Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Cumberland County

Bridgeton Police Department

Reported as: Bridgeton PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Bridgeton on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

Radio encryption

Bridgeton Police Department encrypts its radio communications (P25 AES-256, all operations), according to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, as of 2026-03-06 (verified).

AnalysisThis site treats radio encryption as a meaningful transparency signal. When a department closes its radio traffic to the public, the public loses a real-time window into how it operates. That is context for reading the discipline and internal affairs records on this page, not a figure drawn from them.

In brief

Bridgeton Police Department, a municipal police agency in Cumberland County, recorded 65 internal affairs investigations in 2025 and named 35 officers in those cases. The rate of 185.7 per 100 officers ran ahead of the Cumberland County median of 181.8 and well ahead of the 125.9 municipal median statewide. A rate that high can reflect more misconduct or a department that opens and records more of the complaints it receives. Of the 65 investigations detailed for 2025, 24 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, followed by Attendance Issues and Differential Treatment.

Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2024 and 2025. Bridgeton received a C on the report card, at the 45th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

35[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

65[1]

Incidents, 2025

38[1]

Major discipline records

2

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

62[7]

65 years reported

62 sworn officers in 2025, up from 32 in 1960 (+94%).
Yearsworn officers
196032
1961not reported
196234
196333
196429
196532
196630
196734
196837
196938
197043
197145
197245
197341
197451
197554
197651
197752
197847
197954
198057
198153
198253
198356
198453
198550
198655
198749
198851
198955
199057
199157
199257
199359
199459
199563
199665
199766
199865
199966
200067
200166
200266
200360
200471
200572
200667
200762
200864
200964
201063
201163
201265
201362
201463
201564
201660
201765
201866
201961
202061
202164
202264
202362
202462
202562

Civilian employees, 2025

13[8]

0.21 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

6[9]

9.7% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.22[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Bridgeton Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–20084
200–4005
400–6001
600–8001
800–10000
1000–12001

Bridgeton Police Department: 62 sworn officers: 6th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 53 active Bridgeton Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$78,723[2]

53 active officers

Median local school staff

$81,660

BRIDGETON BD OF ED, 542 TPAF members

Against the local district

0.96x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.01x

Median officer to Cumberland County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "BRIDGETON BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Cumberland County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
202144
202256
202365
202445
202565

Incidents

38 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202137
202242
202340
202430
202538

Officers on IA rows

62 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202445
202562
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202251.786
202329.231
202457.778
202536.923

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 62 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Bridgeton Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation16
Attendance Issues13
Differential Treatment12
Demeanor8
Excessive Force6
Preventable MV Accident5
Neglect of Duty1
Use Of Force Policy Violation1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Attendance Issues · Differential Treatment · Demeanor · Excessive Force · Preventable MV Accident · Neglect of Duty · Use Of Force Policy Violation

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Bridgeton Police Department, 2025
Unfounded28
Sustained24
not provided7
Exonerated4
Not Sustained2

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

89 of 275

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202131
202219
202322
20241
202516

not provided

33 of 275

not provided allegations reported by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20222
20230
202431
20250

Demeanor

32 of 275

Demeanor allegations reported by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202110
20225
20235
20244
20258

Differential Treatment

27 of 275

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20221
20239
20242
202512

Other (16 categories)

94 of 275

Other (16 categories) allegations reported by Bridgeton Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
202229
202329
20247
202529

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Bridgeton Police Department185.7
County median, municipal police (3)181.8
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

65 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 62 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 104.8 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade C: Middle fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
45th percentile of 93 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Bridgeton Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–5066
50–10025
100–1501
150–2001

Bridgeton Police Department: 11.976 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 16th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

90th percentileof 93 peers

164.1 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

16th percentileof 93 peers

12.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

30th percentileof 93 peers

1.85 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025185.735th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20256527th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20253839th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20252127th of 282 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.22265th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.01x365th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present3657th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20220
20230
20241
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Bridgeton Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Keristan LoweSergeantSuspended 180 days[24]
2024Zachary JoycePatrol OfficerSuspended 10 days[25]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

Five records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Bridgeton Police Department, spanning 2003 through 2017. The force labels, as recorded by the project, are Gunshot in four, and Drowned in one. Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced journalism project that documented deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, deaths in police presence, and medical emergencies. A record is not a finding of fault against the agency or any officer, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records elsewhere on this page. The project stopped collecting in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen and nothing after that date appears here.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[3] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Bridgeton Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

  • Darryl L. Fuqua

    February 10, 2017 · Bridgeton · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

  • Jerame C. Reid

    December 30, 2014 · Bridgeton · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

  • German Sanabria

    February 13, 2008 · Bridgeton · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

  • Hector Rodriguez

    May 8, 2005 · Bridgeton · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

  • Kevin Jenkins

    July 15, 2003 · Bridgeton · Highest level of force as recorded: Drowned

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Bridgeton City, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 36 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 98 filed to Bridgeton City are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

36[4]

Identified by subject line, of 134 filed to Bridgeton City

Most recent request

November 2025[4]

First recorded November 2017

Awaiting a response

24[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Bridgeton City (requests)
Awaiting agency response24
Requester reported success6
Request refused3
Requester reported partial success2
Agency said records not held1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Bridgeton City, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-11-30Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-08-16Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-06-20Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-04-30Awaiting agency response
  6. 2025-04-29Awaiting agency response
  7. 2025-03-01Requester reported success
  8. 2024-11-25Awaiting agency response
  9. 2024-10-26Awaiting agency response
  10. 2024-09-28Requester reported partial success
  11. 2024-09-21Awaiting agency response
  12. 2024-08-27Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Bridgeton City on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Bridgeton City are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Bridgeton Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Bridgeton Police Department, a municipal police agency in Cumberland County, recorded 65 internal affairs investigations in 2025 and named 35 officers in those cases. The rate of 185.7 per 100 officers ran ahead of the Cumberland County median of 181.8 and well ahead of the 125.9 municipal median statewide. A rate that high can reflect more misconduct or a department that opens and records more of the complaints it receives. Of the 65 investigations detailed for 2025, 24 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, followed by Attendance Issues and Differential Treatment. Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2024 and 2025. Bridgeton received a C on the report card, at the 45th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Bridgeton Police Department report in 2025?

Bridgeton Police Department reported 65 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 35 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Bridgeton Police Department have?

Bridgeton Police Department has 2 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

Does Bridgeton Police Department encrypt its radio communications?

According to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, Bridgeton Police Department encrypts all of its radio communications (P25 AES-256), as recorded on 2026-03-06. This site treats radio encryption as a transparency signal, which is analysis, not a figure from the discipline data.

How many officers does Bridgeton Police Department have?

Bridgeton Police Department reported 62 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 9.7% of them female. That is 2.22 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Bridgeton Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 5 records naming Bridgeton Police Department, from 2003 through 2017. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Bridgeton Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 53 active Bridgeton Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $78,723. The median for the 542 TPAF-enrolled staff at BRIDGETON BD OF ED is $81,660, a ratio of 0.96x. Against the Cumberland County school-staff median the ratio is 1.01x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2203. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  3. [3]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Bridgeton City. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Bridgeton PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8281. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8281. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8281. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8281. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 173. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1189. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1698. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 679. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2203. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bridgeton PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bridgeton PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bridgeton PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bridgeton PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bridgeton PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bridgeton PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8281. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 266. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1043. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩