridge Township Police Department | Municipal police | 14 (70th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aberdeen Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (59th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Allenhurst Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (74th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Allentown Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Asbury Park Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (56th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Atlantic Highlands Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Avon-By-The-Sea Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Belmar Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Bradley Beach Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (69th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Brielle Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (98th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Brookdale College Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Colts Neck Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Deal Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (95th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Eatontown Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Englishtown Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (81st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Fair Haven Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Freehold Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Freehold Township Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (99th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Hazlet Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Highlands Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (69th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Holmdel Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (46th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Howell Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (79th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Keansburg Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (73rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Keyport Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Little Silver Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Long Branch Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (73rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Manalapan Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (74th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Manasquan Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (65th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Marlboro Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (59th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Matawan Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (55th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Middletown Police Department | Municipal police | 10 (96th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Monmouth Beach Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Monmouth County Corrections | Corrections | 47 (68th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 0 (12th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Monmouth County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 8 (83rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Monmouth University Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Neptune City Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (77th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Neptune Township Police Department | Municipal police | 6 (62nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Ocean Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (2nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Oceanport Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (59th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Red Bank Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (58th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Rumson Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (96th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Sea Bright Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (97th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Sea Girt Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (91st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Shrewsbury Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Spring Lake Heights Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Spring Lake Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Tinton Falls Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (43rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Union Beach Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Wall Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (33rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| West Long Branch Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (83rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boonton Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Boonton Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Butler Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Chatham Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Chatham Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (65th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Chester Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Denville Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Dover Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (46th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| East Hanover Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (100th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Florham Park Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (87th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Hanover Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (76th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Harding Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Jefferson Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Kinnelon Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Lincoln Park Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (72nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Long Hill Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (88th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Madison Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Mendham Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Mendham Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Montville Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Morris County Corrections | Corrections | 11 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Morris County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 1 (26th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Morris County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 2 (31st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Morris County Park Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Morris Plains Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (58th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Morris Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (31st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Morristown Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (30th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Mount Arlington Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (54th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Mount Olive Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Mountain Lakes Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Netcong Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Parsippany-Troy Hills Police Department | Municipal police | 11 (84th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Pequannock Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Randolph Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (49th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Riverdale Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Rockaway Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Rockaway Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Roxbury Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Washington Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Wharton Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barnegat Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (42nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Bayhead Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Beach Haven Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (80th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Beachwood Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Berkeley Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (72nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Brick Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (19th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Harvey Cedars Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Island Heights Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (84th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Jackson Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (17th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Lacey Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (57th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Lakehurst Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Lakewood Police Department | Municipal police | 9 (81st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Lavallette Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (73rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Little Egg Harbor Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (87th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Long Beach Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (41st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Manchester Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (90th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Mantoloking Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Ocean County Corrections | Corrections | 6 (18th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Ocean County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 3 (83rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Ocean County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 0 (10th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Ocean Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Oceangate Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Pine Beach Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (94th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Plumsted Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (70th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Point Pleasant Beach Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (84th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Point Pleasant Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (64th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Seaside Heights Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Seaside Park Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Ship Bottom Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| South Toms River Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (92nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Stafford Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (77th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Surf City Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Toms River Township | Other agency | 1 | not graded |
| Tuckerton Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloomingdale Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (67th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Clifton Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Haledon Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Hawthorne Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Little Falls Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (56th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| North Haledon Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Passaic County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 1 (50th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Passaic County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 24 (79th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Passaic Police Department | Municipal police | 9 (49th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Paterson Police Department | Municipal police | 17 (26th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Pompton Lakes Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (87th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Prospect Park Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Ringwood Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Totowa Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (62nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Wanaque Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (70th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Wayne Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (12th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| West Milford Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (78th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| William Paterson University Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Woodland Park Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (82nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carneys Point Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Elmer Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Lower Alloways Creek Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (96th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Penns Grove Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Pennsville Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Salem City Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (56th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Salem County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 1 (60th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Salem County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 3 (93rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Salem County Correctional Facility | Corrections | 14 | not graded |
| Woodstown Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bedminster Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Bernards Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (96th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Bernardsville Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Bound Brook Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Branchburg Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (59th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Bridgewater Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (66th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Far Hills Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Franklin Township Police Department | Municipal police | 13 (91st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Green Brook Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Hillsborough Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Manville Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (90th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Montgomery Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| North Plainfield Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (93rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Peapack-Gladstone Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Raritan Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (79th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Somerset County Corrections | Corrections | 5 (11th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Somerset County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 2 (74th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Somerset County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 3 (50th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Somerville Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| South Bound Brook Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (86th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Warren Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Watchung Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (67th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andover Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Byram Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (71st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Franklin Borough Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (83rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Hamburg Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (88th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Hardyston Township Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (100th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Hopatcong Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Newton Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Ogdensburg Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (83rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Sparta Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (53rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Stanhope Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (97th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Sussex County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 0 (12th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Sussex County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 0 (10th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Vernon Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (73rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Heights Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (56th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Clark Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Cranford Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Elizabeth Police Department | Municipal police | 16 (44th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Fanwood Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (90th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Garwood Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (90th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Hillside Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (97th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Kean University Police Department | Municipal police | 5 (91st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Kenilworth Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Linden Police Department | Municipal police | 18 (87th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Mountainside Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (82nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| New Providence Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (73rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Plainfield Police Department | Municipal police | 10 (68th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Rahway Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (23rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Roselle Park Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (15th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Roselle Police Department | Municipal police | 7 (67th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Scotch Plains Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (60th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Springfield Township Police Department | Municipal police | 2 (66th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Summit Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Union County Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (51st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Union County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 2 (40th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Union County Sheriff's Office | County sheriff | 5 (26th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| Union Township Police Department | Municipal police | 4 (21st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Westfield Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (65th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 60+ officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Winfield Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belvidere Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Blairstown Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Greenwich Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (71st percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Hackettstown Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Independence Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Lopatcong Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Mansfield Township Police Department | Municipal police | 0 (34th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| Phillipsburg Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (60th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 30-59 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Pohatcong Police Department | Municipal police | 3 (99th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 1-14 officers) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Warren County Corrections | Corrections | 1 (32nd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Warren County Prosecutor's Office | County prosecutor | 0 (12th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all prosecutor agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Warren County Sheriff's Department | County sheriff | 0 (10th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all sheriff agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Washington Township Police Department | Municipal police | 1 (53rd percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, 15-29 officers) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
State & other agencies
| Agency | Type | Major disciplinerecords, 2020-2025 | Gradepeer-group fifth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware River and Bay Authority Police Department | State agency | 0 (10th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| Department Of Corrections | Corrections | 577 (54th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all corrections agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| New Jersey State Police | State agency | 106 (35th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| New Jersey Transit Police | State agency | 6 (25th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| New Jersey Department Of Human Services | State agency | 7 (65th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | CMiddle fifth of peers |
| New Jersey Division Criminal Justice - Trenton | State agency | 4 (75th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | BSecond-lowest fifth |
| New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife | State agency | 0 (10th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | ALowest fifth of peers |
| New Jersey State Parole Board | State agency | 29 (95th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Park Police | State agency | 4 (85th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | DSecond-highest fifth |
| Rutgers University Police Department | State agency | 8 (45th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |
| Youth Justice Commission | State agency | 26 (55th percentile for discipline severity among its report-card peer group, all state agencies) | FHighest fifth of peers |