Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Monmouth County

Red Bank Police Department

Reported as: Red Bank PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Red Bank Police Department, a municipal police agency in Monmouth County, named 13 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and logged 22 investigations. Its rate of 169.2 per 100 officers ran above the county median of 125 and the 125.9 municipal median, a gap that can point to more misconduct or to a department that documents more of the complaints it receives. Of the 22 investigations detailed for 2025, 5 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, with Demeanor and Differential Treatment next.

Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2024 and 2025. Red Bank received a B on the report card, at the 36th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers band, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

13[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

22[1]

Incidents, 2025

18[1]

Major discipline records

2

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

38[8]

66 years reported

38 sworn officers in 2025, up from 34 in 1960 (+12%).
Yearsworn officers
196034
196133
196234
196332
196434
196535
196635
196734
196834
196938
197040
197140
197240
197341
197441
197541
197641
197746
197845
197944
198045
198144
198244
198343
198444
198543
198643
198740
198843
198942
199043
199143
199240
199340
199439
199539
199640
199739
199837
199939
200039
200138
200240
200340
200439
200540
200641
200741
200842
200942
201040
201137
201240
201337
201440
201540
201640
201739
201839
201939
202039
202138
202238
202338
202438
202538

Civilian employees, 2025

8[9]

0.21 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

3[10]

7.9% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.97[11]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Red Bank Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3538
35–4026
40–4516
45–5014
50–5510
55–607

Red Bank Police Department: 38 sworn officers: 51st percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 39 active Red Bank Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$135,165[3]

39 active officers

Median local school staff

$68,302

RED BANK BD OF ED, 147 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.98x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.55x

Median officer to Monmouth County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "RED BANK BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Monmouth County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Red Bank Police Department received five recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the federal military surplus program between 2013 and 2016. The recorded value totals $143,441, a figure that reflects original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value, and $142,381 of it falls in categories this site classes as tactical. The largest categories by recorded value were Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled at $135,618, Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation at $6,763, and Antennas, waveguides, and related equipment at $1,061. These are transfers the department received over time, not a current inventory: non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$143,441[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$142,381[2]

4 of 5 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2013-2016[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 27 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Red Bank Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled135,618 tactical
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation6,763 tactical
Antennas, waveguides, and related equipment1,061 mundane

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Red Bank Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical22 items (Each)$135,618
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiationNight vision and thermal imaging · FSC 5855Tactical224 items (Each)$6,763
Antennas, waveguides, and related equipmentCommunications and electronics · FSC 5985Mundane11 items (Each)$1,061

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Red Bank Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
MASTNSN 5985-DS-MAS-T000Shipped 2016-05-18 · DEMIL DAntennas, waveguides, and related equipment Mundane1 Each$1,061
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-346-9317Shipped 2015-07-17 · DEMIL QTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$94,171
GRIP,PISTOL,LASERNSN 5855-01-485-4098Shipped 2014-10-10 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical3 Each$845
GRIP,PISTOL,LASERNSN 5855-01-485-4098Shipped 2014-09-12 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical21 Each$5,917
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-146-7193Shipped 2013-11-15 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$41,447

5 of 5 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Red Bank Police Department received $3,747 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 92nd percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Red Bank Police Department: 3,747 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 92nd percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20212
20225
202312
202420
202522

Incidents

18 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20225
202311
202411
202518

Officers on IA rows

22 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202420
202522
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202220
20238.333
202415
202522.727

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 22 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Red Bank Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation8
Demeanor5
Differential Treatment4
Preventable MV Accident2
Excessive Force2
Neglect of Duty1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Demeanor · Differential Treatment · Preventable MV Accident · Excessive Force · Neglect of Duty

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Red Bank Police Department, 2025
Exonerated15
Sustained5
Unfounded1
Not Sustained1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

36 of 61

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20224
202310
202414
20258

Demeanor

8 of 61

Demeanor allegations reported by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20232
20240
20255

Differential Treatment

4 of 61

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20240
20254

Other Criminal Violation

4 of 61

Other Criminal Violation allegations reported by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20244
20250

Other (6 categories)

9 of 61

Other (6 categories) allegations reported by Red Bank Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20220
20230
20242
20255

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Red Bank Police Department169.2
County median, municipal police (41)125.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

22 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 38 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[23] = 57.9 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade B: Second-lowest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
36th percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Red Bank Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Red Bank Police Department: 43.478 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 58th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

52nd percentileof 110 peers

126.4 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

58th percentileof 110 peers

43.5 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

12th percentileof 110 peers

1.70 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[24] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025169.255th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations202522106th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20251899th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20252127th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$3,74763rd of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.97129th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.55x112th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present4146th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20220
20230
20241
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Red Bank Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Thomas DoremusPatrolmanSeparated while IA pending[25]
2024Darren McconnellchiefSuspended 86 days[26]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

One record in the Fatal Encounters dataset names Red Bank Police Department, in 2008. The dataset records the force on it, in its own as-recorded terms, as Gunshot. The dataset comes from Fatal Encounters, an independent crowdsourced journalism project that logged deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, overdoses, and medical emergencies. A record means a death occurred during an encounter with the agency named in the as-reported agency field; it is not a finding of fault. Collection ended in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen at that point and later years are simply not covered.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[4] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Red Bank Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[5] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Red Bank Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 41 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 242 filed to Red Bank Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

41[5]

Identified by subject line, of 283 filed to Red Bank Borough

Most recent request

June 2026[5]

First recorded November 2017

Awaiting a response

16[5]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Red Bank Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response16
Requester reported success13
Requester reported partial success6
Agency said records not held3
Request refused3

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Red Bank Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-06-30Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-11-17Agency said records not held
  3. 2025-10-27Requester reported success
  4. 2025-10-21Requester reported success
  5. 2025-09-15Awaiting agency response
  6. 2025-08-20Requester reported partial success
  7. 2025-08-06Awaiting agency response
  8. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  9. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  10. 2025-05-30Awaiting agency response
  11. 2025-04-28Awaiting agency response
  12. 2025-04-23Request refused
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Red Bank Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Red Bank Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Red Bank Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Red Bank Police Department, a municipal police agency in Monmouth County, named 13 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and logged 22 investigations. Its rate of 169.2 per 100 officers ran above the county median of 125 and the 125.9 municipal median, a gap that can point to more misconduct or to a department that documents more of the complaints it receives. Of the 22 investigations detailed for 2025, 5 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, with Demeanor and Differential Treatment next. Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2024 and 2025. Red Bank received a B on the report card, at the 36th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers band, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Red Bank Police Department report in 2025?

Red Bank Police Department reported 22 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 13 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Red Bank Police Department have?

Red Bank Police Department has 2 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Red Bank Police Department have?

Red Bank Police Department reported 38 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 7.9% of them female. That is 2.97 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Red Bank Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Red Bank Police Department received 5 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2013 and 2016, with a total recorded value of $143,441 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Red Bank Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Red Bank Police Department under the 1033 program totals $143,441 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $142,381 is in categories this site classes as tactical (4 of 5 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Red Bank Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 1 record naming Red Bank Police Department, from 2008 through 2008. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Red Bank Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 39 active Red Bank Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $135,165. The median for the 147 TPAF-enrolled staff at RED BANK BD OF ED is $68,302, a ratio of 1.98x. Against the Monmouth County school-staff median the ratio is 1.55x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2364. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  5. [5]Records-request activity for Red Bank Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Red Bank PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  7. [7]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8454. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8454. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8454. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8454. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 331. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1349. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1853. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 833. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2364. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Red Bank PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Red Bank PD row for 2021. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Red Bank PD row for 2022. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Red Bank PD row for 2023. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Red Bank PD row for 2024. ↩
  22. [22]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Red Bank PD row for 2025. ↩
  23. [23]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8454. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  24. [24]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 479. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  26. [26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1215. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩