Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Warren County

Washington Township Police Department

Reported as: Washington Twp PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Seven internal affairs investigations were reported by Washington Township Police Department in Warren County for 2025, with seven officers named. The rate of 100 per 100 officers sat under the Warren County median of 128.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. One of the seven investigations detailed for 2025 reported a sustained complaint. Harassment/Stalking was the leading allegation category, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation and Sexual Assault/Criminal Sexual Violation. Allegations are not findings.

One major discipline record appears across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2022, and a termination is not reported in it. Washington Twp PD received a B on the report card, at the 37th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

7[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

7[1]

Incidents, 2025

4[1]

Major discipline records

1

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

27[8]

50 years reported

27 sworn officers in 2025, up from 2 in 1976 (+1250%).
Yearsworn officers
19762
19774
19785
19795
19805
19815
19825
198318
19846
19856
19867
19879
198810
198910
199010
199110
199210
199310
199410
199510
199610
199710
199811
199911
200011
200111
200212
200313
200413
200513
200613
200713
200813
200924
201028
201128
201226
201329
201426
201527
201627
201726
201827
201926
202028
202128
202228
202326
202427
202527

Civilian employees, 2025

1[9]

0.04 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

1[10]

3.7% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

3.83[11]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Washington Township Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
14–1617
16–1820
18–2027
20–2217
22–2426
24–2624
26–2816
28–3019

Washington Township Police Department: 27 sworn officers: 86th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 26 active Washington Township Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$126,539[3]

26 active officers

Median local school staff

$71,126

WASHINGTON BORO BD OF ED, 68 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.78x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.56x

Median officer to Warren County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "WASHINGTON BORO BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Warren County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Washington Township Police Department in Warren County received two recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the federal military surplus program, transfers dated between 2013 and 2017, both under Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Their recorded value totals $257,583 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value, all of it in a category this site classes as tactical. These are transfers received, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$257,583[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$257,583[2]

2 of 2 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2013-2017[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 2 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Washington Township Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled257,583 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Washington Township Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Trucks and truck tractors, wheeledMilitary trucks · FSC 2320Tactical22 items (Each)$257,583

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Washington Township Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
TRUCK,UTILITYNSN 2320-01-413-3739Shipped 2017-04-24 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$192,513
TRUCK,ARMOREDNSN 2320-01-074-7642Shipped 2013-03-21 · DEMIL CTrucks and truck tractors, wheeled Tactical1 Each$65,070

2 of 2 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Washington Township Police Department received $9,540 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 96th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (15-29 officers, n=167).

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000148
5000–1000012
10000–150004
15000–200001
20000–250000
25000–300001

Washington Township Police Department: 9,540 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 96th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20219
202210
202317
20248
20257

Incidents

4 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20219
20225
20238
20244
20254

Officers on IA rows

7 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20248
20257
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
20220
20230
202412.5
202514.286

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 7 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, 2025
Harassment/Stalking4
Other Departmental Rule Violation1
Sexual Assault/Criminal Sexual Violation1
Demeanor1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Harassment/Stalking · Other Departmental Rule Violation · Sexual Assault/Criminal Sexual Violation · Demeanor

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Washington Township Police Department, 2025
Unfounded6
Sustained1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

20 of 51

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20225
20235
20247
20251

Other Criminal Violation

6 of 51

Other Criminal Violation allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20222
20232
20240
20250

Demeanor

5 of 51

Demeanor allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20220
20231
20240
20251

Differential Treatment

5 of 51

Differential Treatment allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20222
20233
20240
20250

Other (5 categories)

15 of 51

Other (5 categories) allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20221
20236
20241
20255

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Washington Township Police Department100.0
County median, municipal police (8)128.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

7 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 27 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[23] = 25.9 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade B: Second-lowest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
37th percentile of 171 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Washington Township Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–50120
50–10024
100–15015
150–2007
200–2503
250–3002

Washington Township Police Department: 20.833 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 53rd percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

15th percentileof 171 peers

104.9 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

53rd percentileof 171 peers

20.8 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

70th percentileof 171 peers

2.31 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[24] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025100.0322nd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20257267th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20254303rd of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20251184th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$9,54029th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year3.8367th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.56x110th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present14303rd of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

0 major discipline records in 2025, holding roughly steady.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20221
20230
20240
20250

0 major discipline records in 2025, holding roughly steady.

Major discipline records reported by Washington Township Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2022Christopher TremelOfficerSuspended 90 days[25]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

Two records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Washington Township Police Department, spanning 2003 through 2017. The force labels, as recorded by the project, are Gunshot in two of them. Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced journalism project that documented deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, deaths in police presence, and medical emergencies. A record is not a finding of fault against the agency or any officer, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records elsewhere on this page. The project stopped collecting in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen and nothing after that date appears here.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[4] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Washington Township Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

  • James "Jim" August Appis

    July 18, 2017 · Hackettstown · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

  • Justin McCarthy

    May 30, 2003 · Washington Township · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[5] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Washington Township (Warren), the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 14 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 31 filed to Washington Township (Warren) are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

14[5]

Identified by subject line, of 45 filed to Washington Township (Warren)

Most recent request

September 2025[5]

First recorded November 2017

Awaiting a response

9[5]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Washington Township (Warren) (requests)
Awaiting agency response9
Requester reported success3
Requester reported partial success1
Withdrawn by requester1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Washington Township (Warren), by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-09-10Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-06-16Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-02-19Awaiting agency response
  4. 2024-05-09Requester reported success
  5. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  6. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  7. 2021-04-20Requester reported success
  8. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  9. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  10. 2020-05-27Awaiting agency response
  11. 2020-05-27Requester reported partial success
  12. 2020-05-27Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Washington Township (Warren) on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Washington Township (Warren) are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Washington Township Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Seven internal affairs investigations were reported by Washington Township Police Department in Warren County for 2025, with seven officers named. The rate of 100 per 100 officers sat under the Warren County median of 128.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. One of the seven investigations detailed for 2025 reported a sustained complaint. Harassment/Stalking was the leading allegation category, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation and Sexual Assault/Criminal Sexual Violation. Allegations are not findings. One major discipline record appears across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2022, and a termination is not reported in it. Washington Twp PD received a B on the report card, at the 37th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Washington Township Police Department report in 2025?

Washington Township Police Department reported 7 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 7 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Washington Township Police Department have?

Washington Township Police Department has 1 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Washington Township Police Department have?

Washington Township Police Department reported 27 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 3.7% of them female. That is 3.83 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Washington Township Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Washington Township Police Department received 2 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2013 and 2017, with a total recorded value of $257,583 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Trucks and truck tractors, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Washington Township Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Washington Township Police Department under the 1033 program totals $257,583 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $257,583 is in categories this site classes as tactical (2 of 2 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Washington Township Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 2 records naming Washington Township Police Department, from 2003 through 2017. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Washington Township Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 26 active Washington Township Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $126,539. The median for the 68 TPAF-enrolled staff at WASHINGTON BORO BD OF ED is $71,126, a ratio of 1.78x. Against the Warren County school-staff median the ratio is 1.56x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2556. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  5. [5]Records-request activity for Washington Township (Warren). OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Washington Twp PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  7. [7]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8638. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8638. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8638. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8638. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 509. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1531. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2037. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1017. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2556. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2021. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2022. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2023. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2024. ↩
  22. [22]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2025. ↩
  23. [23]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8638. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  24. [24]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2402. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩