Department profile · Burlington County
Burlington County Bridge Commission
Reported as: Burlington County Bridge CommissionCounty agency
Jurisdiction context
Civil service status not verified
We could not match this agency to the NJCSC roster with confidence. Whether the Title 4A framework applies here is not asserted either way.
See the context on non-civil-service departments.
Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.
In brief
Burlington County Bridge Commission is a county agency in Burlington County. It reported one internal affairs investigation in 2025 and one officer named in that case, a rate of 100 per 100 officers that matched both the county median and the median for agencies of its type. Comparisons at this scale are thin, because a single case moves the rate, and a higher rate can reflect more misconduct or more complete reporting. None of the one investigation detailed for 2025 reported a sustained complaint. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the only allegation category.
No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. The site does not grade the commission, because its peer group is too small, with only one agency in the group of all county-other agencies.
Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.
Officers named in IA cases, 2025
1[1]
Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing
IA investigations, 2025
1[1]
Incidents, 2025
1[1]
Major discipline records
0
All years, 2020-2025
Staffing
As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.
Sworn officers, 2025
0[4]
1 year reported
| Year | sworn officers |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 0 |
Civilian employees, 2025
0[5]
Female sworn officers, 2025
0[6]
The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.
Military surplus equipment (1033 program)
No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.
Internal affairs investigations by year
counts
| Category | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8 |
| 2022 | 12 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 1 |
Incidents
1 in 2025
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 |
| 2022 | 11 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 1 |
Officers on IA rows
1 in 2025
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | not reported |
| 2022 | not reported |
| 2023 | not reported |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 1 |
Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.
share of total · 5 reported years
| Year | share of total |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 41.667 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 50 |
| 2025 | 0 |
Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.
Complaint mix, 2025
Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 1 officers involved.
Most serious allegation
| Other Departmental Rule Violation | 1 |
|---|
Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation
Internal disposition
| Not Sustained | 1 |
|---|
Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation
9 of 26
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 |
Demeanor
7 of 26
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 |
| 2022 | 3 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0 |
BWC/MVR Violation
2 of 26
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 |
Neglect of duty
2 of 26
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 |
Other (5 categories)
6 of 26
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0 |
Against peers, 2025
How this grade was built →| Burlington County Bridge Commission | 100.0 |
|---|---|
| County median, county agency (1) | 100.0 |
| NJ median, county agency (1) | 100.0 |
Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.
1 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 0 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[18] = Infinity per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.
Report card
Not graded: too few peers
Fewer than 8 comparable agencies (all county-other agencies); a percentile grade would be noise.
- Confidence
- Medium confidence
- small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases
How the grade is built
Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.
IA volumeweight 40%
106.9 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)
Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.
Discipline severityweight 40%
0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025
Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.
Allegation severityweight 20%
1.62 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)
Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.
What this grade can and can't tell you
- The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
- Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
- There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
- A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
- The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.
Where this agency ranks
| Metric | Value | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| IA per 100 investigated officers2025 | 100.0 | 1st of 1 county agency |
| IA investigations2025 | 1 | 1st of 1 county agency |
| IA incidents2025 | 1 | 1st of 1 county agency |
Major discipline records
No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.
Public records requests
No records-request history is shown for this department. OPRAmachine, an independent site that files and publishes Open Public Records Act requests, has no public body that confidently matches this department, so this site does not assert one. That does not mean nobody has requested records from it. (Checked against a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken 12 July 2026.) See the methodology for how the match is made.
Questions and answers
What is a summary of Burlington County Bridge Commission's internal affairs and discipline record?
Burlington County Bridge Commission is a county agency in Burlington County. It reported one internal affairs investigation in 2025 and one officer named in that case, a rate of 100 per 100 officers that matched both the county median and the median for agencies of its type. Comparisons at this scale are thin, because a single case moves the rate, and a higher rate can reflect more misconduct or more complete reporting. None of the one investigation detailed for 2025 reported a sustained complaint. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the only allegation category. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. The site does not grade the commission, because its peer group is too small, with only one agency in the group of all county-other agencies.
How many internal affairs investigations did Burlington County Bridge Commission report in 2025?
Burlington County Bridge Commission reported 1 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 1 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.
How many major discipline records does Burlington County Bridge Commission have?
No major discipline records appear for Burlington County Bridge Commission in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.
How many officers does Burlington County Bridge Commission have?
Burlington County Bridge Commission reported 0 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.
Sources
- [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2124. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [2]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Burlington County Bridge Commission row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [3]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
- [4]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8232. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [5]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8232. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [6]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8232. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [7]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 92. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [8]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1110. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [9]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1622. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 603. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2124. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Burlington County Bridge Commission row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
- [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Burlington County Bridge Commission row for 2021. ↩
- [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Burlington County Bridge Commission row for 2022. ↩
- [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Burlington County Bridge Commission row for 2023. ↩
- [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Burlington County Bridge Commission row for 2024. ↩
- [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Burlington County Bridge Commission row for 2025. ↩
- [18]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8232. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [19]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩