Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Monmouth County

Tinton Falls Police Department

Reported as: Tinton Falls PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

Radio encryption

Tinton Falls Police Department encrypts its radio communications (P25 AES-256, all operations), according to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, as of 2026-04-21 (unverified).

AnalysisThis site treats radio encryption as a meaningful transparency signal. When a department closes its radio traffic to the public, the public loses a real-time window into how it operates. That is context for reading the discipline and internal affairs records on this page, not a figure drawn from them.

In brief

Tinton Falls Police Department logged 61 internal affairs investigations in 2025, the most in any reported year, with 33 officers named in those cases. The rate of 184.8 per 100 officers ran far above the Monmouth County median of 125 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. That distance can reflect more misconduct or a department that documents more of its complaints. Of the 61 investigations detailed for 2025, 11 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, followed by Demeanor and Differential Treatment.

Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2024 and 2025, including one termination. Tinton Falls received a D on the report card, at the 60th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

33[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

61[1]

Incidents, 2025

35[1]

Major discipline records

2

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

45[7]

62 years reported

45 sworn officers in 2025, up from 6 in 1962 (+650%).
Yearsworn officers
19626
1963not reported
19647
19657
19667
1967not reported
19689
19699
197012
197112
197213
197314
197416
197517
197616
197718
197816
197917
198017
198116
198217
198318
198420
198519
198621
198724
198828
198932
199032
199131
199231
199330
199430
199530
199630
199732
199833
199935
200035
200137
200238
200339
200440
200541
200641
200740
200840
200941
201034
201137
201235
201338
201438
201540
201641
201741
201841
201941
202042
202143
202242
202345
202445
202545

Civilian employees, 2025

2[8]

0.04 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

5[9]

11.1% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.31[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Tinton Falls Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3538
35–4027
40–4516
45–5013
50–5510
55–607

Tinton Falls Police Department: 45 sworn officers: 74th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 44 active Tinton Falls Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$130,340[3]

44 active officers

Median school staff

$86,935

Monmouth County, all TPAF members

Against the county

1.50x

Median officer to Monmouth County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Monmouth County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Tinton Falls Police Department received eight recorded line items of surplus military equipment in 2014 through the federal surplus-equipment program, with a total recorded value of $48,670 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. Categories this site classes as tactical account for $12,697 of that total, a minority of the recorded value. The largest category was Miscellaneous aircraft accessories and components at $35,972, followed by Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation at $6,866 and Optical sighting and ranging equipment at $4,068. These are transfers received, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$48,670[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$12,697[2]

7 of 8 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2014[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 60 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Tinton Falls Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Miscellaneous aircraft accessories and components35,972 mundane
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation6,866 tactical
Optical sighting and ranging equipment4,068 tactical
Armor, personal1,117 tactical
Guns, through 30mm647 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Tinton Falls Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiationNight vision and thermal imaging · FSC 5855Tactical22 items (Each)$6,866
Optical sighting and ranging equipmentWeapon optics and sights · FSC 1240Tactical312 items (Each)$4,068
Armor, personalBody armor and shields · FSC 8470Tactical11 items (Each)$1,117
Guns, through 30mmWeapons · FSC 1005Tactical140 items (Each)$647
Miscellaneous aircraft accessories and componentsUtility vehicles and parts · FSC 1680Mundane15 items (Each)$35,972

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Tinton Falls Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
PAN AND TILT ASSEMBLY,THERMAL VIEWERNSN 5855-01-511-2652Shipped 2014-07-08 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$3,433
PAN AND TILT ASSEMBLY,THERMAL VIEWERNSN 5855-01-511-2652Shipped 2014-07-08 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$3,433
SIGHT,REFLEXNSN 1240-01-411-1265Shipped 2014-03-11 · DEMIL QOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical2 Each$678
MAGAZINE,CARTRIDGENSN 1005-01-561-7200Shipped 2014-03-05 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical40 Each$647
SIGHT,REFLEXNSN 1240-01-411-1265Shipped 2014-03-05 · DEMIL QOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical5 Each$1,695
BALLISTIC SHIELDSNSN 8470-01-386-2970Shipped 2014-02-25 · DEMIL DArmor, personal Tactical1 Each$1,117
PARTS KIT,WINCH,OVENSN 1680-00-874-9386Shipped 2014-02-07 · DEMIL QMiscellaneous aircraft accessories and components Mundane5 Each$35,972
SIGHT,REFLEXNSN 1240-01-411-1265Shipped 2014-01-17 · DEMIL QOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical5 Each$1,695

8 of 8 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Tinton Falls Police Department received $282 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 74th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Tinton Falls Police Department: 282 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 74th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
202127
202236
202338
202454
202561

Incidents

35 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202120
202228
202319
202432
202535

Officers on IA rows

59 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202451
202559
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202227.778
202313.158
202429.63
202518.033

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 59 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation33
Demeanor21
Differential Treatment4
Theft2
not provided1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Demeanor · Differential Treatment · Theft

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, 2025
Exonerated33
Not Sustained11
Sustained11
Unfounded4
Administratively Closed2

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

113 of 216

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202114
202227
202328
202411
202533

Demeanor

57 of 216

Demeanor allegations reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20217
20225
20239
202415
202521

Differential Treatment

18 of 216

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20231
202412
20254

Loss Of Or Failure To Safeguard Agency Propert

9 of 216

Loss Of Or Failure To Safeguard Agency Propert allegations reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20249
20250

Other (6 categories)

19 of 216

Other (6 categories) allegations reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20216
20223
20230
20247
20253

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Tinton Falls Police Department184.8
County median, municipal police (41)125.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

61 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 45 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 135.6 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade D: Second-highest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
60th percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Tinton Falls Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Tinton Falls Police Department: 22.388 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 43rd percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

96th percentileof 110 peers

159.5 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

43rd percentileof 110 peers

22.4 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

3rd percentileof 110 peers

1.61 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025184.838th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20256131st of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20253543rd of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20252127th of 282 municipal police
Terminations2020-2025130th of 111 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$282124th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.31244th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.50x143rd of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present3086th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20220
20230
20241
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Tinton Falls Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Robert WilsonSergeantTerminated[24]
2024Anthony TursoLieutenantSuspended 30 days[25]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Tinton Falls Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 30 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 112 filed to Tinton Falls Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

30[4]

Identified by subject line, of 142 filed to Tinton Falls Borough

Most recent request

September 2025[4]

First recorded November 2017

Awaiting a response

14[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Tinton Falls Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response14
Requester reported success8
Request refused6
Requester reported partial success1
Withdrawn by requester1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Tinton Falls Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-09-15Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-08-22Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-04-28Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-03-01Requester reported success
  6. 2024-12-13Awaiting agency response
  7. 2024-09-28Awaiting agency response
  8. 2024-09-23Requester reported success
  9. 2024-09-05Requester reported success
  10. 2024-05-30Awaiting agency response
  11. 2023-09-04Request refused
  12. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Tinton Falls Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Tinton Falls Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Tinton Falls Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Tinton Falls Police Department logged 61 internal affairs investigations in 2025, the most in any reported year, with 33 officers named in those cases. The rate of 184.8 per 100 officers ran far above the Monmouth County median of 125 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. That distance can reflect more misconduct or a department that documents more of its complaints. Of the 61 investigations detailed for 2025, 11 reported sustained complaints. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, followed by Demeanor and Differential Treatment. Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2024 and 2025, including one termination. Tinton Falls received a D on the report card, at the 60th percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Tinton Falls Police Department report in 2025?

Tinton Falls Police Department reported 61 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 33 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Tinton Falls Police Department have?

Tinton Falls Police Department has 2 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 1 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

Does Tinton Falls Police Department encrypt its radio communications?

According to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, Tinton Falls Police Department encrypts all of its radio communications (P25 AES-256), as recorded on 2026-04-21. This site treats radio encryption as a transparency signal, which is analysis, not a figure from the discipline data.

How many officers does Tinton Falls Police Department have?

Tinton Falls Police Department reported 45 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 11.1% of them female. That is 2.31 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Tinton Falls Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Tinton Falls Police Department received 8 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program in 2014, with a total recorded value of $48,670 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Miscellaneous aircraft accessories and components. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Tinton Falls Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Tinton Falls Police Department under the 1033 program totals $48,670 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $12,697 is in categories this site classes as tactical (7 of 8 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Tinton Falls Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 44 active Tinton Falls Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $130,340. Against the Monmouth County school-staff median the ratio is 1.50x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2370. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Tinton Falls Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Tinton Falls PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8450. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8450. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8450. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8450. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 337. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1353. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1859. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 840. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2370. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Tinton Falls PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Tinton Falls PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Tinton Falls PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Tinton Falls PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Tinton Falls PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Tinton Falls PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8450. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 482. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1218. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩