Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Bergen County

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office

Reported as: Bergen Co Prosecutor’s OfficeCounty prosecutor

Jurisdiction context

Civil service status not verified

We could not match this agency to the NJCSC roster with confidence. Whether the Title 4A framework applies here is not asserted either way.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

The Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, a county prosecutor agency, named 10 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 15 investigations, a rate of 150 per 100 officers. That matches the Bergen County median of 150 and runs above the 107.5 median for prosecutor agencies. A caseload above the median can reflect more misconduct or an agency that documents more of the complaints brought to it. Of the 15 investigations detailed for 2025, 2 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the leading allegation category, with Other Criminal Violation and Excessive Force also recorded.

Three major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025. The office received a C on the report card, at the 60th percentile among 21 peers in the group of all prosecutor agencies, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

10[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

15[1]

Incidents, 2025

14[1]

Major discipline records

3

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

107[7]

49 years reported

107 sworn officers in 2025, up from 99 in 1976 (+8%).
Yearsworn officers
197699
197799
1978112
1979111
1980109
1981109
1982107
1983107
1984111
1985113
198682
198780
198881
1989110
1990110
1991112
1992114
1993114
199478
1995115
1996113
1997115
1998113
1999118
2000125
2001180
2002124
2003172
2004171
2005167
2006113
2007170
2008169
2009110
2010110
2011112
2012109
2013not reported
2014106
2015105
2016103
2017103
2018102
2019102
2020102
2021106
2022104
2023106
2024103
2025107

Civilian employees, 2025

159[8]

1.49 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

25[9]

23.4% of sworn officers

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies (n=20)

Sworn officers: County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies
RangeAgencies
0–509
50–1009
100–1502

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office: 107 sworn officers: 90th percentile among County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies (n=20).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office is among the heavier users of the federal surplus program in this data, with 21 recorded line items received between 2018 and 2026 and a recorded value of $503,895 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. Of that, $411,749 is in categories this site classes as tactical and $92,145 is not. The leading categories by value were Surface use explosive ordnance disposal tools at $231,603, Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation at $180,146, and Radio and television communication equipment, except airborne at $85,516. These are transfers the office received over time, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records. This site's Militarization Index, an analysis of program intensity rather than an official statistic, puts the office at $3,848 per officer, in the 98th percentile among the 20 prosecutor agencies it is compared with; a higher index is not automatically worse.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$503,895[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$411,749[2]

19 of 21 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2018-2026[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 88 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Surface use explosive ordnance disposal tools231,603 tactical
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation180,146 tactical
Radio and television communication equipment, except airborne85,516 mundane
ADP central processing unit, digital6,630 mundane

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Surface use explosive ordnance disposal toolsEOD robots and bomb-disposal equipment · FSC 1385Tactical11 items (Each)$231,603
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiationNight vision and thermal imaging · FSC 5855Tactical1860 items (Each)$180,146
Radio and television communication equipment, except airborneCommunications and electronics · FSC 5820Mundane125 items (Each)$85,516
ADP central processing unit, digitalComputers and office · FSC 7021Mundane12 items (Each)$6,630

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
IMAGE INTENSIFIER NNSN 5855-01-548-5687Shipped 2026-04-28 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$10,402
AF MEDIUM ROBOT EODNSN 1385-01-591-7915Shipped 2022-05-17 · DEMIL QSurface use explosive ordnance disposal tools Tactical1 Each$231,603
RECEIVER-TRANSMITTER,RADIONSN 5820-01-572-6748Shipped 2019-04-04 · DEMIL QRadio and television communication equipment, except airborne Mundane25 Each$85,516
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-599-7164Shipped 2018-10-01 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical2 Each$5,393
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-599-7164Shipped 2018-10-01 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical2 Each$5,393
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-599-7164Shipped 2018-10-01 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical3 Each$8,090
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-599-7164Shipped 2018-10-01 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical4 Each$10,787
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-599-7164Shipped 2018-10-01 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$2,697
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-599-7164Shipped 2018-10-01 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical2 Each$5,393
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-599-7164Shipped 2018-10-01 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical2 Each$5,393
COMPUTER,DIGITALNSN 7021-01-612-3103Shipped 2018-02-16 · DEMIL DADP central processing unit, digital Mundane2 Each$6,630
ILLUMINATOR,INTEGRATED,SMALL ARMSNSN 5855-01-534-5931Shipped 2018-01-24 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical34 Each$32,980

21 of 21 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office received $3,848 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 98th percentile among county prosecutor agencies of similar size (all prosecutor agencies, n=20).

Peer group: County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies (n=20)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies
RangeAgencies
019

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office: 3,848 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 98th percentile among County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies (n=20).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Categorycounts
20214
20227
20238
202414
202515

Incidents

14 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearcounts
20214
20223
20237
202412
202514

Officers on IA rows

15 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202414
202515
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20220
20230
202428.571
202513.333

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 15 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation4
Other Criminal Violation2
Excessive Force2
Demeanor2
Domestic violence (Non-Criminal)2
Insubordination/Disobeying An Order1
Use Of Force Policy Violation1
Domestic violence (Criminal)1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Other Criminal Violation · Excessive Force · Demeanor · Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) · Insubordination/Disobeying An Order · Use Of Force Policy Violation · Domestic violence (Criminal)

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, 2025
not provided8
Sustained3
Not Sustained1
Administratively Closed1
Unfounded1
Exonerated1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

15 of 48

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20220
20234
20246
20254

Other Criminal Violation

10 of 48

Other Criminal Violation allegations reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20221
20232
20242
20252

Excessive Force

5 of 48

Excessive Force allegations reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20223
20230
20240
20252

Demeanor

4 of 48

Demeanor allegations reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20231
20241
20252

Other (7 categories)

14 of 48

Other (7 categories) allegations reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20223
20231
20245
20255

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office150.0
County median, county prosecutor (1)150.0
NJ median, county prosecutor (21)107.5

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

15 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 107 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[21] = 14.0 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade C: Middle fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
60th percentile of 21 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies (n=21)

Discipline severity: County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies
RangeAgencies
0–10016
100–2002
200–3002
300–4001

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office: 55.556 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 64th percentile among County prosecutor, all prosecutor agencies (n=21).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

17th percentileof 21 peers

103.0 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

64th percentileof 21 peers

55.6 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

93rd percentileof 21 peers

2.71 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[22] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025150.01st of 21 county prosecutor
IA investigations2025156th of 21 county prosecutor
IA incidents2025145th of 21 county prosecutor
Major discipline2020-202532nd of 16 county prosecutor
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$3,8481st of 2 county prosecutor
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present428th of 15 county prosecutor

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20220
20231
20241
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Bradley GilmoreSergeantSuspended 90 days[23]
2024Jason LoveChiefSuspended 17 days[24]
2023Kevin MatthewLt.Other sanction[25]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

Three records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, spanning 2004 through 2015. The force labels, as recorded by the project, are Drug overdose in one, Gunshot in one, and Vehicle in one. Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced journalism project that documented deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, deaths in police presence, and medical emergencies. A record is not a finding of fault against the agency or any officer, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records elsewhere on this page. The project stopped collecting in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen and nothing after that date appears here.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[3] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Bergen County Prosecutor’s Officeis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

  • Hue Dang

    March 9, 2015 · Hackensack · Highest level of force as recorded: Vehicle

  • Gregory Davis

    October 1, 2004 · South Hackensack · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

  • Keith Murray

    September 15, 2004 · Englewood · Highest level of force as recorded: Drug overdose

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

Police-related requests

42[4]

Every request filed to this department

Most recent request

April 2026[4]

First recorded February 2019

Awaiting a response

16[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of records requests to Bergen County Prosecutor's Office (requests)
Requester reported success17
Awaiting agency response16
Requester reported partial success5
Request refused2
Agency said records not held2

Recent requests

The 12 most recent requests to Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-04-04Awaiting agency response
  2. 2026-02-02Awaiting agency response
  3. 2026-02-02Awaiting agency response
  4. 2026-01-15Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-11-27Awaiting agency response
  6. 2025-09-10Awaiting agency response
  7. 2025-08-18Request refused
  8. 2025-08-15Awaiting agency response
  9. 2025-08-12Requester reported success
  10. 2025-02-19Awaiting agency response
  11. 2025-01-13Requester reported success
  12. 2024-07-31Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this department under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Bergen County Prosecutor's Office on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office's internal affairs and discipline record?

The Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, a county prosecutor agency, named 10 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 15 investigations, a rate of 150 per 100 officers. That matches the Bergen County median of 150 and runs above the 107.5 median for prosecutor agencies. A caseload above the median can reflect more misconduct or an agency that documents more of the complaints brought to it. Of the 15 investigations detailed for 2025, 2 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the leading allegation category, with Other Criminal Violation and Excessive Force also recorded. Three major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025. The office received a C on the report card, at the 60th percentile among 21 peers in the group of all prosecutor agencies, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office report in 2025?

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office reported 15 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 10 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office have?

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office has 3 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office have?

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office reported 107 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 23.4% of them female. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office received through the 1033 program?

Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office received 21 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2018 and 2026, with a total recorded value of $503,895 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Surface use explosive ordnance disposal tools. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office under the 1033 program totals $503,895 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $411,749 is in categories this site classes as tactical (19 of 21 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 3 records naming Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, from 2004 through 2015. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2058. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Bergen County Prosecutor's Office. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Bergen Co Prosecutor’s Office row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8199. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8199. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8199. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 23. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1039. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1553. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 529. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2058. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bergen Co Prosecutor’s Office row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bergen Co Prosecutor’s Office row for 2021. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bergen Co Prosecutor’s Office row for 2022. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bergen Co Prosecutor’s Office row for 2023. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bergen Co Prosecutor’s Office row for 2024. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Bergen Co Prosecutor’s Office row for 2025. ↩
  21. [21]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8199. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  22. [22]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  23. [23]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 56. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 861. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1497. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩