Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Monmouth County

Spring Lake Police Department

Reported as: Spring Lake PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Spring Lake Police Department reported 3 internal affairs investigations in 2025 with 1 officer named in those cases, a rate of 300 per 100 officers against a Monmouth County median of 125 and a statewide municipal median of 125.9. Small headcounts make that ratio volatile, and a high rate can reflect more misconduct or a department that documents more of its complaints. None of the 3 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. The allegations recorded were Improper Arrest, Demeanor and Other Departmental Rule Violation. Allegations are not findings.

No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Spring Lake received a C on the report card, at the 60th percentile among 100 peers in the 1-14 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

1[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

3[1]

Incidents, 2025

3[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

14[7]

58 years reported

14 sworn officers in 2025, up from 13 in 1968 (+8%).
Yearsworn officers
196813
196913
197013
197114
197214
197312
197413
197513
197615
197715
197815
197913
198012
198112
198212
198312
198411
198513
198613
198713
198813
198913
199013
199114
199214
199313
199413
199513
199613
199714
199814
199914
200014
200114
200214
200314
200414
200514
200614
200714
200814
200914
201013
201113
201213
201313
201413
201513
201613
201713
201813
201913
202014
202114
202214
202314
202414
202514

Civilian employees, 2025

0[8]

0 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

1[9]

7.1% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

5.04[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Spring Lake Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 1-14 officers
RangeAgencies
0–213
2–43
4–61
6–817
8–1011
10–1215
12–1440

Spring Lake Police Department: 14 sworn officers: 93rd percentile among Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 12 active Spring Lake Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$154,172[3]

12 active officers

Median local school staff

$93,203

SPRING LAKE BORO BD OF ED, 27 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.65x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.77x

Median officer to Monmouth County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "SPRING LAKE BORO BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Monmouth County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Spring Lake Police Department received eight recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the federal military surplus program between 2013 and 2015, with a total recorded value of $80,884 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. Categories this site classes as tactical account for $66,388 of that. The leading categories were Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled at $50,458, Motor vehicle maintenance and repair shop specialized equipment at $14,496, and Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation at $8,944. These are transfers received over time, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$80,884[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$66,388[2]

7 of 8 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2013-2015[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 24 items (Each); 2 (Set). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Spring Lake Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled50,458 tactical
Motor vehicle maintenance and repair shop specialized equipment14,496 mundane
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation8,944 tactical
Optical sighting and ranging equipment6,102 tactical
Optical instruments884 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Spring Lake Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical11 items (Each)$50,458
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiationNight vision and thermal imaging · FSC 5855Tactical33 items (Each)$8,944
Optical sighting and ranging equipmentWeapon optics and sights · FSC 1240Tactical218 items (Each)$6,102
Optical instrumentsWeapon optics and sights · FSC 6650Tactical12 items (Each)$884
Motor vehicle maintenance and repair shop specialized equipmentTools and maintenance · FSC 4910Mundane12 (Set)$14,496

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Spring Lake Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
IMAGE INTENSIFIER,NIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-503-4799Shipped 2015-12-08 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$3,098
IMAGE INTENSIFIER,NIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-503-4799Shipped 2015-12-08 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$3,098
SIGHT,REFLEXNSN 1240-01-411-1265Shipped 2015-12-08 · DEMIL QOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical15 Each$5,085
TELESCOPE,STRAIGHTNSN 6650-00-530-0960Shipped 2015-11-05 · DEMIL DOptical instruments Tactical2 Each$884
SIGHT,REFLEXNSN 1240-01-411-1265Shipped 2015-09-04 · DEMIL QOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical3 Each$1,017
GOGGLES,NIGHTVISIONSN 5855-01-422-5413Shipped 2015-04-28 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$2,748
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-128-9551Shipped 2014-01-31 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$50,458
ANALYZER SET,ENGINENSN 4910-01-222-6589Shipped 2013-12-19 · DEMIL QMotor vehicle maintenance and repair shop specialized equipment Mundane2 Set$14,496

8 of 8 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Spring Lake Police Department received $4,742 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 90th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (1-14 officers, n=89).

Peer group: Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=89)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 1-14 officers
RangeAgencies
0–1000081
10000–200006
20000–300000
30000–400000
40000–500001

Spring Lake Police Department: 4,742 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 90th percentile among Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=89).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20211
20223
20231
20242
20253

Incidents

3 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20223
20231
20242
20253

Officers on IA rows

3 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20242
20253
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20220
20230
20240
20250

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 3 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Spring Lake Police Department, 2025
Improper Arrest1
Demeanor1
Other Departmental Rule Violation1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Improper Arrest · Demeanor · Other Departmental Rule Violation

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Spring Lake Police Department, 2025
Unfounded2
Exonerated1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Demeanor

5 of 10

Demeanor allegations reported by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20222
20231
20241
20251

Other Departmental Rule Violation

2 of 10

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20220
20230
20240
20251

Differential Treatment

1 of 10

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20230
20240
20250

Improper Arrest

1 of 10

Improper Arrest allegations reported by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20240
20251

Improper Search

1 of 10

Improper Search allegations reported by Spring Lake Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20241
20250

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Spring Lake Police Department300.0
County median, municipal police (41)125.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

3 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 14 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 21.4 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade C: Middle fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
60th percentile of 100 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Spring Lake Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 1-14 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5074
50–1006
100–1508
150–2002
200–2504
250–3002
300–3504

Spring Lake Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 34th percentile among Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

71st percentileof 100 peers

140.0 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

34th percentileof 100 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

58th percentileof 100 peers

2.10 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025300.05th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20253348th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20253333rd of 445 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$4,74255th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year5.0440th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.77x25th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present25126th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Spring Lake Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 25 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 114 filed to Spring Lake Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

25[4]

Identified by subject line, of 139 filed to Spring Lake Borough

Most recent request

April 2026[4]

First recorded November 2017

Awaiting a response

9[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Spring Lake Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response9
Requester reported partial success7
Requester reported success6
Request refused3

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Spring Lake Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-04-09Requester reported partial success
  2. 2026-03-22Awaiting agency response
  3. 2026-03-21Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-02-09Request refused
  5. 2024-06-07Request refused
  6. 2024-05-06Requester reported success
  7. 2023-11-22Requester reported partial success
  8. 2023-11-12Requester reported success
  9. 2023-10-24Request refused
  10. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  11. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2021-04-20Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Spring Lake Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Spring Lake Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Spring Lake Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Spring Lake Police Department reported 3 internal affairs investigations in 2025 with 1 officer named in those cases, a rate of 300 per 100 officers against a Monmouth County median of 125 and a statewide municipal median of 125.9. Small headcounts make that ratio volatile, and a high rate can reflect more misconduct or a department that documents more of its complaints. None of the 3 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. The allegations recorded were Improper Arrest, Demeanor and Other Departmental Rule Violation. Allegations are not findings. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Spring Lake received a C on the report card, at the 60th percentile among 100 peers in the 1-14 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Spring Lake Police Department report in 2025?

Spring Lake Police Department reported 3 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 1 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Spring Lake Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Spring Lake Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

How many officers does Spring Lake Police Department have?

Spring Lake Police Department reported 14 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 7.1% of them female. That is 5.04 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Spring Lake Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Spring Lake Police Department received 8 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2013 and 2015, with a total recorded value of $80,884 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Spring Lake Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Spring Lake Police Department under the 1033 program totals $80,884 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $66,388 is in categories this site classes as tactical (7 of 8 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Spring Lake Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 12 active Spring Lake Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $154,172. The median for the 27 TPAF-enrolled staff at SPRING LAKE BORO BD OF ED is $93,203, a ratio of 1.65x. Against the Monmouth County school-staff median the ratio is 1.77x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2369. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Spring Lake Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Spring Lake PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8459. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8459. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8459. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8459. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 336. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1352. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1858. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 839. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2369. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Spring Lake PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Spring Lake PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Spring Lake PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Spring Lake PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Spring Lake PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Spring Lake PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8459. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩