Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Hudson County

Hoboken Police Department

Reported as: Hoboken PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Hoboken on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

Radio encryption

Hoboken Police Department encrypts its radio communications (P25 AES-256, all operations), according to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, as of 2026-03-06 (unverified).

AnalysisThis site treats radio encryption as a meaningful transparency signal. When a department closes its radio traffic to the public, the public loses a real-time window into how it operates. That is context for reading the discipline and internal affairs records on this page, not a figure drawn from them.

In brief

Hoboken Police Department, municipal police in Hudson County, logged 170 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 81 officers named in those cases. The rate of 209.9 per 100 officers runs well above the Hudson County median of 138.9 and the 125.9 municipal median. Read it two ways: as a heavier volume of misconduct, or as a department that documents a larger share of the complaints it receives. Of the 170 investigations detailed for 2025, 60 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the leading allegation category, with Demeanor and Neglect of Duty also prominent.

Nineteen major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, in every year from 2020 through 2025. Hoboken received an F on the report card, at the 84th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

81[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

170[1]

Incidents, 2025

161[1]

Major discipline records

19

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

139[7]

66 years reported

139 sworn officers in 2025, down from 166 in 1960 (-16%).
Yearsworn officers
1960166
1961161
1962170
1963167
1964161
1965154
1966139
1967142
1968135
1969140
1970135
1971145
1972144
1973160
1974158
1975144
1976148
1977140
1978144
1979147
1980140
1981125
1982123
1983107
1984121
1985140
1986136
1987121
1988129
1989132
1990131
1991132
1992128
1993142
1994136
1995133
1996141
1997152
1998152
1999151
2000166
2001162
2002150
2003167
2004167
2005161
2006153
2007150
2008156
2009155
2010149
2011138
2012128
2013121
2014128
2015132
2016126
2017135
2018134
2019140
2020133
2021139
2022134
2023135
2024139
2025139

Civilian employees, 2025

19[8]

0.14 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

15[9]

10.8% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.36[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Hoboken Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–20084
200–4005
400–6001
600–8001
800–10000
1000–12001

Hoboken Police Department: 139 sworn officers: 77th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 141 active Hoboken Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$137,231[2]

141 active officers

Median local school staff

$94,216

HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, 344 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.46x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.47x

Median officer to Hudson County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Hudson County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
2021188
2022162
202392
2024109
2025170

Incidents

161 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021188
2022145
202371
202468
2025161

Officers on IA rows

161 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
2024109
2025161
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202268.519
202354.348
202437.615
202535.294

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 161 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Hoboken Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation80
Demeanor43
Neglect of Duty13
Attendance issues12
Excessive Force6
BWC/MVR Violation6
Insubordination/Disobeying An Order3
not provided2
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Demeanor · Neglect of Duty · Attendance issues · Excessive Force · BWC/MVR Violation · Insubordination/Disobeying An Order

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Hoboken Police Department, 2025
Sustained61
Exonerated31
Unfounded28
not provided23
Administratively Closed18
Not Sustained9

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

338 of 721

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021152
202243
202325
202438
202580

Demeanor

100 of 721

Demeanor allegations reported by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202122
20226
20237
202422
202543

Attendance issues

83 of 721

Attendance issues allegations reported by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
202237
202328
20246
202512

Neglect of Duty

70 of 721

Neglect of Duty allegations reported by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
202210
202323
202424
202513

Other (15 categories)

130 of 721

Other (15 categories) allegations reported by Hoboken Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202114
202266
20239
202419
202522

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Hoboken Police Department209.9
County median, municipal police (13)138.9
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

170 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 139 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 122.3 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade F: Highest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
84th percentile of 93 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Hoboken Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–5066
50–10025
100–1501
150–2001

Hoboken Police Department: 48.387 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 67th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

95th percentileof 93 peers

178.1 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

67th percentileof 93 peers

48.4 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

5th percentileof 93 peers

1.46 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025209.916th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20251708th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20251618th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-2025196th of 282 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.36221st of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.47x162nd of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present4936th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

3 major discipline records in 2025, up from 1 in 2020 (+200%).
Yearmajor discipline records
20201
20212
20228
20233
20242
20253

3 major discipline records in 2025, up from 1 in 2020 (+200%).

Major discipline records reported by Hoboken Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Michael Costello, IIILieutenantDemoted[24]
2025Ahmed MakshatPatrolmanSuspended 10 days[25]
2025Michael StratenSergeantSuspended 30 days[26]
2024Damien BatesPatrolmanSuspended 25 days[27]
2024Christopher SotoPatrolmanSuspended 10 days[28]
2023Steven KranzSergeantSuspended 20 days[29]
2023Liana PalladinoOfficerSuspended 9 days[30]
2023Matthew IslerOfficerSeparated while IA pending[31]
2022Ranaldo GonzalezLieutenantSuspended 10 days[32]
2022Anthony RutkowskiPolice OfficerSuspended 30 days[33]
2022Anthony RutkowskiPolice OfficerSuspended 30 days[34]
2022Nathaniel ArochoPolice OfficerSuspended 30 days[35]
2022Liana PalladinoPolice OfficerSuspended 60 days[36]
2022Ricky TruppnerPolice OfficerSuspended 120 days[37]
2022Mathew IslerPolice OfficerSuspended 180 days[38]
2022Robert RomanSergeantSuspended 25 days[39]
2021Bernardo MunozOfficerSuspended 30 days[40]
2021Teddy SantiagoOfficerSuspended 10 days[41]
2020Mathew IslerOfficerSuspended 90 days[42]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

Two records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Hoboken Police Department, one from 2003 and one from 2004. The dataset's own as-recorded force label is Drowned in one and Gunshot in the other. Fatal Encounters was an independent, crowdsourced journalism project that documented deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, drownings, medical emergencies, and suicides in police presence. A record is not a finding of fault, and it does not say police caused the death. The project stopped collecting in December 2021, so the dataset ends there.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[3] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Hoboken Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Hoboken City, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 49 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 148 filed to Hoboken City are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

49[4]

Identified by subject line, of 197 filed to Hoboken City

Most recent request

March 2026[4]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

39[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Hoboken City (requests)
Awaiting agency response38
Requester reported success6
Requester reported partial success3
Request refused1
Awaiting clarification1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Hoboken City, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-03-23Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-12-30Requester reported success
  3. 2025-09-29Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-09-15Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-08-16Awaiting agency response
  6. 2025-08-16Awaiting agency response
  7. 2025-08-16Awaiting agency response
  8. 2025-08-16Awaiting agency response
  9. 2025-07-19Awaiting agency response
  10. 2025-06-21Awaiting agency response
  11. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Hoboken City on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Hoboken City are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Hoboken Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Hoboken Police Department, municipal police in Hudson County, logged 170 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 81 officers named in those cases. The rate of 209.9 per 100 officers runs well above the Hudson County median of 138.9 and the 125.9 municipal median. Read it two ways: as a heavier volume of misconduct, or as a department that documents a larger share of the complaints it receives. Of the 170 investigations detailed for 2025, 60 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the leading allegation category, with Demeanor and Neglect of Duty also prominent. Nineteen major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, in every year from 2020 through 2025. Hoboken received an F on the report card, at the 84th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Hoboken Police Department report in 2025?

Hoboken Police Department reported 170 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 81 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Hoboken Police Department have?

Hoboken Police Department has 19 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

Does Hoboken Police Department encrypt its radio communications?

According to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, Hoboken Police Department encrypts all of its radio communications (P25 AES-256), as recorded on 2026-03-06. This site treats radio encryption as a transparency signal, which is analysis, not a figure from the discipline data.

How many officers does Hoboken Police Department have?

Hoboken Police Department reported 139 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 10.8% of them female. That is 2.36 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Hoboken Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 2 records naming Hoboken Police Department, from 2003 through 2004. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Hoboken Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 141 active Hoboken Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $137,231. The median for the 344 TPAF-enrolled staff at HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION is $94,216, a ratio of 1.46x. Against the Hudson County school-staff median the ratio is 1.47x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2259. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  3. [3]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Hoboken City. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Hoboken PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8342. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8342. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8342. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8342. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 228. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1245. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1752. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 736. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2259. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Hoboken PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Hoboken PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Hoboken PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Hoboken PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Hoboken PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Hoboken PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8342. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 351. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 352. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  26. [26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 353. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  27. [27]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1098. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  28. [28]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1099. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  29. [29]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1710. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  30. [30]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1711. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  31. [31]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1712. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  32. [32]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2193. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  33. [33]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2194. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  34. [34]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2195. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  35. [35]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2196. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  36. [36]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2197. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  37. [37]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2198. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  38. [38]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2199. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  39. [39]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2200. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  40. [40]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2571. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  41. [41]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2572. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  42. [42]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2853. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩