Skip to content

Department profile · Mercer County

Lawrence Township Police Department

Reported as: Lawrence Twp PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Lawrence Township on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Lawrence Township Police Department, the municipal police agency in Mercer County, reported 47 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 32 officers named in those cases. The rate of 146.9 per 100 officers exceeds the Mercer County median of 133.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. That can be a sign of more misconduct or of a department with a fuller complaint record than its peers. Of the 47 investigations detailed for 2025, 19 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, with Other Departmental Rule Violation and Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation following.

Four major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025, including two terminations. Lawrence Twp PD received a D on the report card, at the 76th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

32[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

47[1]

Incidents, 2025

39[1]

Major discipline records

4

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

61[5]

63 years reported

61 sworn officers in 2025, up from 24 in 1962 (+154%).
Yearsworn officers
196224
196323
196424
196526
196629
1967not reported
19681
196934
197036
197137
197239
197338
197440
197541
197641
197746
197850
197952
198048
198150
198250
198350
198450
198554
198654
198754
198856
198959
199061
199160
199255
199354
199457
199561
199664
199767
199867
199966
200069
200170
200270
200370
200470
200570
200669
200769
200868
200969
201067
201164
201258
201356
201460
201559
201658
201758
201858
201958
202060
202160
202260
202360
202460
202561

Civilian employees, 2025

15[6]

0.25 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

6[7]

9.8% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

1.9[8]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Lawrence Township Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92)

840–2005200–4001400–6001600–800800–100011000–1200

Lawrence Township Police Department: 61 sworn officers: 3rd percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92).

Lawrence Township Police Department: 61 sworn officers, the 3rd percentile among 92 Municipal police, 60+ officers.
Sworn officers: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–20084
200–4005
400–6001
600–8001
800–10000
1000–12001

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 56 active Lawrence Township Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$88,041[2]

56 active officers

Median school staff

$87,683

Mercer County, all TPAF members

Against the county

1.00x

Median officer to Mercer County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Mercer County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.

Internal affairs investigations by year

312021412022522023452024472025
Internal affairs investigations reported by Lawrence Township Police Department, by year
Internal affairs investigations reported by Lawrence Township Police Department, by year
20212022202320242025
3141524547

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 47 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Lawrence Township Police Department, 2025
Most serious allegations reported by Lawrence Township Police Department, 2025
Demeanor16
Other Departmental Rule Violation9
Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation6
Preventable MV Accident4
Differential Treatment3
Other Criminal Violation2
Improper Entry2
BWC/MVR Violation1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Lawrence Township Police Department, 2025
Internal dispositions reported by Lawrence Township Police Department, 2025
Sustained19
Exonerated15
not provided8
Unfounded4
Not Sustained1
LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT146.9COUNTY MEDIAN, MUNICIPAL POLICE (13)133.3NJ MEDIAN, MUNICIPAL POLICE (445)125.9
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Lawrence Township Police Department146.9
County median, municipal police (13)133.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

47 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 61 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[15] = 77.0 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade D: Second-highest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
76th percentile of 93 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Lawrence Township Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

660–502550–1001100–1501150–200

Lawrence Township Police Department: 39.474 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 61st percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

Lawrence Township Police Department: 39.474 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers, the 61st percentile among 93 Municipal police, 60+ officers.
Discipline severity: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–5066
50–10025
100–1501
150–2001

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

72nd percentileof 93 peers

142.3 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

61st percentileof 93 peers

39.5 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

44th percentileof 93 peers

1.98 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20220
20232
20241
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Lawrence Township Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Hector NievesPatrolmanTerminated[16]
2024Shareef HardinPolice OfficerSuspended 6 days[17]
2023Timothy WallaceOfficerTerminatedSuspended 84 days[18]
2023Joseph ClossonOfficerSeparated while IA pending[19]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[3] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Lawrence Township (Mercer), the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 44 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 255 filed to Lawrence Township (Mercer) are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

44[3]

Identified by subject line, of 299 filed to Lawrence Township (Mercer)

Most recent request

December 2025[3]

First recorded November 2017

Awaiting a response

15[3]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Lawrence Township (Mercer) (requests)
Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Lawrence Township (Mercer)
Requester reported success21
Awaiting agency response15
Requester reported partial success4
Request refused2
Agency said records not held1
Withdrawn by requester1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Lawrence Township (Mercer), by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-12-30Requester reported success
  2. 2025-09-16Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-09-09Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-05-09Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-04-28Awaiting agency response
  6. 2025-02-13Requester reported success
  7. 2024-11-28Awaiting agency response
  8. 2024-08-27Requester reported success
  9. 2024-08-05Request refused
  10. 2024-08-05Requester reported success
  11. 2024-07-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2024-06-18Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Lawrence Township (Mercer) on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Lawrence Township (Mercer) are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Lawrence Township Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Lawrence Township Police Department, the municipal police agency in Mercer County, reported 47 internal affairs investigations in 2025 involving 32 officers named in those cases. The rate of 146.9 per 100 officers exceeds the Mercer County median of 133.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. That can be a sign of more misconduct or of a department with a fuller complaint record than its peers. Of the 47 investigations detailed for 2025, 19 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, with Other Departmental Rule Violation and Vehicular Pursuit Policy Violation following. Four major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025, including two terminations. Lawrence Twp PD received a D on the report card, at the 76th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Lawrence Township Police Department report in 2025?

Lawrence Township Police Department reported 47 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 32 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Lawrence Township Police Department have?

Lawrence Township Police Department has 4 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 2 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Lawrence Township Police Department have?

Lawrence Township Police Department reported 61 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 9.8% of them female. That is 1.9 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What does Lawrence Township Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 56 active Lawrence Township Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $88,041. Against the Mercer County school-staff median the ratio is 1.00x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2293. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09.
  2. [2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json.
  3. [3]Records-request activity for Lawrence Township (Mercer). OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity.
  4. [4]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  5. [5]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8376. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/.
  6. [6]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8376. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8376. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/.
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8376. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/.
  9. [9]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 261. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09.
  10. [10]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1278. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09.
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1781. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09.
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 765. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09.
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2293. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09.
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Lawrence Twp PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header.
  15. [15]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8376. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/.
  16. [16]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 418. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03.
  17. [17]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1145. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03.
  18. [18]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1753. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03.
  19. [19]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1754. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03.