Department profile · Camden County
Oaklyn Borough Police Department
Reported as: Oaklyn Boro PDMunicipal police
Jurisdiction context
Not a civil service jurisdiction
This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.
See the context on non-civil-service departments.
Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.
In brief
Oaklyn Borough Police Department reported 15 internal affairs investigations in 2025 with 9 officers named in those cases, a rate of 166.7 per 100 officers. The Camden County median is 142.2 and the statewide municipal median is 125.9, and a department above both may be handling more misconduct or documenting more of what is alleged. Of the 15 investigations detailed for 2025, 6 reported sustained complaints. Harassment/Stalking was the leading allegation category, with Differential Treatment and Demeanor next. Allegations are not findings.
No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Oaklyn Boro PD received a D on the report card, at the 72nd percentile among 100 peers in the 1-14 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.
Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.
Officers named in IA cases, 2025
9[1]
Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing
IA investigations, 2025
15[1]
Incidents, 2025
14[1]
Major discipline records
0
All years, 2020-2025
Staffing
As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.
Sworn officers, 2023
13[5]
62 years reported
| Year | sworn officers |
|---|---|
| 1960 | 6 |
| 1961 | 7 |
| 1962 | 7 |
| 1963 | 7 |
| 1964 | 6 |
| 1965 | 6 |
| 1966 | not reported |
| 1967 | not reported |
| 1968 | 6 |
| 1969 | 6 |
| 1970 | 6 |
| 1971 | 6 |
| 1972 | 7 |
| 1973 | 7 |
| 1974 | 7 |
| 1975 | 8 |
| 1976 | 8 |
| 1977 | 8 |
| 1978 | 6 |
| 1979 | 6 |
| 1980 | 8 |
| 1981 | 7 |
| 1982 | 7 |
| 1983 | 7 |
| 1984 | 7 |
| 1985 | 7 |
| 1986 | 7 |
| 1987 | 8 |
| 1988 | 7 |
| 1989 | 7 |
| 1990 | 8 |
| 1991 | 8 |
| 1992 | 8 |
| 1993 | 8 |
| 1994 | 9 |
| 1995 | 9 |
| 1996 | 10 |
| 1997 | 11 |
| 1998 | 12 |
| 1999 | 11 |
| 2000 | 12 |
| 2001 | 12 |
| 2002 | 13 |
| 2003 | 14 |
| 2004 | 15 |
| 2005 | 15 |
| 2006 | 13 |
| 2007 | 12 |
| 2008 | 12 |
| 2009 | 12 |
| 2010 | 12 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2012 | 12 |
| 2013 | 12 |
| 2014 | 12 |
| 2015 | 13 |
| 2016 | 15 |
| 2017 | 16 |
| 2018 | 15 |
| 2019 | 16 |
| 2020 | 16 |
| 2021 | 12 |
| 2022 | 13 |
| 2023 | 13 |
How Oaklyn Borough Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.
Peer group: Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100)
Oaklyn Borough Police Department: 13 sworn officers: 79th percentile among Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100).
| Range | Agencies |
|---|---|
| 0–2 | 13 |
| 2–4 | 3 |
| 4–6 | 1 |
| 6–8 | 17 |
| 8–10 | 11 |
| 10–12 | 15 |
| 12–14 | 40 |
The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.
Officer pay and school-staff pay
County comparisonA separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 15 active Oaklyn Borough Police Department officers in the file.
Median local school staff
$68,851
OAKLYN BOROUGH BD OF ED, 36 TPAF members
Against the local district
1.12x
Median officer to median local school staff
Against the county
0.91x
Median officer to Camden County school-staff median
Military surplus equipment (1033 program)
No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.
Internal affairs investigations by year
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 15 |
Complaint mix, 2025
Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 15 officers involved.
Most serious allegation
| Harassment/Stalking | 4 |
|---|---|
| Differential Treatment | 3 |
| Demeanor | 3 |
| Other Criminal Violation | 2 |
| Insubordination/Disobeying An Order | 1 |
| Excessive Force | 1 |
| Attendance Issues | 1 |
Internal disposition
| Sustained | 6 |
|---|---|
| Not Sustained | 5 |
| not provided | 3 |
| Exonerated | 1 |
Against peers, 2025
How this grade was built →| Oaklyn Borough Police Department | 166.7 |
|---|---|
| County median, municipal police (34) | 142.2 |
| NJ median, municipal police (445) | 125.9 |
Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.
15 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 13 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2023[15] = 115.4 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers (different years -- 2025 investigations against 2023 staffing -- so treat this figure as more approximate than the one above). This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.
Report card
Grade D: Second-highest fifth
On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology
- Combined standing
- 72nd percentile of 100 peers
- Confidence
- Medium confidence
- small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases
Where this agency falls among its peers
The actual spread of discipline severity across Oaklyn Borough Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.
Peer group: Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100)
Oaklyn Borough Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 34th percentile among Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=100).
| Range | Agencies |
|---|---|
| 0–50 | 74 |
| 50–100 | 6 |
| 100–150 | 8 |
| 150–200 | 2 |
| 200–250 | 4 |
| 250–300 | 2 |
| 300–350 | 4 |
How the grade is built
Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.
IA volumeweight 40%
152.3 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)
Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.
Discipline severityweight 40%
0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025
Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.
Allegation severityweight 20%
2.34 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)
Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.
What this grade can and can't tell you
- The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
- Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
- There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
- A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
- The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.
Major discipline records
No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.
Public records requests
Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[3] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.
Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.
This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Oaklyn Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 20 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 90 filed to Oaklyn Borough are about something else and are not shown.
What happened to those requests
Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.
| Awaiting agency response | 15 |
|---|---|
| Requester reported success | 2 |
| Flagged for attention | 1 |
| Awaiting clarification | 1 |
| Requester reported partial success | 1 |
Recent requests
The 12 most recent police-related requests to Oaklyn Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.
- 2026-03-06Awaiting agency response
- 2026-02-27Awaiting agency response
- 2026-02-12Awaiting agency response
- 2025-08-16Awaiting agency response
- 2025-08-16Flagged for attention
- 2025-04-29Awaiting agency response
- 2025-04-29Awaiting agency response
- 2024-09-04Awaiting agency response
- 2024-08-31Awaiting agency response
- 2024-08-29Awaiting agency response
- 2024-04-18Awaiting clarification
- 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it
These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.
A member of the public requested: “Requesting body cam from officer James Bonilla on 3/5/2026 responding to door to door solicitors in the early afternoon”
2026-03-06 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “BWC request for Case # 2025010200”
2026-02-27 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Body Worn Camera Footage”
2026-02-12 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case #2023001285”
2025-08-16 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case #2023009052”
2025-08-16 · Flagged for attention
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case #20233008562”
2025-04-29 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case #2023000020”
2025-04-29 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case 2024002817”
2024-09-04 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case 2024003358”
2024-08-31 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case 2024003358”
2024-08-29 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case #2021003165”
2024-04-18 · Awaiting clarification
A member of the public requested: “Purchase order history for the police department from 2020 - 2023”
2023-08-31 · Awaiting agency response
File your own records request
Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.
File an OPRA request about this department
See every request filed to Oaklyn Borough on OPRAmachine.
What this section can and can't tell you
- A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
- Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
- Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
- This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
- It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
- The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Oaklyn Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.
The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.
Questions and answers
What is a summary of Oaklyn Borough Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?
Oaklyn Borough Police Department reported 15 internal affairs investigations in 2025 with 9 officers named in those cases, a rate of 166.7 per 100 officers. The Camden County median is 142.2 and the statewide municipal median is 125.9, and a department above both may be handling more misconduct or documenting more of what is alleged. Of the 15 investigations detailed for 2025, 6 reported sustained complaints. Harassment/Stalking was the leading allegation category, with Differential Treatment and Demeanor next. Allegations are not findings. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Oaklyn Boro PD received a D on the report card, at the 72nd percentile among 100 peers in the 1-14 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.
How many internal affairs investigations did Oaklyn Borough Police Department report in 2025?
Oaklyn Borough Police Department reported 15 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 9 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.
How many major discipline records does Oaklyn Borough Police Department have?
No major discipline records appear for Oaklyn Borough Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.
How many officers does Oaklyn Borough Police Department have?
Oaklyn Borough Police Department reported 13 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2023, 7.7% of them female. That is 3.3 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.
What does Oaklyn Borough Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?
The median pensionable salary for the 15 active Oaklyn Borough Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $76,882. The median for the 36 TPAF-enrolled staff at OAKLYN BOROUGH BD OF ED is $68,851, a ratio of 1.12x. Against the Camden County school-staff median the ratio is 0.91x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.
Sources
- [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2182. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
- [3]Records-request activity for Oaklyn Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
- [4]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
- [5]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 39647. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [6]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 39647. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 39647. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 39647. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
- [9]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 150. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1165. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1676. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 657. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2182. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Oaklyn Boro PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
- [15]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 39647. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩