Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Union County

Cranford Police Department

Reported as: Cranford PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

In Union County, Cranford Police Department is a municipal police agency. It reported 17 officers named in internal affairs cases in 2025 and 22 investigations that year, a rate of 129.4 per 100 officers. That sat below the Union County median of 137 and slightly above the 125.9 statewide municipal median. Where a rate runs above a benchmark, the reason may be a heavier volume of misconduct or a fuller record of complaints received. Of the 22 investigations detailed for 2025, 6 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation and Improper Search.

No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Cranford received a C on the report card, at the 52nd percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

17[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

22[1]

Incidents, 2025

20[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

54[7]

65 years reported

54 sworn officers in 2025, up from 38 in 1960 (+42%).
Yearsworn officers
196038
196140
196240
196340
196440
196540
196641
196743
1968not reported
196947
197050
197149
197249
197353
197453
197552
197653
197753
197850
197944
198045
198146
198246
198347
198447
198548
198648
198748
198849
198949
199049
199148
199247
199349
199449
199550
199650
199750
199847
199947
200050
200150
200250
200349
200452
200552
200651
200752
200851
200951
201048
201146
201246
201344
201449
201550
201653
201752
201851
201954
202052
202152
202253
202353
202454
202554

Civilian employees, 2025

12[8]

0.22 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

6[9]

11.1% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.19[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Cranford Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3538
35–4027
40–4516
45–5014
50–559
55–607

Cranford Police Department: 54 sworn officers: 92nd percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 50 active Cranford Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$129,290[3]

50 active officers

Median local school staff

$80,102

CRANFORD TWP BD OF ED, 409 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.61x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.45x

Median officer to Union County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "CRANFORD TWP BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Union County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

A single truck accounts for the whole of Cranford Police Department's federal surplus record: one line item under Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled, shipped in 2014, with a recorded value of $49,897 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. It falls in a category this site classes as tactical. The record describes equipment received, not equipment currently held, because non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the federal program is not misconduct, and this data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page. This site's Militarization Index, an analysis rather than an official statistic, puts Cranford PD at $924 per officer, in the 75th percentile among 112 agencies in the 30-59 officers band; a higher index reflects program participation and not a worse department.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$49,897[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$49,897[2]

1 of 1 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2014[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 1 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Cranford Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled49,897 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Cranford Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical11 items (Each)$49,897

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Cranford Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-128-9552Shipped 2014-08-13 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$49,897

1 of 1 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Cranford Police Department received $924 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 75th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Cranford Police Department: 924 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 75th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Cranford Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
202113
202223
202322
202438
202522

Incidents

20 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202111
202219
202317
202417
202520

Officers on IA rows

22 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202421
202522
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202247.826
202331.818
202421.053
202527.273

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 22 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Cranford Police Department, 2025
not provided6
Demeanor6
Other Departmental Rule Violation4
Improper Search2
Neglect of Duty2
Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation1
Excessive Force1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Demeanor · Other Departmental Rule Violation · Improper Search · Neglect of Duty · Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation · Excessive Force

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Cranford Police Department, 2025
Exonerated10
Sustained6
Unfounded3
Not Sustained3

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

31 of 118

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20215
202210
20236
20246
20254

Demeanor

29 of 118

Demeanor allegations reported by Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20222
20235
202414
20256

Differential Treatment

13 of 118

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20220
20232
20248
20250

Excessive Force

7 of 118

Excessive Force allegations reported by Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20222
20232
20242
20251

Other (11 categories)

38 of 118

Other (11 categories) allegations reported by Cranford Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20229
20237
20248
202511

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Cranford Police Department129.4
County median, municipal police (23)137.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

22 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 54 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 40.7 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade C: Middle fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
52nd percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Cranford Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Cranford Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 15th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

91st percentileof 110 peers

155.1 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

15th percentileof 110 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

47th percentileof 110 peers

2.07 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025129.4209th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations202522106th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20252089th of 445 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$924109th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.19269th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.45x173rd of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present2997th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Cranford Township, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 29 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 143 filed to Cranford Township are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

29[4]

Identified by subject line, of 172 filed to Cranford Township

Most recent request

July 2026[4]

First recorded September 2019

Awaiting a response

21[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Cranford Township (requests)
Awaiting agency response20
Requester reported success4
Request refused3
Awaiting clarification1
Agency said records not held1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Cranford Township, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-07-07Awaiting agency response
  2. 2026-05-18Awaiting agency response
  3. 2026-04-22Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-12-17Requester reported success
  5. 2025-10-07Request refused
  6. 2025-10-07Awaiting agency response
  7. 2025-09-15Awaiting clarification
  8. 2025-01-30Awaiting agency response
  9. 2024-10-25Awaiting agency response
  10. 2024-05-01Agency said records not held
  11. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Cranford Township on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Cranford Township are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Cranford Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

In Union County, Cranford Police Department is a municipal police agency. It reported 17 officers named in internal affairs cases in 2025 and 22 investigations that year, a rate of 129.4 per 100 officers. That sat below the Union County median of 137 and slightly above the 125.9 statewide municipal median. Where a rate runs above a benchmark, the reason may be a heavier volume of misconduct or a fuller record of complaints received. Of the 22 investigations detailed for 2025, 6 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation and Improper Search. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Cranford received a C on the report card, at the 52nd percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Cranford Police Department report in 2025?

Cranford Police Department reported 22 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 17 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Cranford Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Cranford Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

How many officers does Cranford Police Department have?

Cranford Police Department reported 54 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 11.1% of them female. That is 2.19 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Cranford Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Cranford Police Department received 1 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program in 2014, with a total recorded value of $49,897 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Cranford Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Cranford Police Department under the 1033 program totals $49,897 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $49,897 is in categories this site classes as tactical (1 of 1 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Cranford Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 50 active Cranford Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $129,290. The median for the 409 TPAF-enrolled staff at CRANFORD TWP BD OF ED is $80,102, a ratio of 1.61x. Against the Union County school-staff median the ratio is 1.45x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2523. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Cranford Township. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Cranford PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8603. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8603. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8603. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8603. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 476. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1499. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2006. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 984. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2523. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Cranford PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Cranford PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Cranford PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Cranford PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Cranford PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Cranford PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8603. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩