Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Burlington County

Bordentown Township Police Department

Reported as: Bordentown Twp PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Bordentown Township on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Bordentown Township Police Department, a municipal police agency in Burlington County, named 16 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and logged 26 investigations that year. The rate works out to 162.5 per 100 officers, above the Burlington County median of 125 and the 125.9 municipal median statewide. A rate above the median can mean more misconduct or a department that writes up more of what comes in. Of the 26 investigations detailed for 2025, 3 reported sustained complaints. Improper Arrest and Differential Treatment were the leading allegation categories, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation.

Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2022 and 2023. Bordentown Twp received a D on the report card, at the 77th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

16[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

26[1]

Incidents, 2025

16[1]

Major discipline records

2

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

30[8]

53 years reported

30 sworn officers in 2025, up from 9 in 1973 (+233%).
Yearsworn officers
19739
19749
19759
19769
19779
197810
197910
198013
198113
198212
198312
198411
198512
198613
198714
198814
198914
199015
199119
199219
199319
199418
199519
199620
199717
199820
199924
200024
200127
200223
200324
200423
200522
200622
200722
200823
200924
201024
201123
201223
201321
201425
201524
201623
201725
201823
201923
202023
202127
202231
202330
202430
202530

Civilian employees, 2025

3[9]

0.1 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

1[10]

3.3% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.31[11]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Bordentown Township Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3537
35–4027
40–4516
45–5014
50–5510
55–607

Bordentown Township Police Department: 30 sworn officers: 4th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 25 active Bordentown Township Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$91,788[3]

25 active officers

Median school staff

$86,565

Burlington County, all TPAF members

Against the county

1.06x

Median officer to Burlington County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Burlington County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Bordentown Township Police Department appears in the federal surplus file once: a single line item in the category Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled, shipped in 2018, with a recorded value of $89,900. That value is original Department of Defense acquisition cost, not a current or market price, and the item falls in a category this site classes as tactical. The record describes equipment the department received rather than an inventory it holds today, since non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the federal program is not misconduct, and this data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page. This site's Militarization Index, which is analysis and not an official statistic, puts Bordentown Twp PD at $2,997 per officer, in the 91st percentile among 112 agencies in the 30-59 officers band, where a higher index describes program participation rather than a worse department.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$89,900[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$89,900[2]

1 of 1 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2018[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 1 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Bordentown Township Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled89,900 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Bordentown Township Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical11 items (Each)$89,900

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Bordentown Township Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-380-8604Shipped 2018-08-20 · DEMIL QTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$89,900

1 of 1 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Bordentown Township Police Department received $2,997 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 91st percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Bordentown Township Police Department: 2,997 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 91st percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20216
20227
202413
202526

Incidents

16 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20215
20225
202410
202516

Officers on IA rows

26 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
202413
202526
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 4 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202242.857
202423.077
202511.538

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 26 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, 2025
Improper Arrest6
Differential Treatment6
Other Departmental Rule Violation5
Demeanor2
Improper Search2
Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency2
False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal)2
Loss Of Or Failure To Safeguard Agency Propert1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Improper Arrest · Differential Treatment · Other Departmental Rule Violation · Demeanor · Improper Search · Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency · False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal) · Loss Of Or Failure To Safeguard Agency Propert

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, 2025
Exonerated11
not provided11
Sustained3
Administratively Closed1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

19 of 52

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20224
2023not reported
20248
20255

Differential Treatment

9 of 52

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20220
2023not reported
20241
20256

Demeanor

6 of 52

Demeanor allegations reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20220
2023not reported
20243
20252

Improper Arrest

6 of 52

Improper Arrest allegations reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
2023not reported
20240
20256

Other (5 categories)

12 of 52

Other (5 categories) allegations reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20223
2023not reported
20241
20257

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Bordentown Township Police Department162.5
County median, municipal police (31)125.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

26 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 30 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[21] = 86.7 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade D: Second-highest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
77th percentile of 171 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Bordentown Township Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–50120
50–10024
100–15015
150–2007
200–2503
250–3002

Bordentown Township Police Department: 42.105 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 66th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

65th percentileof 171 peers

126.7 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

66th percentileof 171 peers

42.1 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

60th percentileof 171 peers

2.13 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[22] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025162.573rd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20252690th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents202516112th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20252127th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$2,99771st of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.31244th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.06x352nd of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present13325th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

0 major discipline records in 2025, holding roughly steady.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20221
20231
20240
20250

0 major discipline records in 2025, holding roughly steady.

Major discipline records reported by Bordentown Township Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2023Brian PesceChiefSuspended 30 days[23]
2022Joshua GardnerPatrolmanSuspended 15 days[24]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

Two records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Bordentown Township Police Department, one from 2019 and one from 2020. The as-recorded level of force is listed as Gunshot in one and Vehicle in the other. Fatal Encounters was an independent, crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind, including pursuits and medical emergencies. A record is not a finding of fault against the department or any officer. Collection ended in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen there.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[4] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Bordentown Township Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[5] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Bordentown Township, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 13 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 66 filed to Bordentown Township are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

13[5]

Identified by subject line, of 79 filed to Bordentown Township

Most recent request

November 2024[5]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

10[5]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Bordentown Township (requests)
Awaiting agency response10
Requester reported success2
Flagged for attention1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Bordentown Township, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2024-11-28Awaiting agency response
  2. 2024-07-31Flagged for attention
  3. 2023-12-26Awaiting agency response
  4. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  5. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  6. 2022-09-14Awaiting agency response
  7. 2022-02-12Requester reported success
  8. 2021-04-20Requester reported success
  9. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  10. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  11. 2020-05-27Awaiting agency response
  12. 2020-05-27Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Bordentown Township on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Bordentown Township are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Bordentown Township Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Bordentown Township Police Department, a municipal police agency in Burlington County, named 16 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and logged 26 investigations that year. The rate works out to 162.5 per 100 officers, above the Burlington County median of 125 and the 125.9 municipal median statewide. A rate above the median can mean more misconduct or a department that writes up more of what comes in. Of the 26 investigations detailed for 2025, 3 reported sustained complaints. Improper Arrest and Differential Treatment were the leading allegation categories, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation. Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2022 and 2023. Bordentown Twp received a D on the report card, at the 77th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Bordentown Township Police Department report in 2025?

Bordentown Township Police Department reported 26 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 16 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Bordentown Township Police Department have?

Bordentown Township Police Department has 2 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Bordentown Township Police Department have?

Bordentown Township Police Department reported 30 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 3.3% of them female. That is 2.31 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Bordentown Township Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Bordentown Township Police Department received 1 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program in 2018, with a total recorded value of $89,900 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Bordentown Township Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Bordentown Township Police Department under the 1033 program totals $89,900 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $89,900 is in categories this site classes as tactical (1 of 1 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Bordentown Township Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 2 records naming Bordentown Township Police Department, from 2019 through 2020. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Bordentown Township Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 25 active Bordentown Township Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $91,788. Against the Burlington County school-staff median the ratio is 1.06x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2120. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  5. [5]Records-request activity for Bordentown Township. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Bordentown Twp PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  7. [7]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8203. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8203. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8203. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8203. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 90. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1106. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 599. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2120. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bordentown Twp PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bordentown Twp PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bordentown Twp PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bordentown Twp PD row for 2024. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bordentown Twp PD row for 2025. ↩
  21. [21]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8203. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  22. [22]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  23. [23]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1515. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2062. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩