Department profile · Hunterdon County

Clinton Township Police Department

Reported as: Clinton Twp PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Clinton Twp accounts for 12 major discipline records across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025, including 4 terminations. It received an F on the report card, at the 99th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

14^{^[1]}

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

29^{^[1]}

Incidents, 2025

22^{^[1]}

Major discipline records

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

27^{^[7]}

58 years reported

27 sworn officers in 2025, up from 2 in 1967 (+1250%).
Year	sworn officers
1967	2
1968	2
1969	2
1970	2
1971	3
1972	5
1973	6
1974	8
1975	10
1976	12
1977	11
1978	11
1979	12
1980	11
1981	11
1982	11
1983	13
1984	13
1985	13
1986	16
1987	16
1988	18
1989	18
1990	21
1991	20
1992	17
1993	17
1994	20
1995	20
1996	21
1997	21
1998	24
1999	21
2000	23
2001	17
2002	20
2003	22
2004	22
2005	21
2006	23
2007	24
2008	27
2009	26
2010	26
2011	24
2012	23
2013	23
2014	21
2015	23
2016	22
2017	22
2018	22
2019	22
2020	23
2021	26
2022	24
2023	28
2024	not reported
2025	27

Civilian employees, 2025

3^{^[8]}

0.11 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

3^{^[9]}

11.1% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.02^{^[10]}

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Clinton Township Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
Range	Agencies
14–16	17
16–18	20
18–20	27
20–22	17
22–24	26
24–26	24
26–28	16
28–30	19

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Clinton Township Police Department: 27 sworn officers: 86th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 24 active Clinton Township Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$128,294^{^[2]}

24 active officers

Median local school staff

$82,120

CLINTON TWP BD OF ED, 151 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.56x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.55x

Median officer to Hunterdon County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "CLINTON TWP BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Hunterdon County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Category	counts
2021	10
2022	17
2023	42
2024	44
2025	29

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Incidents

22 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	counts
2021	10
2022	14
2023	42
2024	30
2025	22

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Officers on IA rows

29 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	counts
2021	not reported
2022	not reported
2023	not reported
2024	39
2025	29

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	share of total
2021	0
2022	52.941
2023	30.952
2024	29.545
2025	34.483

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 29 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Clinton Township Police Department, 2025
Demeanor	7
Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency	7
Neglect of Duty	4
Excessive Force	3
False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal)	2
Improper Arrest	2
Other Departmental Rule Violation	1
Differential Treatment	1

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Demeanor · Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency · Neglect of Duty · Excessive Force · False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal) · Improper Arrest · Other Departmental Rule Violation · Differential Treatment

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Clinton Township Police Department, 2025
Exonerated	11
Sustained	10
Not Sustained	5
not provided	2
Unfounded	1

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

45 of 142

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	counts
2021	7
2022	7
2023	14
2024	16
2025	1

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency

14 of 142

Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency allegations reported by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	counts
2021	0
2022	0
2023	5
2024	2
2025	7

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Demeanor

13 of 142

Demeanor allegations reported by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	counts
2021	2
2022	0
2023	1
2024	3
2025	7

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Neglect of Duty

12 of 142

Neglect of Duty allegations reported by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	counts
2021	0
2022	2
2023	6
2024	0
2025	4

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Other (19 categories)

58 of 142

Other (19 categories) allegations reported by Clinton Township Police Department, by year
Year	counts
2021	1
2022	8
2023	16
2024	23
2025	10

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →

Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Clinton Township Police Department	207.1
County median, municipal police (14)	129.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)	125.9

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

29 investigations reported for 2025^[1] ÷ 27 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025^[22] = 107.4 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade F: Highest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing: 99th percentile of 171 peers
Confidence: Medium confidence

small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Clinton Township Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
Range	Agencies
0–50	120
50–100	24
100–150	15
150–200	7
200–250	3
250–300	2

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Clinton Township Police Department: 250 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 99th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

100th percentileof 171 peers

203.2 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

99th percentileof 171 peers

250.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

51st percentileof 171 peers

2.03 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.^[23] How each metric is defined.

This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
Metric	Value	Rank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025	207.1	18th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations2025	29	77th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents2025	22	84th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-2025	12	15th of 282 municipal police
Terminations2020-2025	4	7th of 111 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year	2.02	313th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-31	1.55x	115th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present	22	156th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

5 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Year	major discipline records
2020	0
2021	0
2022	0
2023	2
2024	5
2025	5

5 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Clinton Township Police Department, 2020-2025
Year	Officer	Rank	Sanction as reported	Src
2025	Lawrence Anthes	Patrolman	Separated while IA pending	^[24]
2025	Lawrence Anthes	Patrolman	Separated while IA pending	^[25]
2025	Lawrence Anthes	Patrolman	Separated while IA pending	^[26]
2025	Lawrence Anthes	Patrolman	Separated while IA pending	^[27]
2025	Lawrence Anthes	Patrolman	Separated while IA pending	^[28]
2024	Lawrence Anthes	Officer	Suspended 10 days	^[29]
2024	Shane Carle	Officer	TerminatedSeparated while IA pending	^[30]
2024	Shane Carle	Officer	TerminatedSeparated while IA pending	^[31]
2024	Stephen Hars	Officer	Terminated	^[32]
2024	Stephen Hars	Officer	TerminatedSuspended 0 days	^[33]
2023	Shane Carle	Officer	Suspended 28 days	^[34]
2023	Lawrence Anthes	Officer	DemotedSuspended 30 days	^[35]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

One record in the Fatal Encounters dataset names Clinton Township Police Department, from 2000. The as-recorded force label on that record is Gunshot. Fatal Encounters was an independent, crowdsourced journalism project that documented deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, medical emergencies, and suicides in police presence. A record is not a finding of fault, and it does not say police caused the death. The project stopped collecting in December 2021, so the dataset stops there.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.^[3] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Clinton Township Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

Douglas E. Campbell
November 7, 2000 · Lebanon · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.^[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Clinton Township, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 22 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 58 filed to Clinton Township are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

22^{^[4]}

Identified by subject line, of 80 filed to Clinton Township

Most recent request

July 2026^{^[4]}

First recorded July 2018

Awaiting a response

13^{^[4]}

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Clinton Township (requests)
Awaiting agency response	13
Request refused	4
Agency said records not held	2
Requester reported success	2
Under internal review	1

figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-plot] { aspect-ratio: auto !important; } figure[data-chart-ready] [data-chart-table] { position: static !important; overflow: visible !important; }

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Clinton Township, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

2026-07-10Awaiting agency response
2026-03-05Awaiting agency response
2025-08-22Awaiting agency response
2025-08-10Request refused
2025-06-05Agency said records not held
2024-11-28Awaiting agency response
2024-11-26Awaiting agency response
2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
2023-07-26Awaiting agency response
2022-11-22Requester reported success
2022-08-14Agency said records not held

Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

A member of the public requested: “Police Report”
2026-07-10 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “K9 Activity Reports for 2023 & 2024”
2026-03-05 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Police Policies”
2025-08-22 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “2023 & 2024 K9 Activity Reports”
2025-08-10 · Request refused
A member of the public requested: “Cad and police report”
2025-06-05 · Agency said records not held
A member of the public requested: “Arrest reports of incident case #2023024578”
2024-11-28 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Clinton Police Department Open Records Request”
2024-11-26 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Purchase order history for the police department from 2020 - 2023”
2023-08-31 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Invoice of Body Camera Purchase in the Police Department”
2023-08-31 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Records related to donations to the police department k9 unit”
2023-07-26 · Awaiting agency response
A member of the public requested: “Police Badge numbers”
2022-11-22 · Requester reported success
A member of the public requested: “Job Detailed officers”
2022-08-14 · Agency said records not held

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Clinton Township on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Clinton Township are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Clinton Township Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Clinton Township Police Department, a municipal police agency in Hunterdon County, recorded 29 internal affairs investigations in 2025 and named 14 officers in those cases. The rate of 207.1 per 100 officers ran far above the Hunterdon County median of 129.3 and the 125.9 municipal median statewide. A rate that high can indicate more misconduct or a department documenting a much larger share of its complaints than its peers do. Of the 29 investigations detailed for 2025, 10 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor and Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency led the allegation categories, followed by Neglect of Duty. Clinton Twp accounts for 12 major discipline records across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025, including 4 terminations. It received an F on the report card, at the 99th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Clinton Township Police Department report in 2025?

Clinton Township Police Department reported 29 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 14 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Clinton Township Police Department have?

Clinton Township Police Department has 12 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 4 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Clinton Township Police Department have?

Clinton Township Police Department reported 27 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 11.1% of them female. That is 2.02 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Clinton Township Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 1 record naming Clinton Township Police Department, from 2000 through 2000. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Clinton Township Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 24 active Clinton Township Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $128,294. The median for the 151 TPAF-enrolled staff at CLINTON TWP BD OF ED is $82,120, a ratio of 1.56x. Against the Hunterdon County school-staff median the ratio is 1.55x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

[1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2272. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
[3]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
[4]Records-request activity for Clinton Township. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
[5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Clinton Twp PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
[7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8355. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
[8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8355. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
[9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8355. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
[10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8355. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
[11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 240. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1257. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1764. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 748. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2272. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
[16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Clinton Twp PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
[17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Clinton Twp PD row for 2021. ↩
[18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Clinton Twp PD row for 2022. ↩
[19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Clinton Twp PD row for 2023. ↩
[20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Clinton Twp PD row for 2024. ↩
[21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Clinton Twp PD row for 2025. ↩
[22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8355. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
[23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
[24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 411. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 412. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 413. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[27]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 414. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[28]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 415. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[29]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1139. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[30]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1140. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[31]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1141. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[32]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1142. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[33]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1143. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[34]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1748. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[35]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1749. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩