Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Monmouth County

Belmar Police Department

Reported as: Belmar PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Belmar Borough on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Belmar Police Department named 5 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 8 investigations, a rate of 160 per 100 officers for the Monmouth County municipal police department. Both the county median of 125 and the statewide municipal median of 125.9 are lower. A department above the median may be handling more misconduct, or may be recording more of the complaints it receives. Of the 8 investigations detailed for 2025, 1 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, ahead of Differential Treatment and Neglect of Duty.

No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Belmar received a B on the report card, at the 38th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

5[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

8[1]

Incidents, 2025

8[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

25[7]

59 years reported

25 sworn officers in 2025, up from 16 in 1960 (+56%).
Yearsworn officers
196016
1961not reported
1962not reported
1963not reported
1964not reported
1965not reported
1966not reported
1967not reported
196819
196920
197020
197120
197220
197321
197421
197521
197621
197721
197821
197921
198021
198121
198221
198321
198423
198523
198624
198722
198821
198921
199019
199120
199221
199322
199422
199521
199621
199721
199821
199921
200020
200120
200221
200321
200421
200521
200621
200721
200821
200920
201021
201119
201219
201317
201420
201521
201622
201723
201825
201925
202024
202125
202225
202325
202425
202525

Civilian employees, 2025

7[8]

0.28 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

2[9]

8% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

4.28[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Belmar Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
14–1617
16–1820
18–2027
20–2217
22–2426
24–2623
26–2817
28–3019

Belmar Police Department: 25 sworn officers: 75th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 25 active Belmar Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$126,028[3]

25 active officers

Median local school staff

$74,672

BELMAR BORO BD OF ED, 59 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.69x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.45x

Median officer to Monmouth County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "BELMAR BORO BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Monmouth County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Belmar Police Department acquired six recorded line items of federal surplus equipment in 2013 and 2014, with a recorded value of $128,111. That figure is original Department of Defense acquisition cost, not what the equipment would fetch or is worth today. All six line items are in categories this site classes as tactical: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled at $100,916 and Cameras, still picture at $27,195. Quantities are counted separately by unit of issue, and the file lists 4 under Kit and 2 under Each. Transfers received are not a current inventory, because non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Taking part in the surplus program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records. This site's Militarization Index, an analysis and not an official statistic, puts Belmar PD at $5,124 per officer, in the 89th percentile among 167 agencies in the 15-29 officers band; a higher index is not automatically worse.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$128,111[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$128,111[2]

6 of 6 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2013-2014[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 4 (Kit); 2 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Belmar Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled100,916 tactical
Cameras, still picture27,195 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Belmar Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical22 items (Each)$100,916
Cameras, still pictureNight vision and thermal imaging · FSC 6720Tactical44 (Kit)$27,195

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Belmar Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
CAMERA SYSTEM,RECONNAISSANCENSN 6720-01-568-2071Shipped 2014-07-17 · DEMIL DCameras, still picture Tactical1 Kit$8,450
CAMERA SYSTEM,RECONNAISSANCENSN 6720-01-568-1287Shipped 2014-07-17 · DEMIL CCameras, still picture Tactical1 Kit$5,147
CAMERA SYSTEM,RECONNAISSANCENSN 6720-01-568-1287Shipped 2014-07-17 · DEMIL CCameras, still picture Tactical1 Kit$5,147
CAMERA SYSTEM,RECONNAISSANCENSN 6720-01-568-2071Shipped 2014-07-17 · DEMIL DCameras, still picture Tactical1 Kit$8,450
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-128-9551Shipped 2013-09-30 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$50,458
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-128-9551Shipped 2013-09-30 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$50,458

6 of 6 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Belmar Police Department received $5,124 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 89th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (15-29 officers, n=167).

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000148
5000–1000012
10000–150004
15000–200001
20000–250000
25000–300001

Belmar Police Department: 5,124 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 89th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Belmar Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20213
20225
20236
202413
20258

Incidents

8 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20224
20234
202410
20258

Officers on IA rows

8 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202413
20258
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20220
202316.667
20240
202512.5

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 8 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Belmar Police Department, 2025
Demeanor3
Differential Treatment2
Neglect of Duty2
Improper Search1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Demeanor · Differential Treatment · Neglect of Duty · Improper Search

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Belmar Police Department, 2025
Exonerated7
Sustained1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Differential Treatment

9 of 35

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20221
20232
20243
20252

Demeanor

8 of 35

Demeanor allegations reported by Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20222
20231
20241
20253

Excessive Force

6 of 35

Excessive Force allegations reported by Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20220
20231
20244
20250

Improper Arrest

4 of 35

Improper Arrest allegations reported by Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20232
20242
20250

Other (6 categories)

8 of 35

Other (6 categories) allegations reported by Belmar Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20222
20230
20243
20253

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Belmar Police Department160.0
County median, municipal police (41)125.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

8 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 25 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 32.0 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade B: Second-lowest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
38th percentile of 171 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Belmar Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–50120
50–10024
100–15015
150–2007
200–2503
250–3002

Belmar Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 25th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

32nd percentileof 171 peers

112.0 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

25th percentileof 171 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

94th percentileof 171 peers

2.77 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025160.076th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20258245th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20258211th of 445 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$5,12452nd of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year4.2856th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.45x170th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present4838th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Belmar Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 48 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 97 filed to Belmar Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

48[4]

Identified by subject line, of 145 filed to Belmar Borough

Most recent request

January 2026[4]

First recorded October 2017

Awaiting a response

22[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Belmar Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response22
Requester reported success12
Requester reported partial success9
Agency said records not held3
Flagged for attention1
Delivery error1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Belmar Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-01-03Flagged for attention
  2. 2025-12-04Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-12-03Requester reported partial success
  4. 2025-09-15Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-08-18Requester reported partial success
  6. 2025-08-16Awaiting agency response
  7. 2025-08-11Awaiting agency response
  8. 2025-07-30Awaiting agency response
  9. 2025-06-02Awaiting agency response
  10. 2024-11-22Awaiting agency response
  11. 2024-08-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2024-08-29Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Belmar Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Belmar Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Belmar Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Belmar Police Department named 5 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 8 investigations, a rate of 160 per 100 officers for the Monmouth County municipal police department. Both the county median of 125 and the statewide municipal median of 125.9 are lower. A department above the median may be handling more misconduct, or may be recording more of the complaints it receives. Of the 8 investigations detailed for 2025, 1 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, ahead of Differential Treatment and Neglect of Duty. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Belmar received a B on the report card, at the 38th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Belmar Police Department report in 2025?

Belmar Police Department reported 8 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 5 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Belmar Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Belmar Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

How many officers does Belmar Police Department have?

Belmar Police Department reported 25 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 8% of them female. That is 4.28 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Belmar Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Belmar Police Department received 6 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2013 and 2014, with a total recorded value of $128,111 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Belmar Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Belmar Police Department under the 1033 program totals $128,111 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $128,111 is in categories this site classes as tactical (6 of 6 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Belmar Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 25 active Belmar Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $126,028. The median for the 59 TPAF-enrolled staff at BELMAR BORO BD OF ED is $74,672, a ratio of 1.69x. Against the Monmouth County school-staff median the ratio is 1.45x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2335. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Belmar Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Belmar PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8423. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8423. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8423. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8423. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 300. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1317. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1824. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 804. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2335. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Belmar PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Belmar PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Belmar PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Belmar PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Belmar PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Belmar PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8423. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩