Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Monmouth County

Little Silver Police Department

Reported as: Little Silver PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

3[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

3[1]

Incidents, 2025

3[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

16[6]

65 years reported

16 sworn officers in 2025, up from 8 in 1960 (+100%).
Yearsworn officers
19608
1961not reported
19628
19638
19648
19658
19668
19678
19688
196910
197010
197110
197211
197311
197412
197511
197612
197712
197812
197912
198015
198114
198213
198315
198414
198513
198613
198714
198814
198915
199014
199114
199214
199314
199414
199515
199616
199713
199814
199914
200014
200113
200215
200315
200415
200515
200615
200716
200816
200916
201016
201116
201217
201316
201416
201516
201616
201716
201818
201916
202015
202119
202217
202316
202416
202516

Civilian employees, 2025

4[7]

0.25 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

1[8]

6.3% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.63[9]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Little Silver Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
14–1617
16–1819
18–2027
20–2217
22–2426
24–2624
26–2817
28–3019

Little Silver Police Department: 16 sworn officers: 12th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 15 active Little Silver Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$71,319[3]

15 active officers

Median local school staff

$83,175

LITTLE SILVER BD OF ED, 98 TPAF members

Against the local district

0.86x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

0.82x

Median officer to Monmouth County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "LITTLE SILVER BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Monmouth County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Little Silver Police Department received 29 recorded line items of surplus military equipment between 2014 and 2019, with a total recorded value of $61,841 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. All of it falls into categories this site classes as tactical. A single entry under Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled accounts for $50,458 of the total, with Guns, through 30mm at $11,383 across the remaining line items. These are transfers the department received, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the federal program is not misconduct, and this data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$61,841[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$61,841[2]

29 of 29 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2014-2019[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 106 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Little Silver Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled50,458 tactical
Guns, through 30mm11,383 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Little Silver Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical11 items (Each)$50,458
Guns, through 30mmWeapons · FSC 1005Tactical28105 items (Each)$11,383

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Little Silver Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
MAGAZINE,CARTRIDGENSN 1005-01-520-5992Shipped 2019-02-14 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical30 Each$1,284
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2018-01-30 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2018-01-30 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2018-01-30 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
MAGAZINE,CARTRIDGENSN 1005-00-921-5004Shipped 2017-12-20 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical30 Each$485
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
MAGAZINE,CARTRIDGENSN 1005-00-056-2237Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical20 Each$323
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
BARREL AND FRONT SIGHT ASSEMBLYNSN 1005-01-233-8529Shipped 2017-12-19 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$120
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-01-128-9936Shipped 2014-11-13 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$749
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-128-9551Shipped 2014-02-05 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$50,458

29 of 29 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Little Silver Police Department received $3,865 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 87th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (15-29 officers, n=167).

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000147
5000–1000013
10000–150004
15000–200001
20000–250000
25000–300001

Little Silver Police Department: 3,865 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 87th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20216
20222
20253

Incidents

3 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20214
20222
20253
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 3 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202250
202533.333

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 3 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Little Silver Police Department, 2025
Differential Treatment1
Preventable MV Accident1
Improper Entry1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Differential Treatment · Preventable MV Accident · Improper Entry

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Little Silver Police Department, 2025
Unfounded2
Sustained1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

6 of 11

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20215
20221
2023not reported
2024not reported
20250

Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency

1 of 11

Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency allegations reported by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
2023not reported
2024not reported
20250

Demeanor

1 of 11

Demeanor allegations reported by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20220
2023not reported
2024not reported
20250

Differential Treatment

1 of 11

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
2023not reported
2024not reported
20251

Other (2 categories)

2 of 11

Other (2 categories) allegations reported by Little Silver Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
2023not reported
2024not reported
20252

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Little Silver Police Department100.0
County median, municipal police (41)125.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

3 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 16 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[17] = 18.8 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade A: Lowest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
1st percentile of 171 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Little Silver Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–50120
50–10024
100–15015
150–2007
200–2503
250–3002

Little Silver Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 25th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

5th percentileof 171 peers

100.0 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

25th percentileof 171 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

13th percentileof 171 peers

1.55 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[18] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025100.0322nd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20253348th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20253333rd of 445 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$3,86561st of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.63173rd of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-310.82x405th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present3086th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Little Silver Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 30 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 132 filed to Little Silver Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

30[4]

Identified by subject line, of 162 filed to Little Silver Borough

Most recent request

January 2026[4]

First recorded November 2017

Awaiting a response

13[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Little Silver Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response13
Requester reported success12
Requester reported partial success2
Under internal review1
Request refused1
Withdrawn by requester1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Little Silver Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-01-21Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-09-15Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-08-08Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-08-06Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-08-06Requester reported success
  6. 2025-08-06Requester reported success
  7. 2025-05-09Awaiting agency response
  8. 2024-10-04Under internal review
  9. 2024-07-27Request refused
  10. 2024-07-12Awaiting agency response
  11. 2024-05-24Requester reported success
  12. 2024-05-10Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Little Silver Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Little Silver Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

How many internal affairs investigations did Little Silver Police Department report in 2025?

Little Silver Police Department reported 3 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 3 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Little Silver Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Little Silver Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

How many officers does Little Silver Police Department have?

Little Silver Police Department reported 16 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 6.3% of them female. That is 2.63 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Little Silver Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Little Silver Police Department received 29 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2014 and 2019, with a total recorded value of $61,841 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Little Silver Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Little Silver Police Department under the 1033 program totals $61,841 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $61,841 is in categories this site classes as tactical (29 of 29 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Little Silver Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 15 active Little Silver Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $71,319. The median for the 98 TPAF-enrolled staff at LITTLE SILVER BD OF ED is $83,175, a ratio of 0.86x. Against the Monmouth County school-staff median the ratio is 0.82x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2350. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Little Silver Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  6. [6]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8438. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8438. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8438. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8438. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 315. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1334. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2350. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Little Silver PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Little Silver PD row for 2021. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Little Silver PD row for 2022. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Little Silver PD row for 2025. ↩
  17. [17]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8438. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  18. [18]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩