Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Bergen County

Washington Township Police Department

Reported as: Washington Twp PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Not a civil service jurisdiction

This department is not among the NJCSC Appendix A jurisdictions, so major discipline here follows a different statutory track (generally N.J.S.A. 40A:14 for municipal police), with appeals that usually go to the Superior Court rather than the Civil Service Commission.

See the context on non-civil-service departments.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Washington Township Police Department in Bergen County reported two internal affairs investigations in 2025, with two officers named. That is a rate of 100 per 100 officers, below the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. Sustained complaints were not reported among the two investigations detailed for 2025. The allegation categories logged were Improper Arrest and Other Departmental Rule Violation.

No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Washington Twp PD received an A on the report card, at the 10th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

2[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

2[1]

Incidents, 2025

2[1]

Major discipline records

0

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

26[8]

64 years reported

26 sworn officers in 2025, up from 9 in 1962 (+189%).
Yearsworn officers
19629
19639
196411
196512
196612
196714
196813
196916
197017
197119
197217
197319
197419
197520
197620
197719
197819
197918
198020
198120
198220
198320
198419
198519
198620
198719
198820
198920
199021
199121
199221
199321
199422
199522
199622
199723
199824
199922
200023
200123
200225
200324
200424
200524
200624
200722
200822
200922
201021
201121
201220
201319
201420
201520
201620
201720
201819
201920
202021
202121
202224
202326
202426
202526

Civilian employees, 2025

5[9]

0.19 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

1[10]

3.8% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.75[11]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Washington Township Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
14–1617
16–1820
18–2027
20–2217
22–2426
24–2624
26–2816
28–3019

Washington Township Police Department: 26 sworn officers: 81st percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=166).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 22 active Washington Township Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$146,269[3]

22 active officers

Median school staff

$91,650

Bergen County, all TPAF members

Against the county

1.60x

Median officer to Bergen County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Bergen County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Washington Township Police Department in Bergen County received five recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the federal military surplus program between 2018 and 2019, all in categories this site classes as tactical. Their recorded value totals $15,755 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. Tactical sets, kits, and outfits accounted for $12,719, with Optical sighting and ranging equipment at $1,638 and Guns, through 30mm at $1,398. These are transfers received, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$15,755[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$15,755[2]

5 of 5 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2018-2019[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 76 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Washington Township Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Tactical sets, kits, and outfits12,719 tactical
Optical sighting and ranging equipment1,638 tactical
Guns, through 30mm1,398 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Washington Township Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Tactical sets, kits, and outfitsWeapons · FSC 1367Tactical11 items (Each)$12,719
Optical sighting and ranging equipmentWeapon optics and sights · FSC 1240Tactical25 items (Each)$1,638
Guns, through 30mmWeapons · FSC 1005Tactical270 items (Each)$1,398

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Washington Township Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
CAPABILITIES SET,NON-LETHALNSN 1367-01-561-4003Shipped 2019-10-17 · DEMIL DTactical sets, kits, and outfits Tactical1 Each$12,719
MAGAZINE,CARTRIDGENSN 1005-01-520-5992Shipped 2019-03-06 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical10 Each$428
MAGAZINE,CARTRIDGENSN 1005-01-561-7200Shipped 2018-05-01 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical60 Each$970
BINOCULARNSN 1240-00-930-3833Shipped 2018-04-11 · DEMIL DOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical1 Each$278
SIGHT,REFLEXNSN 1240-01-540-3690Shipped 2018-04-11 · DEMIL QOptical sighting and ranging equipment Tactical4 Each$1,360

5 of 5 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Washington Township Police Department received $606 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 77th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (15-29 officers, n=167).

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000147
5000–1000013
10000–150004
15000–200001
20000–250000
25000–300001

Washington Township Police Department: 606 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 77th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=167).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20212
20229
20232
20242
20252

Incidents

2 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20227
20232
20242
20252

Officers on IA rows

2 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20242
20252
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202222.222
20230
20240
20250

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 2 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, 2025
Improper Arrest1
Other Departmental Rule Violation1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Improper Arrest · Other Departmental Rule Violation

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Washington Township Police Department, 2025
not provided1
Unfounded1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

5 of 17

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20222
20230
20241
20251

Improper Arrest

2 of 17

Improper Arrest allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20230
20241
20251

Neglect of duty

2 of 17

Neglect of duty allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20222
20230
20240
20250

not provided

2 of 17

not provided allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20222
20230
20240
20250

Other (5 categories)

6 of 17

Other (5 categories) allegations reported by Washington Township Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20223
20232
20240
20250

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Washington Township Police Department100.0
County median, municipal police (60)125.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

2 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 26 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[23] = 7.7 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade A: Lowest fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
10th percentile of 171 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Washington Township Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–50120
50–10024
100–15015
150–2007
200–2503
250–3002

Washington Township Police Department: 0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 25th percentile among Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=171).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

10th percentileof 171 peers

102.5 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

25th percentileof 171 peers

0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

59th percentileof 171 peers

2.13 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[24] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025100.0322nd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20252376th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20252364th of 445 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$606114th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.75152nd of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.60x87th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present15279th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

No major discipline records appear for this agency in the 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; see the methodology for what this data does and does not cover.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

Three records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Washington Township Police Department, spanning 2011 through 2015. The force labels, as recorded by the project, are Vehicle in two, and Gunshot in one. Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced journalism project that documented deaths occurring during police encounters of any kind, including vehicle pursuits, deaths in police presence, and medical emergencies. A record is not a finding of fault against the agency or any officer, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records elsewhere on this page. The project stopped collecting in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen and nothing after that date appears here.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[4] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Washington Township Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

  • Nuwnah Laroche

    May 6, 2015 · Secaucus · Highest level of force as recorded: Vehicle

  • Jason Champion

    May 6, 2015 · Secaucus · Highest level of force as recorded: Vehicle

  • Robert Ellis

    March 12, 2011 · Township of Washington · Highest level of force as recorded: Gunshot

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[5] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Washington Township (Bergen), the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 15 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 90 filed to Washington Township (Bergen) are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

15[5]

Identified by subject line, of 105 filed to Washington Township (Bergen)

Most recent request

October 2025[5]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

13[5]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Washington Township (Bergen) (requests)
Awaiting agency response13
Requester reported success2

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Washington Township (Bergen), by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-10-05Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-09-13Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-08-18Requester reported success
  4. 2024-05-09Awaiting agency response
  5. 2024-04-20Awaiting agency response
  6. 2023-11-28Awaiting agency response
  7. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  8. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  9. 2023-01-09Awaiting agency response
  10. 2021-04-20Requester reported success
  11. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  12. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Washington Township (Bergen) on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Washington Township (Bergen) are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Washington Township Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Washington Township Police Department in Bergen County reported two internal affairs investigations in 2025, with two officers named. That is a rate of 100 per 100 officers, below the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. Sustained complaints were not reported among the two investigations detailed for 2025. The allegation categories logged were Improper Arrest and Other Departmental Rule Violation. No major discipline records appear in the 2020-2025 releases, and the absence of records is not a finding. Washington Twp PD received an A on the report card, at the 10th percentile among 171 peers in the 15-29 officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Washington Township Police Department report in 2025?

Washington Township Police Department reported 2 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 2 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Washington Township Police Department have?

No major discipline records appear for Washington Township Police Department in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases. Absence of records is not a finding; discipline is listed only after all appeals conclude.

How many officers does Washington Township Police Department have?

Washington Township Police Department reported 26 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 3.8% of them female. That is 2.75 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Washington Township Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Washington Township Police Department received 5 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2018 and 2019, with a total recorded value of $15,755 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Tactical sets, kits, and outfits. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Washington Township Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Washington Township Police Department under the 1033 program totals $15,755 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $15,755 is in categories this site classes as tactical (5 of 5 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Washington Township Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 3 records naming Washington Township Police Department, from 2011 through 2015. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Washington Township Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 22 active Washington Township Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $146,269. Against the Bergen County school-staff median the ratio is 1.60x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2116. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  5. [5]Records-request activity for Washington Township (Bergen). OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Washington Twp PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  7. [7]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8194. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8194. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8194. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8194. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 83. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1100. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1612. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 592. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2116. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2021. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2022. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2023. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2024. ↩
  22. [22]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Washington Twp PD row for 2025. ↩
  23. [23]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8194. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  24. [24]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩