Department profile · Mercer County
Mercer County Sheriff's Department
Reported as: Mercer Co Sheriffs DeptCounty sheriff
Jurisdiction context
Civil service jurisdiction
Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Mercer County on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.
Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.
Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.
Radio encryption
Mercer County Sheriff's Department encrypts its radio communications (P25 AES-256, part of its operations (All Operations except park rangers TG)), according to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, as of 2026-04-21 (unverified).
Officers named in IA cases, 2025
4[1]
Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing
IA investigations, 2025
4[1]
Incidents, 2025
4[1]
Major discipline records
4
All years, 2020-2025
Staffing
Staffing data not available. The FBI's national staffing census (LEE) does not separately track county corrections facilities, sheriff's offices, or other county agencies in New Jersey -- only a single statewide Department of Corrections figure exists in that data. See the methodology for what FBI staffing data does and does not cover.
Military surplus equipment (1033 program)
No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.
Internal affairs investigations by year
counts
| Category | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 |
| 2022 | 21 |
| 2023 | 18 |
| 2025 | 4 |
Incidents
4 in 2025
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 20 |
| 2023 | 17 |
| 2025 | 4 |
Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.
share of total · 4 reported years
| Year | share of total |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 66.667 |
| 2023 | 50 |
| 2025 | 75 |
Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.
Complaint mix, 2025
Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 4 officers involved.
Most serious allegation
| Other Departmental Rule Violation | 2 |
|---|---|
| Improper Arrest | 1 |
| Demeanor | 1 |
Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Improper Arrest · Demeanor
Internal disposition
| Sustained | 3 |
|---|---|
| Unfounded | 1 |
Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation
16 of 48
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 3 |
| 2023 | 7 |
| 2024 | not reported |
| 2025 | 2 |
Attendance issues
12 of 48
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 9 |
| 2023 | 3 |
| 2024 | not reported |
| 2025 | 0 |
Demeanor
8 of 48
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | not reported |
| 2025 | 1 |
Neglect of Duty
3 of 48
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | not reported |
| 2025 | 0 |
Other (7 categories)
9 of 48
| Year | counts |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3 |
| 2023 | 5 |
| 2024 | not reported |
| 2025 | 1 |
Against peers, 2025
How this grade was built →| Mercer County Sheriff's Department | 100.0 |
|---|---|
| County median, county sheriff (1) | 100.0 |
| NJ median, county sheriff (20) | 115.2 |
Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.
Report card
Grade B: Second-lowest fifth
On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology
- Combined standing
- 36th percentile of 21 peers
- Confidence
- Medium confidence
- small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases
Where this agency falls among its peers
The actual spread of discipline severity across Mercer County Sheriff's Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.
Peer group: County sheriff, all sheriff agencies (n=21)
| Range | Agencies |
|---|---|
| 0–50 | 6 |
| 50–100 | 8 |
| 100–150 | 6 |
| 150–200 | 0 |
| 200–250 | 1 |
Mercer County Sheriff's Department: 76.19 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 60th percentile among County sheriff, all sheriff agencies (n=21).
How the grade is built
Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.
IA volumeweight 40%
109.0 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)
Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.
Discipline severityweight 40%
76.2 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025
Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.
Allegation severityweight 20%
1.51 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)
Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.
What this grade can and can't tell you
- The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
- Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
- There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
- A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
- The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.
Where this agency ranks
| Metric | Value | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| IA per 100 investigated officers2025 | 100.0 | 15th of 20 county sheriff |
| IA investigations2025 | 4 | 17th of 20 county sheriff |
| IA incidents2025 | 4 | 16th of 20 county sheriff |
| Major discipline2020-2025 | 4 | 11th of 17 county sheriff |
Major discipline records
| Year | major discipline records |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0 |
0 major discipline records in 2025, down from 2 in 2020 (-100%).
Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.
Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency
From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021
In brief (written by this site from the records below)
Three records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Mercer County Sheriff's Department, spanning 2001 through 2018. The force labels, as recorded by the project, are Gunshot in three of them. Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced journalism project that documented deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, deaths in police presence, and medical emergencies. A record is not a finding of fault against the agency or any officer, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records elsewhere on this page. The project stopped collecting in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen and nothing after that date appears here.
Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[2] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Mercer County Sheriff's Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.
- Scott Mielentz
March 20, 2018 · Princeton · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot
- Robert Powell Jr.
May 10, 2017 · Trenton · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot
- Danny Larkin
June 30, 2001 · Hamilton Township · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot
Public records requests
No records-request history is shown for this department. OPRAmachine, an independent site that files and publishes Open Public Records Act requests, has no public body that confidently matches this department, so this site does not assert one. That does not mean nobody has requested records from it. (Checked against a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken 12 July 2026.) See the methodology for how the match is made.
Questions and answers
How many internal affairs investigations did Mercer County Sheriff's Department report in 2025?
Mercer County Sheriff's Department reported 4 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 4 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.
How many major discipline records does Mercer County Sheriff's Department have?
Mercer County Sheriff's Department has 4 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.
Does Mercer County Sheriff's Department encrypt its radio communications?
According to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, Mercer County Sheriff's Department encrypts part of its radio communications (P25 AES-256), as recorded on 2026-04-21. This site treats radio encryption as a transparency signal, which is analysis, not a figure from the discipline data.
How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Mercer County Sheriff's Department?
The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 3 records naming Mercer County Sheriff's Department, from 2001 through 2018. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.
Sources
- [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2295. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [2]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
- [3]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
- [4]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 263. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1280. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1783. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [7]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2295. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [8]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Mercer Co Sheriffs Dept row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
- [9]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Mercer Co Sheriffs Dept row for 2021. ↩
- [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Mercer Co Sheriffs Dept row for 2022. ↩
- [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Mercer Co Sheriffs Dept row for 2023. ↩
- [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Mercer Co Sheriffs Dept row for 2025. ↩
- [13]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
- [14]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1148. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
- [15]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1149. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
- [16]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2875. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
- [17]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2876. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩