Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Bergen County

Carlstadt Police Department

Reported as: Carlstadt PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Carlstadt Police Department is a municipal police agency in Bergen County. It logged 11 internal affairs investigations in 2025 and named 8 officers in those cases, a rate of 137.5 per 100 officers, above the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 municipal median statewide. The margin can be read two ways, as more misconduct or as a department that documents more of its complaints. Of the 11 investigations detailed for 2025, 6 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the leading allegation category, with Neglect of Duty and Demeanor also listed.

One major discipline record appears in the 2020-2025 releases, from 2025. Carlstadt received a C on the report card, at the 52nd percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

8[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

11[1]

Incidents, 2025

7[1]

Major discipline records

1

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

29[8]

66 years reported

29 sworn officers in 2025, up from 15 in 1960 (+93%).
Yearsworn officers
196015
196115
196215
196315
196414
196516
196616
196718
196821
196921
197022
197123
197225
197325
197425
197524
197624
197724
197827
197927
198024
198128
198226
198327
198427
198525
198630
198727
198831
198931
199030
199130
199229
199327
199427
199526
199626
199726
199831
199931
200030
200130
200228
200331
200431
200532
200631
200731
200831
200928
201022
201123
201227
201323
201425
201526
201626
201728
201828
201926
202026
202126
202224
202325
202425
202529

Civilian employees, 2025

4[9]

0.14 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

2[10]

6.9% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

4.48[11]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Carlstadt Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
14–1617
16–1820
18–2027
20–2217
22–2426
24–2624
26–2817
28–3018

Carlstadt Police Department: 29 sworn officers: 96th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 30 active Carlstadt Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$177,581[3]

30 active officers

Median local school staff

$95,296

CARLSTADT BOROUGH BD OF ED, 55 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.86x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.94x

Median officer to Bergen County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "CARLSTADT BOROUGH BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Bergen County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Carlstadt Police Department received three recorded line items of federal surplus equipment between 2017 and 2021, with a recorded value of $248,994 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. Two of the three, both under Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled, account for $152,528 and fall in a category this site classes as tactical. The third, a passenger motor vehicle at $96,466, does not. The file records equipment the department received, not an inventory it holds today, since non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records. This site's Militarization Index, an analysis and not an official statistic, puts Carlstadt PD at $5,260 per officer, in the 90th percentile among 167 agencies in the 15-29 officers band; a higher index is not automatically worse.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$248,994[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$152,528[2]

2 of 3 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2017-2021[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 3 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Carlstadt Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled152,528 tactical
Passenger motor vehicles96,466 mundane

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Carlstadt Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical22 items (Each)$152,528
Passenger motor vehiclesUtility vehicles and parts · FSC 2310Mundane11 items (Each)$96,466

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Carlstadt Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
TRUCK,AMBULANCENSN 2310-01-111-2274Shipped 2021-10-19 · DEMIL CPassenger motor vehicles Mundane1 Each$96,466
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-380-8233Shipped 2018-01-02 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$88,634
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-107-7153Shipped 2017-12-28 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$63,894

3 of 3 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Carlstadt Police Department received $5,260 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 90th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (15-29 officers, n=167).

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000148
5000–1000012
10000–150004
15000–200001
20000–250000
25000–300001

Carlstadt Police Department: 5,260 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 90th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20216
20224
20236
20245
202511

Incidents

7 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20216
20224
20234
20243
20257

Officers on IA rows

11 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20245
202511
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20220
202316.667
202460
202554.545

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 11 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Carlstadt Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation7
Neglect of Duty2
Demeanor1
False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal)1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Neglect of Duty · Demeanor · False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal)

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Carlstadt Police Department, 2025
Sustained6
Administratively Closed3
not provided1
Exonerated1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

11 of 32

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20231
20242
20257

Demeanor

7 of 32

Demeanor allegations reported by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20222
20232
20240
20251

not provided

4 of 32

not provided allegations reported by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20230
20243
20250

Domestic violence (Non-Criminal)

2 of 32

Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) allegations reported by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20220
20230
20240
20250

Other (6 categories)

8 of 32

Other (6 categories) allegations reported by Carlstadt Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20220
20233
20240
20253

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Carlstadt Police Department137.5
County median, municipal police (60)125.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

11 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 29 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[23] = 37.9 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade C: Middle fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
52nd percentile of 171 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Carlstadt Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–50120
50–10024
100–15015
150–2007
200–2503
250–3002

Carlstadt Police Department: 37.037 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 63rd percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

49th percentileof 171 peers

119.6 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

63rd percentileof 171 peers

37.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

33rd percentileof 171 peers

1.82 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[24] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025137.5173rd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations202511199th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20257228th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20251184th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$5,26050th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year4.4846th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.94x6th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present14303rd of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20220
20230
20240
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Carlstadt Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Christopher HaschLieutenantSuspended 20 days[25]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

One record in the Fatal Encounters dataset names Carlstadt Police Department, from 2021. The as-recorded level of force in that record is listed as Gunshot. Fatal Encounters was an independent, crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, deaths by suicide in police presence, and medical emergencies. A record is not a finding of fault, and it does not say police caused the death. Collection ended in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen at that date.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[4] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Carlstadt Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

  • James T. Cox

    April 3, 2021 · Carlstadt · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[5] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Carlstadt Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 14 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 59 filed to Carlstadt Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

14[5]

Identified by subject line, of 73 filed to Carlstadt Borough

Most recent request

December 2025[5]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

11[5]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Carlstadt Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response11
Delivery error3

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Carlstadt Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-12-15Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-10-05Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-09-13Awaiting agency response
  4. 2024-11-25Awaiting agency response
  5. 2024-08-23Awaiting agency response
  6. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  7. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  8. 2023-04-24Delivery error
  9. 2021-04-20Delivery error
  10. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  11. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  12. 2020-05-27Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Carlstadt Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Carlstadt Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Carlstadt Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Carlstadt Police Department is a municipal police agency in Bergen County. It logged 11 internal affairs investigations in 2025 and named 8 officers in those cases, a rate of 137.5 per 100 officers, above the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 municipal median statewide. The margin can be read two ways, as more misconduct or as a department that documents more of its complaints. Of the 11 investigations detailed for 2025, 6 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation was the leading allegation category, with Neglect of Duty and Demeanor also listed. One major discipline record appears in the 2020-2025 releases, from 2025. Carlstadt received a C on the report card, at the 52nd percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Carlstadt Police Department report in 2025?

Carlstadt Police Department reported 11 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 8 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Carlstadt Police Department have?

Carlstadt Police Department has 1 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Carlstadt Police Department have?

Carlstadt Police Department reported 29 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 6.9% of them female. That is 4.48 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Carlstadt Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Carlstadt Police Department received 3 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2017 and 2021, with a total recorded value of $248,994 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Carlstadt Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Carlstadt Police Department under the 1033 program totals $248,994 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $152,528 is in categories this site classes as tactical (2 of 3 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Carlstadt Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 1 record naming Carlstadt Police Department, from 2021 through 2021. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Carlstadt Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 30 active Carlstadt Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $177,581. The median for the 55 TPAF-enrolled staff at CARLSTADT BOROUGH BD OF ED is $95,296, a ratio of 1.86x. Against the Bergen County school-staff median the ratio is 1.94x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2062. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  5. [5]Records-request activity for Carlstadt Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Carlstadt PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  7. [7]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8134. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8134. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8134. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8134. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 27. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1043. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1557. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 533. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2062. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Carlstadt PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Carlstadt PD row for 2021. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Carlstadt PD row for 2022. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Carlstadt PD row for 2023. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Carlstadt PD row for 2024. ↩
  22. [22]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Carlstadt PD row for 2025. ↩
  23. [23]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8134. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  24. [24]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 70. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩