Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Bergen County

Fairview Police Department

Reported as: Fairview PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Fairview on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

Radio encryption

Fairview Police Department encrypts its radio communications (P25 AES-256, all operations), according to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, as of 2026-03-06 (unverified).

AnalysisThis site treats radio encryption as a meaningful transparency signal. When a department closes its radio traffic to the public, the public loses a real-time window into how it operates. That is context for reading the discipline and internal affairs records on this page, not a figure drawn from them.

In brief

Fairview Police Department is a municipal police agency in Bergen County. It named 5 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 8 investigations, a rate of 160 per 100 officers, against a Bergen County median of 125.3 and a statewide municipal median of 125.9. The gap cuts both ways: more internal affairs activity can mean more misconduct, or a department that documents complaints its peers leave unrecorded. None of the 8 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor, Other Departmental Rule Violation and Excessive Force were the leading allegation categories.

No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Fairview PD received an A on the report card, at the 20th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

5[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

8[1]

Incidents, 2025

5[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

30[7]

66 years reported

30 sworn officers in 2025, up from 20 in 1960 (+50%).
Yearsworn officers
196020
196120
196221
196320
196421
196522
196621
196723
196824
196927
197025
197125
197226
197325
197426
197525
197624
197727
197827
197926
198021
198124
198224
198324
198423
198524
198625
198725
198825
198925
199026
199126
199225
199327
199427
199533
199632
199732
199831
199929
200028
200127
200227
200327
200432
200532
200631
200733
200833
200933
201031
201133
201231
201331
201435
201532
201631
201733
201832
201932
202033
202133
202232
202329
202428
202530

Civilian employees, 2025

3[8]

0.1 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

2[9]

6.7% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

1.91[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Fairview Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3537
35–4027
40–4516
45–5014
50–5510
55–607

Fairview Police Department: 30 sworn officers: 4th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 28 active Fairview Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$154,018[3]

28 active officers

Median local school staff

$69,907

FAIRVIEW BORO BD OF ED, 148 TPAF members

Against the local district

2.20x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.68x

Median officer to Bergen County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "FAIRVIEW BORO BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Bergen County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Fairview Police Department received nine recorded line items of surplus military equipment in 2017, with a total recorded value of $61,611 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. All of that value falls into categories this site classes as tactical. The leading categories were Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation at $55,909 and Optical sighting and ranging equipment at $5,702. These are transfers the department received, not a current inventory: non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the federal program is not misconduct, and this data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$61,611[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$61,611[2]

9 of 9 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2017[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 23 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Fairview Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation55,909 tactical
Optical sighting and ranging equipment5,702 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Fairview Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiationNight vision and thermal imaging · FSC 5855Tactical77 items (Each)$55,909
Optical sighting and ranging equipmentWeapon optics and sights · FSC 1240Tactical216 items (Each)$5,702

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Fairview Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
NIGHT SIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-491-0140Shipped 2017-05-19 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$7,987
NIGHT SIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-491-0140Shipped 2017-05-19 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$7,987
NIGHT SIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-491-0140Shipped 2017-05-19 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$7,987
NIGHT SIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-491-0140Shipped 2017-05-19 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$7,987
NIGHT SIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-491-0140Shipped 2017-05-19 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$7,987
NIGHT SIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-491-0140Shipped 2017-05-19 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$7,987
NIGHT SIGHT VISIONNSN 5855-01-491-0140Shipped 2017-05-19 · DEMIL FNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$7,987
OPTICAL SIGHTING AND RANGING EQUIPMENTNSN 1240-DS-OPT-SIGHShipped 2017-05-17 · DEMIL COptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical1 Each$602
SIGHT,REFLEXNSN 1240-01-540-3690Shipped 2017-04-14 · DEMIL QOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical15 Each$5,100

9 of 9 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Fairview Police Department received $2,054 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 87th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Fairview Police Department: 2,054 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 87th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Fairview Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20214
202211
20236
20245
20258

Incidents

5 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20226
20235
20245
20255

Officers on IA rows

8 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20245
20258
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20229.091
202366.667
202460
20250

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 8 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Fairview Police Department, 2025
Demeanor2
Other Departmental Rule Violation2
Excessive Force2
Differential Treatment1
Improper Search1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Demeanor · Other Departmental Rule Violation · Excessive Force · Differential Treatment · Improper Search

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Fairview Police Department, 2025
Exonerated4
Administratively Closed2
Unfounded1
Not Sustained1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Demeanor

9 of 34

Demeanor allegations reported by Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20222
20231
20242
20252

Excessive Force

8 of 34

Excessive Force allegations reported by Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20226
20230
20240
20252

Other Departmental Rule Violation

6 of 34

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20221
20231
20240
20252

Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation

4 of 34

Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation allegations reported by Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20233
20240
20250

Other (5 categories)

7 of 34

Other (5 categories) allegations reported by Fairview Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20231
20243
20252

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Fairview Police Department160.0
County median, municipal police (60)125.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

8 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 30 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 26.7 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade A: Lowest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
20th percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Fairview Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Fairview Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 15th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

40th percentileof 110 peers

120.4 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

15th percentileof 110 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

76th percentileof 110 peers

2.38 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025160.076th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20258245th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20255267th of 445 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$2,05482nd of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year1.91341st of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.68x55th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present25126th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Fairview Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 25 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 56 filed to Fairview Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

25[4]

Identified by subject line, of 81 filed to Fairview Borough

Most recent request

October 2025[4]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

18[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Fairview Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response18
Agency said records not held2
Requester reported partial success2
Requester reported success1
Under internal review1
Flagged for attention1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Fairview Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-10-05Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-09-13Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-07-10Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-03-21Awaiting agency response
  5. 2024-09-28Awaiting agency response
  6. 2024-05-19Awaiting agency response
  7. 2024-05-11Awaiting agency response
  8. 2024-05-09Awaiting agency response
  9. 2024-01-11Awaiting agency response
  10. 2023-11-01Requester reported success
  11. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Fairview Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Fairview Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Fairview Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Fairview Police Department is a municipal police agency in Bergen County. It named 5 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 8 investigations, a rate of 160 per 100 officers, against a Bergen County median of 125.3 and a statewide municipal median of 125.9. The gap cuts both ways: more internal affairs activity can mean more misconduct, or a department that documents complaints its peers leave unrecorded. None of the 8 investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor, Other Departmental Rule Violation and Excessive Force were the leading allegation categories. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Fairview PD received an A on the report card, at the 20th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Fairview Police Department report in 2025?

Fairview Police Department reported 8 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 5 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Fairview Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Fairview Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

Does Fairview Police Department encrypt its radio communications?

According to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, Fairview Police Department encrypts all of its radio communications (P25 AES-256), as recorded on 2026-03-06. This site treats radio encryption as a transparency signal, which is analysis, not a figure from the discipline data.

How many officers does Fairview Police Department have?

Fairview Police Department reported 30 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 6.7% of them female. That is 1.91 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Fairview Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Fairview Police Department received 9 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program in 2017, with a total recorded value of $61,611 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Fairview Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Fairview Police Department under the 1033 program totals $61,611 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $61,611 is in categories this site classes as tactical (9 of 9 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Fairview Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 28 active Fairview Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $154,018. The median for the 148 TPAF-enrolled staff at FAIRVIEW BORO BD OF ED is $69,907, a ratio of 2.20x. Against the Bergen County school-staff median the ratio is 1.68x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2075. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Fairview Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Fairview PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8147. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8147. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8147. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8147. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 40. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1056. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1569. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 546. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2075. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Fairview PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Fairview PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Fairview PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Fairview PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Fairview PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Fairview PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8147. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩