Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Atlantic County

Brigantine Police Department

Reported as: Brigantine PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Brigantine Police Department is a municipal police agency in Atlantic County. It reported 3 internal affairs investigations in 2025 and 3 officers named in those cases, a rate of 100 per 100 officers that fell below the Atlantic County median of 119 and the 125.9 municipal median. A rate under the median can mean fewer complaints or a department that records fewer of them. All 3 of the investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Assault, Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) and DUI/DWI On duty were the allegation categories listed. Allegations are not findings.

Four major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2021 and 2025. Brigantine received an F on the report card, at the 92nd percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

3[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

3[1]

Incidents, 2025

3[1]

Major discipline records

4

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

34[7]

65 years reported

34 sworn officers in 2025, up from 8 in 1961 (+325%).
Yearsworn officers
19618
19628
19638
19648
196510
196610
196710
196812
196914
197015
197115
197216
197317
197418
197522
197623
197722
197824
197925
198024
198122
198222
198323
198424
198526
198628
198730
198831
198932
199035
199135
199236
199333
199438
199538
199637
199740
199839
199940
200038
200139
200238
200336
200438
200538
200637
200738
200836
200935
201035
201135
201234
201333
201434
201534
201635
201734
201834
201934
202035
202135
202234
202334
202434
202534

Civilian employees, 2025

10[8]

0.29 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

3[9]

8.8% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

4.42[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Brigantine Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3537
35–4027
40–4516
45–5014
50–5510
55–607

Brigantine Police Department: 34 sworn officers: 29th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 34 active Brigantine Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$87,045[3]

34 active officers

Median local school staff

$106,194

BRIGANTINE CITY BD OF ED, 65 TPAF members

Against the local district

0.82x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

0.97x

Median officer to Atlantic County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "BRIGANTINE CITY BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Atlantic County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Brigantine Police Department's only recorded federal surplus transfer is a single line item under Passenger motor vehicles, shipped in 2022, with a recorded value of $96,466 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. None of that falls in the categories this site classes as tactical, so the department's tactical total is $0. The file records what was received, not what is currently held, since non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the federal program is not misconduct, and this data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page. This site's Militarization Index, an analysis rather than an official statistic, puts Brigantine PD at $0 per officer, in the 33rd percentile among 112 agencies in the 30-59 officers band, because the index counts only tactical value.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$96,466[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$0[2]

0 of 1 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2022[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 1 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Brigantine Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Passenger motor vehicles96,466 mundane

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Brigantine Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Passenger motor vehiclesUtility vehicles and parts · FSC 2310Mundane11 items (Each)$96,466

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Brigantine Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
TRUCK,AMBULANCENSN 2310-01-111-2274Shipped 2022-12-21 · DEMIL CPassenger motor vehicles Mundane1 Each$96,466

1 of 1 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Brigantine Police Department received $0 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 33rd percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Brigantine Police Department: 0 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 33rd percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20219
202210
20236
20243
20253

Incidents

3 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20216
20227
20236
20243
20253

Officers on IA rows

3 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20243
20253
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20220
202333.333
20240
2025100

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 3 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Brigantine Police Department, 2025
Assault1
Domestic violence (Non-Criminal)1
DUI/DWI On duty1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Assault · Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) · DUI/DWI On duty

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Brigantine Police Department, 2025
Sustained3

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

7 of 31

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20222
20232
20240
20250

Demeanor

6 of 31

Demeanor allegations reported by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20224
20231
20241
20250

Domestic violence (Non-Criminal)

4 of 31

Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) allegations reported by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20221
20231
20240
20251

Other Criminal Violation

4 of 31

Other Criminal Violation allegations reported by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20214
20220
20230
20240
20250

Other (6 categories)

10 of 31

Other (6 categories) allegations reported by Brigantine Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20223
20232
20242
20252

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Brigantine Police Department100.0
County median, municipal police (14)119.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

3 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 34 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 8.8 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade F: Highest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
92nd percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Brigantine Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Brigantine Police Department: 153.846 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 94th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

30th percentileof 110 peers

117.5 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

94th percentileof 110 peers

153.8 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

94th percentileof 110 peers

2.68 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025100.0322nd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20253348th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20253333rd of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-2025458th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$0152nd of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year4.4248th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-310.97x380th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present26117th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

2 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20212
20220
20230
20240
20252

2 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Brigantine Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Matthew RehillPatrolmanSuspended 45 days[24]
2025Tyler SuarlikPatrolmanSuspended 61 days[25]
2021Joseph SweetOfficerSuspended 65 days[26]
2021Joseph SweetOfficerSuspended 35 days[27]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Brigantine City, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 26 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 120 filed to Brigantine City are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

26[4]

Identified by subject line, of 146 filed to Brigantine City

Most recent request

May 2026[4]

First recorded December 2017

Awaiting a response

14[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Brigantine City (requests)
Awaiting agency response14
Requester reported success6
Request refused2
Requester reported partial success2
Under internal review1
Agency said records not held1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Brigantine City, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-05-25Requester reported success
  2. 2026-04-22Under internal review
  3. 2026-03-28Agency said records not held
  4. 2025-09-29Awaiting agency response
  5. 2024-11-25Awaiting agency response
  6. 2024-08-24Awaiting agency response
  7. 2024-07-23Awaiting agency response
  8. 2024-06-25Awaiting agency response
  9. 2024-04-15Request refused
  10. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  11. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2023-02-18Requester reported success
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Brigantine City on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Brigantine City are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Brigantine Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Brigantine Police Department is a municipal police agency in Atlantic County. It reported 3 internal affairs investigations in 2025 and 3 officers named in those cases, a rate of 100 per 100 officers that fell below the Atlantic County median of 119 and the 125.9 municipal median. A rate under the median can mean fewer complaints or a department that records fewer of them. All 3 of the investigations detailed for 2025 reported sustained complaints. Assault, Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) and DUI/DWI On duty were the allegation categories listed. Allegations are not findings. Four major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2021 and 2025. Brigantine received an F on the report card, at the 92nd percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Brigantine Police Department report in 2025?

Brigantine Police Department reported 3 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 3 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Brigantine Police Department have?

Brigantine Police Department has 4 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Brigantine Police Department have?

Brigantine Police Department reported 34 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 8.8% of them female. That is 4.42 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Brigantine Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Brigantine Police Department received 1 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program in 2022, with a total recorded value of $96,466 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Passenger motor vehicles. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Brigantine Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Brigantine Police Department under the 1033 program totals $96,466 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $0 is in categories this site classes as tactical (0 of 1 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Brigantine Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 34 active Brigantine Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $87,045. The median for the 65 TPAF-enrolled staff at BRIGANTINE CITY BD OF ED is $106,194, a ratio of 0.82x. Against the Atlantic County school-staff median the ratio is 0.97x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2043. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Brigantine City. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Brigantine PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8113. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8113. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8113. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8113. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 7. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1022. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1536. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 514. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2043. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Brigantine PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Brigantine PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Brigantine PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Brigantine PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Brigantine PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Brigantine PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8113. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 52. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 53. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  26. [26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2423. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  27. [27]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2424. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩