Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Burlington County

Medford Township Police Department

Reported as: Medford Twp PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Medford Township Police Department logged 18 internal affairs investigations in 2025, with 13 officers named in those cases, a rate of 138.5 per 100 officers. That exceeds the Burlington County median of 125 and the 125.9 municipal median. The higher figure is ambiguous on its face: it can mean more misconduct, or a department that opens and records more complaints than its peers. Four of the 18 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation and Improper Arrest were the leading allegation categories, with Preventable MV Accident next.

No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Medford Twp received an A on the report card, at the 17th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

13[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

18[1]

Incidents, 2025

16[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

38[6]

60 years reported

38 sworn officers in 2025, up from 4 in 1962 (+850%).
Yearsworn officers
19624
19634
1964not reported
1965not reported
1966not reported
1967not reported
19688
196910
197010
197112
197215
197315
197417
197517
197618
197722
197822
197923
198023
198122
198223
198324
198426
198527
198626
198727
198830
198932
199033
199133
199233
199333
199432
199531
199633
199737
199837
199940
200040
200143
200241
200342
200443
200541
200643
200744
200848
200949
201046
201133
201228
201328
201429
201531
201630
201734
201837
201937
202035
202136
202239
202336
202436
202538

Civilian employees, 2025

4[7]

0.11 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

3[8]

7.9% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

1.49[9]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Medford Township Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3538
35–4026
40–4516
45–5014
50–5510
55–607

Medford Township Police Department: 38 sworn officers: 51st percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 38 active Medford Township Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$87,200[2]

38 active officers

Median local school staff

$91,982

MEDFORD TOWNSHIP BD OF ED, 301 TPAF members

Against the local district

0.95x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.01x

Median officer to Burlington County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "MEDFORD TOWNSHIP BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Burlington County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20218
202215
202328
202428
202518

Incidents

16 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20218
202213
202321
202420
202516

Officers on IA rows

18 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202427
202518
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202280
202350
202421.429
202522.222

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 18 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Medford Township Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation4
Improper Arrest4
Preventable MV Accident3
Differential Treatment2
Domestic violence (Non-Criminal)1
Demeanor1
False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal)1
Domestic violence (Criminal)1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Improper Arrest · Preventable MV Accident · Differential Treatment · Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) · Demeanor · False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal) · Domestic violence (Criminal)

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Medford Township Police Department, 2025
Exonerated9
not provided4
Sustained4
Unfounded1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

33 of 97

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20226
202315
20245
20254

Demeanor

30 of 97

Demeanor allegations reported by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20215
20223
20237
202414
20251

Preventable MV Accident

12 of 97

Preventable MV Accident allegations reported by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20223
20234
20242
20253

Improper Arrest

9 of 97

Improper Arrest allegations reported by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20245
20254

Other (7 categories)

13 of 97

Other (7 categories) allegations reported by Medford Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20223
20232
20242
20256

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Medford Township Police Department138.5
County median, municipal police (31)125.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

18 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 38 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[21] = 47.4 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade A: Lowest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
17th percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Medford Township Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Medford Township Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 15th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

58th percentileof 110 peers

128.4 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

15th percentileof 110 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

14th percentileof 110 peers

1.72 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[22] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025138.5169th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations202518121st of 445 municipal police
IA incidents202516112th of 445 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year1.49426th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.01x366th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present26117th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[3] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Medford Township, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 26 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 190 filed to Medford Township are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

26[3]

Identified by subject line, of 216 filed to Medford Township

Most recent request

June 2026[3]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

14[3]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Medford Township (requests)
Awaiting agency response14
Requester reported success8
Agency said records not held2
Request refused1
Requester reported partial success1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Medford Township, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-06-10Awaiting agency response
  2. 2026-05-27Requester reported success
  3. 2026-05-15Requester reported success
  4. 2026-04-14Agency said records not held
  5. 2026-02-05Requester reported success
  6. 2025-08-12Awaiting agency response
  7. 2025-06-23Request refused
  8. 2025-06-09Awaiting agency response
  9. 2025-05-23Awaiting agency response
  10. 2024-09-23Requester reported success
  11. 2023-11-03Requester reported success
  12. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Medford Township on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Medford Township are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Medford Township Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Medford Township Police Department logged 18 internal affairs investigations in 2025, with 13 officers named in those cases, a rate of 138.5 per 100 officers. That exceeds the Burlington County median of 125 and the 125.9 municipal median. The higher figure is ambiguous on its face: it can mean more misconduct, or a department that opens and records more complaints than its peers. Four of the 18 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation and Improper Arrest were the leading allegation categories, with Preventable MV Accident next. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Medford Twp received an A on the report card, at the 17th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Medford Township Police Department report in 2025?

Medford Township Police Department reported 18 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 13 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Medford Township Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Medford Township Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

How many officers does Medford Township Police Department have?

Medford Township Police Department reported 38 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 7.9% of them female. That is 1.49 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What does Medford Township Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 38 active Medford Township Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $87,200. The median for the 301 TPAF-enrolled staff at MEDFORD TOWNSHIP BD OF ED is $91,982, a ratio of 0.95x. Against the Burlington County school-staff median the ratio is 1.01x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2139. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  3. [3]Records-request activity for Medford Township. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  4. [4]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Medford Twp PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  6. [6]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8218. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8218. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8218. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8218. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 107. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1124. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1637. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 617. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2139. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Medford Twp PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Medford Twp PD row for 2021. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Medford Twp PD row for 2022. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Medford Twp PD row for 2023. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Medford Twp PD row for 2024. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Medford Twp PD row for 2025. ↩
  21. [21]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8218. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  22. [22]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩