Department profile · Bergen County
Park Ridge Police Department
Reported as: Park Ridge PDMunicipal police
Jurisdiction context
Civil service jurisdiction
Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Park Ridge Borough on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.
Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.
Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.
In brief
Park Ridge Police Department, a municipal agency in Bergen County, recorded 7 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 5 officers named in those cases. Its rate of 140 per 100 officers sat above the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 municipal median. Heavier internal affairs volume is ambiguous. It can signal more misconduct, or a department that logs complaints others would leave undocumented. None of the 7 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Differential Treatment led the allegation categories, ahead of Improper Search and Demeanor.
No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Park Ridge PD received a B on the report card, at the 38th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.
Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.
Officers named in IA cases, 2025
5[1]
Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing
IA investigations, 2025
7[1]
Incidents, 2025
4[1]
Major discipline records
0
All years, 2020-2025
Staffing
As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.
Sworn officers, 2025
21[6]
65 years reported
| Year | sworn officers |
|---|---|
| 1960 | 8 |
| 1961 | 8 |
| 1962 | 9 |
| 1963 | not reported |
| 1964 | 10 |
| 1965 | 11 |
| 1966 | 12 |
| 1967 | 13 |
| 1968 | 15 |
| 1969 | 15 |
| 1970 | 15 |
| 1971 | 16 |
| 1972 | 17 |
| 1973 | 17 |
| 1974 | 18 |
| 1975 | 18 |
| 1976 | 18 |
| 1977 | 18 |
| 1978 | 18 |
| 1979 | 19 |
| 1980 | 19 |
| 1981 | 19 |
| 1982 | 19 |
| 1983 | 19 |
| 1984 | 19 |
| 1985 | 18 |
| 1986 | 17 |
| 1987 | 19 |
| 1988 | 19 |
| 1989 | 19 |
| 1990 | 19 |
| 1991 | 19 |
| 1992 | 18 |
| 1993 | 18 |
| 1994 | 19 |
| 1995 | 20 |
| 1996 | 18 |
| 1997 | 18 |
| 1998 | 18 |
| 1999 | 18 |
| 2000 | 18 |
| 2001 | 18 |
| 2002 | 18 |
| 2003 | 18 |
| 2004 | 17 |
| 2005 | 18 |
| 2006 | 18 |
| 2007 | 18 |
| 2008 | 18 |
| 2009 | 17 |
| 2010 | 17 |
| 2011 | 17 |
| 2012 | 17 |
| 2013 | 17 |
| 2014 | 18 |
| 2015 | 19 |
| 2016 | 19 |
| 2017 | 19 |
| 2018 | 20 |
| 2019 | 19 |
| 2020 | 20 |
| 2021 | 20 |
| 2022 | 20 |
| 2023 | 20 |
| 2024 | 20 |
| 2025 | 21 |
How Park Ridge Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.
Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)
| Range | Agencies |
|---|---|
| 14–16 | 17 |
| 16–18 | 20 |
| 18–20 | 27 |
| 20–22 | 16 |
| 22–24 | 26 |
| 24–26 | 24 |
| 26–28 | 17 |
| 28–30 | 19 |
Park Ridge Police Department: 21 sworn officers: 46th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).
The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.
Officer pay and school-staff pay
County comparisonA separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 21 active Park Ridge Police Department officers in the file.
Median local school staff
$97,057
PARK RIDGE BORO BD OF ED, 158 TPAF members
Against the local district
1.61x
Median officer to median local school staff
Against the county
1.71x
Median officer to Bergen County school-staff median
Military surplus equipment (1033 program)
No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.
Internal affairs investigations by year
counts
| Category | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 |
| 2022 | 5 |
| 2023 | 7 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 7 |
Incidents
4 in 2025
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2023 | 6 |
| 2024 | 3 |
| 2025 | 4 |
Officers on IA rows
7 in 2025
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | not reported |
| 2022 | not reported |
| 2023 | not reported |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 7 |
Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.
share of total · 5 reported years
| Year | share of total |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 20 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 75 |
| 2025 | 0 |
Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.
Complaint mix, 2025
Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 7 officers involved.
Most serious allegation
| Differential Treatment | 3 |
|---|---|
| Improper Search | 2 |
| Demeanor | 1 |
| Other Criminal Violation | 1 |
Statewide category pages: Differential Treatment · Improper Search · Demeanor · Other Criminal Violation
Internal disposition
| not provided | 3 |
|---|---|
| Exonerated | 3 |
| Unfounded | 1 |
Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation
11 of 28
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 3 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0 |
Demeanor
7 of 28
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 1 |
Differential Treatment
5 of 28
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 3 |
Improper Search
2 of 28
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 2 |
Other (3 categories)
3 of 28
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 |
Against peers, 2025
How this grade was built →| Park Ridge Police Department | 140.0 |
|---|---|
| County median, municipal police (60) | 125.3 |
| NJ median, municipal police (445) | 125.9 |
Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.
7 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 21 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[21] = 33.3 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.
Report card
Grade B: Second-lowest fifth
On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology
- Combined standing
- 38th percentile of 171 peers
- Confidence
- Medium confidence
- small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases
Where this agency falls among its peers
The actual spread of discipline severity across Park Ridge Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.
Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)
| Range | Agencies |
|---|---|
| 0–50 | 120 |
| 50–100 | 24 |
| 100–150 | 15 |
| 150–200 | 7 |
| 200–250 | 3 |
| 250–300 | 2 |
Park Ridge Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 25th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).
How the grade is built
Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.
IA volumeweight 40%
123.0 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)
Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.
Discipline severityweight 40%
0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025
Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.
Allegation severityweight 20%
1.93 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)
Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.
What this grade can and can't tell you
- The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
- Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
- There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
- A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
- The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.
Where this agency ranks
| Metric | Value | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| IA per 100 investigated officers2025 | 140.0 | 158th of 445 municipal police |
| IA investigations2025 | 7 | 267th of 445 municipal police |
| IA incidents2025 | 4 | 303rd of 445 municipal police |
| Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year | 2.14 | 283rd of 460 municipal police |
| Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-31 | 1.71x | 46th of 415 municipal police |
| OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present | 14 | 303rd of 458 municipal police |
Major discipline records
No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.
Public records requests
Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[3] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.
Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.
This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Park Ridge Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 14 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 42 filed to Park Ridge Borough are about something else and are not shown.
What happened to those requests
Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.
| Awaiting agency response | 10 |
|---|---|
| Under internal review | 2 |
| Request refused | 2 |
Recent requests
The 12 most recent police-related requests to Park Ridge Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.
- 2025-12-15Awaiting agency response
- 2025-10-05Awaiting agency response
- 2025-09-13Awaiting agency response
- 2025-01-15Under internal review
- 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
- 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
- 2023-06-29Under internal review
- 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
- 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
- 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
- 2020-05-27Awaiting agency response
- 2020-05-27Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it
These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.
A member of the public requested: “Booking Report / Arrest Log”
2025-12-15 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Police Records Request”
2025-10-05 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest statistics CY 2025”
2025-09-13 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Third Party Police Overtime Hours”
2025-01-15 · Under internal review
A member of the public requested: “Purchase order history for the police department from 2020 - 2023”
2023-08-31 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Invoice of Body Camera Purchase in the Police Department”
2023-08-31 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Police Contract”
2023-06-29 · Under internal review
A member of the public requested: “OPRA - police officer-involved lawsuits 2012-2019”
2020-05-28 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “OPRA request: police payroll records 2012-2019”
2020-05-28 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “OPRA request -- use of force reports 2017-2019”
2020-05-28 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “OPRA: Purchase invoice of body worn cameras for the police department”
2020-05-27 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “OPRA: Purchase order history for the police department from 2012 to 2019”
2020-05-27 · Awaiting agency response
File your own records request
Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.
File an OPRA request about this department
See every request filed to Park Ridge Borough on OPRAmachine.
What this section can and can't tell you
- A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
- Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
- Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
- This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
- It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
- The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Park Ridge Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.
The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.
Questions and answers
What is a summary of Park Ridge Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?
Park Ridge Police Department, a municipal agency in Bergen County, recorded 7 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 5 officers named in those cases. Its rate of 140 per 100 officers sat above the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 municipal median. Heavier internal affairs volume is ambiguous. It can signal more misconduct, or a department that logs complaints others would leave undocumented. None of the 7 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Differential Treatment led the allegation categories, ahead of Improper Search and Demeanor. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Park Ridge PD received a B on the report card, at the 38th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.
How many internal affairs investigations did Park Ridge Police Department report in 2025?
Park Ridge Police Department reported 7 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 5 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.
How many major discipline records does Park Ridge Police Department have?
No major discipline records appear for Park Ridge Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.
How many officers does Park Ridge Police Department have?
Park Ridge Police Department reported 21 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 4.8% of them female. That is 2.14 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.
What does Park Ridge Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?
The median pensionable salary for the 21 active Park Ridge Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $156,605. The median for the 158 TPAF-enrolled staff at PARK RIDGE BORO BD OF ED is $97,057, a ratio of 1.61x. Against the Bergen County school-staff median the ratio is 1.71x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.
Sources
- [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2100. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
- [3]Records-request activity for Park Ridge Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
- [4]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Park Ridge PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [5]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
- [6]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8176. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8176. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8176. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8176. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 66. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1084. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1595. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 576. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2100. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Park Ridge PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
- [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Park Ridge PD row for 2021. ↩
- [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Park Ridge PD row for 2022. ↩
- [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Park Ridge PD row for 2023. ↩
- [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Park Ridge PD row for 2024. ↩
- [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Park Ridge PD row for 2025. ↩
- [21]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8176. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [22]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩