Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Bergen County

Oakland Police Department

Reported as: Oakland PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Oakland Borough on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

Radio encryption

Oakland Police Department encrypts its radio communications (P25 AES-256, part of its operations (Some Operations)), according to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, as of 2026-04-21 (unverified).

AnalysisThis site treats radio encryption as a meaningful transparency signal. When a department closes its radio traffic to the public, the public loses a real-time window into how it operates. That is context for reading the discipline and internal affairs records on this page, not a figure drawn from them.

In brief

Oakland Police Department named 1 officer in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 1 investigation, a rate of 100 per 100 officers, under the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 municipal median statewide. A rate below the median can mean less misconduct, or a thinner record of complaints. Of the 1 investigation detailed for 2025, 1 reported sustained complaints. The allegation category listed was Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency.

Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2020 and 2022. Oakland PD received a D on the report card, at the 76th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

1[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

1[1]

Incidents, 2025

1[1]

Major discipline records

2

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

23[7]

64 years reported

23 sworn officers in 2025, up from 7 in 1961 (+229%).
Yearsworn officers
19617
19629
196313
196413
196514
1966not reported
196718
196823
196923
197024
197126
197226
197327
197428
197529
197629
197728
197829
197929
198028
198129
198228
198328
198430
198530
198628
198728
198830
198928
199030
199131
199229
199329
199429
199529
199628
199726
199826
199925
200024
200127
200229
200329
200430
200528
200623
200726
200826
200925
201026
201125
201225
201322
201424
201524
201623
201724
201827
201927
202028
202127
202227
202329
202429
202523

Civilian employees, 2025

6[8]

0.26 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

1[9]

4.3% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

1.77[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Oakland Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
14–1617
16–1820
18–2027
20–2217
22–2425
24–2624
26–2817
28–3019

Oakland Police Department: 23 sworn officers: 61st percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 24 active Oakland Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$98,557[3]

24 active officers

Median local school staff

$95,267

OAKLAND BD OF ED, 171 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.03x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.08x

Median officer to Bergen County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "OAKLAND BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Bergen County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Oakland Police Department received 10 recorded line items with ship years from 2022 to 2026, recorded at $78,437 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. Categories this site classes as tactical account for $70,038 of that. The leading entries were Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled at $63,682, Sets, kits, and outfits of hand tools at $5,963, and Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation at $5,314. These are transfers the department received, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$78,437[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$70,038[2]

4 of 10 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2022-2026[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 40 items (Each); 13 (Kit); 12 (Pair). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Oakland Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled63,682 tactical
Sets, kits, and outfits of hand tools5,963 mundane
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation5,314 tactical
Replenishable field medical sets, kits, and outfits1,492 mundane
Guns, through 30mm1,042 tactical
Clothing, special purpose744 mundane
Training aids200 mundane

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Oakland Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical11 items (Each)$63,682
Night vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiationNight vision and thermal imaging · FSC 5855Tactical11 items (Each)$5,314
Guns, through 30mmWeapons · FSC 1005Tactical231 items (Each)$1,042
Sets, kits, and outfits of hand toolsTools and maintenance · FSC 5180Mundane23 (Kit)$5,963
Replenishable field medical sets, kits, and outfitsMedical · FSC 6545Mundane210 (Kit); 5 items (Each)$1,492
Clothing, special purposeClothing and gear · FSC 8415Mundane112 (Pair)$744
Training aidsTraining equipment · FSC 6910Mundane12 items (Each)$200

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Oakland Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
TOOL KIT,AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCENSN 5180-01-587-8129Shipped 2026-05-08 · DEMIL ASets, kits, and outfits of hand tools Mundane2 Kit$3,440
TOOL KIT,AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCENSN 5180-01-628-2372Shipped 2026-05-08 · DEMIL ASets, kits, and outfits of hand tools Mundane1 Kit$2,523
FIRST AID KIT,UNIVERSALNSN 6545-01-530-0929Shipped 2026-05-08 · DEMIL AReplenishable field medical sets, kits, and outfits Mundane10 Kit$487
FIRST AID KIT,UNIVERSAL,UCPNSN 6545-01-667-5039Shipped 2026-05-08 · DEMIL AReplenishable field medical sets, kits, and outfits Mundane5 Each$1,005
GLOVES,COLD WEATHERNSN 8415-01-655-8507Shipped 2026-05-08 · DEMIL AClothing, special purpose Mundane12 Pair$744
BIPOD,RIFLENSN 1005-01-541-1772Shipped 2022-06-17 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical5 Each$622
SIGHT,NIGHT VISION SNIPERSCOPENSN 5855-01-474-8904Shipped 2022-05-06 · DEMIL DNight vision equipment, emitted and reflected radiation Tactical1 Each$5,314
MAGAZINE,CARTRIDGENSN 1005-01-561-7200Shipped 2022-04-15 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical26 Each$420
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-371-9583Shipped 2022-04-15 · DEMIL QTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$63,682
TRAINING AID,SMALL ARMS WEAPONNSN 6910-01-577-7066Shipped 2022-04-14 · DEMIL QTraining aids Mundane2 Each$200

10 of 10 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Oakland Police Department received $3,045 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 84th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (15-29 officers, n=167).

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000147
5000–1000013
10000–150004
15000–200001
20000–250000
25000–300001

Oakland Police Department: 3,045 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 84th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Oakland Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20213
20221
20237
20244
20251

Incidents

1 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20221
20233
20243
20251

Officers on IA rows

1 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20244
20251
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20220
20230
20240
2025100

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 1 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Oakland Police Department, 2025
Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Oakland Police Department, 2025
Sustained1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

5 of 16

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20220
20232
20242
20250

Excessive Force

4 of 16

Excessive Force allegations reported by Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20234
20240
20250

Other Criminal Violation

2 of 16

Other Criminal Violation allegations reported by Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20221
20230
20240
20250

Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency

1 of 16

Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency allegations reported by Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20240
20251

Other (4 categories)

4 of 16

Other (4 categories) allegations reported by Oakland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20220
20231
20242
20250

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Oakland Police Department100.0
County median, municipal police (60)125.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

1 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 23 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 4.3 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade D: Second-highest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
76th percentile of 171 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Oakland Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–50120
50–10024
100–15015
150–2007
200–2503
250–3002

Oakland Police Department: 142.857 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 93rd percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

23rd percentileof 171 peers

108.0 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

93rd percentileof 171 peers

142.9 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

89th percentileof 171 peers

2.60 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025100.0322nd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20251410th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20251405th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20252127th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$3,04570th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year1.77376th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.08x346th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present17232nd of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

0 major discipline records in 2025, down from 1 in 2020 (-100%).
Yearmajor discipline records
20201
20210
20221
20230
20240
20250

0 major discipline records in 2025, down from 1 in 2020 (-100%).

Major discipline records reported by Oakland Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2022Donald HarveyOfficerSuspended 10 days[24]
2020Andrew VecchioneOfficerSuspended 82 days[25]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Oakland Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 17 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 93 filed to Oakland Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

17[4]

Identified by subject line, of 110 filed to Oakland Borough

Most recent request

December 2025[4]

First recorded December 2018

Awaiting a response

13[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Oakland Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response13
Agency said records not held1
Requester reported success1
Requester reported partial success1
Under internal review1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Oakland Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-12-15Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-10-05Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-09-13Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-06-22Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-04-30Agency said records not held
  6. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  7. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  8. 2023-08-30Requester reported success
  9. 2022-03-23Awaiting agency response
  10. 2021-04-20Awaiting agency response
  11. 2020-08-13Awaiting agency response
  12. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Oakland Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Oakland Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Oakland Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Oakland Police Department named 1 officer in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 1 investigation, a rate of 100 per 100 officers, under the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 municipal median statewide. A rate below the median can mean less misconduct, or a thinner record of complaints. Of the 1 investigation detailed for 2025, 1 reported sustained complaints. The allegation category listed was Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency. Two major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2020 and 2022. Oakland PD received a D on the report card, at the 76th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Oakland Police Department report in 2025?

Oakland Police Department reported 1 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 1 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Oakland Police Department have?

Oakland Police Department has 2 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

Does Oakland Police Department encrypt its radio communications?

According to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, Oakland Police Department encrypts part of its radio communications (P25 AES-256), as recorded on 2026-04-21. This site treats radio encryption as a transparency signal, which is analysis, not a figure from the discipline data.

How many officers does Oakland Police Department have?

Oakland Police Department reported 23 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 4.3% of them female. That is 1.77 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Oakland Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Oakland Police Department received 10 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2022 and 2026, with a total recorded value of $78,437 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Oakland Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Oakland Police Department under the 1033 program totals $78,437 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $70,038 is in categories this site classes as tactical (4 of 10 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Oakland Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 24 active Oakland Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $98,557. The median for the 171 TPAF-enrolled staff at OAKLAND BD OF ED is $95,267, a ratio of 1.03x. Against the Bergen County school-staff median the ratio is 1.08x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2095. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Oakland Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Oakland PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8171. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8171. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8171. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8171. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 61. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1078. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1589. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 570. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2095. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Oakland PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Oakland PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Oakland PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Oakland PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Oakland PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Oakland PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8171. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2058. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2798. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩