Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Camden County

Gloucester City Police Department

Reported as: Gloucester City PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Gloucester City on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Gloucester City Police Department, a municipal police agency in Camden County, reported 44 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 21 officers named in those cases. Its rate of 209.5 per 100 officers was the sort of figure that invites two readings, well above the Camden County median of 142.2 and the statewide municipal median of 125.9: it can mark a heavier volume of misconduct, or a department that documents complaints other agencies never file. Of the 44 investigations detailed for 2025, 21 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, followed by Neglect of Duty and Excessive Force.

No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Gloucester City PD received a D on the report card, at the 67th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

21[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

44[1]

Incidents, 2025

29[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

39[8]

64 years reported

39 sworn officers in 2025, up from 22 in 1960 (+77%).
Yearsworn officers
196022
196122
196222
196322
196423
196523
196623
1967not reported
196823
196923
197023
197123
197225
197323
197422
197522
197623
197726
197822
197922
198020
198122
198222
198321
198422
198522
198622
198723
198824
198923
199024
199125
199224
199324
199424
199525
199625
199725
199825
199928
200027
200129
200228
200329
200429
200529
200630
200730
200830
200930
201027
201126
201227
2013not reported
201428
201528
201629
201731
201832
201932
202036
202133
202235
202339
202439
202539

Civilian employees, 2025

2[9]

0.05 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

3[10]

7.7% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

3.35[11]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Gloucester City Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3538
35–4026
40–4516
45–5014
50–5510
55–607

Gloucester City Police Department: 39 sworn officers: 55th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 35 active Gloucester City Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$104,180[3]

35 active officers

Median local school staff

$90,356

GLOUCESTER CITY BD OF ED, 241 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.15x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.23x

Median officer to Camden County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "GLOUCESTER CITY BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Camden County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Gloucester City Police Department received two recorded line items of surplus military equipment in 1997, both under Guns, through 30mm. Their recorded value is $998, a figure that reflects original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value, and the category is one this site classes as tactical. These are transfers the department received in a single year, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the federal program is not misconduct, and this data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$998[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$998[2]

2 of 2 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

1997[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 2 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Gloucester City Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Guns, through 30mm998 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Gloucester City Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Guns, through 30mmWeapons · FSC 1005Tactical22 items (Each)$998

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Gloucester City Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-073-9421Shipped 1997-05-15 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$499
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-073-9421Shipped 1997-05-15 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$499

2 of 2 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Gloucester City Police Department received $26 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 68th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Gloucester City Police Department: 26 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 68th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
202144
202253
202337
202421
202544

Incidents

29 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202124
202235
202324
202417
202529

Officers on IA rows

44 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202421
202544
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202233.962
202337.838
202423.81
202547.727

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 44 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Gloucester City Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation11
Neglect of Duty9
Excessive Force7
BWC/MVR Violation5
Other Criminal Violation3
Demeanor3
Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation3
False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Criminal)2
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Neglect of Duty · Excessive Force · BWC/MVR Violation · Other Criminal Violation · Demeanor · Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation · False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Criminal)

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Gloucester City Police Department, 2025
Sustained21
not provided14
Exonerated7
Not Sustained2

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

62 of 199

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202131
202214
20234
20242
202511

Neglect of Duty

26 of 199

Neglect of Duty allegations reported by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20224
20238
20245
20259

Other Criminal Violation

20 of 199

Other Criminal Violation allegations reported by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20215
20229
20233
20240
20253

Excessive Force

17 of 199

Excessive Force allegations reported by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20223
20231
20244
20257

Other (18 categories)

74 of 199

Other (18 categories) allegations reported by Gloucester City Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20216
202223
202321
202410
202514

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Gloucester City Police Department209.5
County median, municipal police (34)142.2
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

44 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 39 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[23] = 112.8 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade D: Second-highest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
67th percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Gloucester City Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Gloucester City Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 15th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

100th percentileof 110 peers

184.9 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

15th percentileof 110 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

63rd percentileof 110 peers

2.23 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[24] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025209.517th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20254451st of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20252958th of 445 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$26145th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year3.3594th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.23x287th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present18220th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

One record in the Fatal Encounters dataset names Gloucester City Police Department, in 2009. The dataset records the force on it, in its own as-recorded terms, as Gunshot. The dataset comes from Fatal Encounters, an independent crowdsourced journalism project that logged deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, overdoses, and medical emergencies. A record means a death occurred during an encounter with the agency named in the as-reported agency field; it is not a finding of fault. Collection ended in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen at that point and later years are simply not covered.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[4] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Gloucester City Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

  • Carl Hurlock

    April 17, 2009 · Gloucester City · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[5] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Gloucester City, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 18 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 73 filed to Gloucester City are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

18[5]

Identified by subject line, of 91 filed to Gloucester City

Most recent request

May 2025[5]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

13[5]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Gloucester City (requests)
Awaiting agency response13
Requester reported partial success3
Requester reported success2

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Gloucester City, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-03-28Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-01-12Awaiting agency response
  4. 2024-08-27Awaiting agency response
  5. 2024-07-31Awaiting agency response
  6. 2024-05-31Awaiting agency response
  7. 2024-01-05Requester reported success
  8. 2023-11-01Requester reported success
  9. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  10. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  11. 2023-06-19Requester reported partial success
  12. 2022-03-27Requester reported partial success
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Gloucester City on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Gloucester City are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Gloucester City Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Gloucester City Police Department, a municipal police agency in Camden County, reported 44 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 21 officers named in those cases. Its rate of 209.5 per 100 officers was the sort of figure that invites two readings, well above the Camden County median of 142.2 and the statewide municipal median of 125.9: it can mark a heavier volume of misconduct, or a department that documents complaints other agencies never file. Of the 44 investigations detailed for 2025, 21 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, followed by Neglect of Duty and Excessive Force. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Gloucester City PD received a D on the report card, at the 67th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Gloucester City Police Department report in 2025?

Gloucester City Police Department reported 44 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 21 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Gloucester City Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Gloucester City Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

How many officers does Gloucester City Police Department have?

Gloucester City Police Department reported 39 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 7.7% of them female. That is 3.35 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Gloucester City Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Gloucester City Police Department received 2 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program in 1997, with a total recorded value of $998 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Guns, through 30mm. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Gloucester City Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Gloucester City Police Department under the 1033 program totals $998 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $998 is in categories this site classes as tactical (2 of 2 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Gloucester City Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 1 record naming Gloucester City Police Department, from 2009 through 2009. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Gloucester City Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 35 active Gloucester City Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $104,180. The median for the 241 TPAF-enrolled staff at GLOUCESTER CITY BD OF ED is $90,356, a ratio of 1.15x. Against the Camden County school-staff median the ratio is 1.23x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2170. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  5. [5]Records-request activity for Gloucester City. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Gloucester City PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  7. [7]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8247. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8247. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8247. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8247. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 138. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1153. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1665. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 645. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2170. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Gloucester City PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Gloucester City PD row for 2021. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Gloucester City PD row for 2022. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Gloucester City PD row for 2023. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Gloucester City PD row for 2024. ↩
  22. [22]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Gloucester City PD row for 2025. ↩
  23. [23]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8247. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  24. [24]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩