Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Bergen County

Lodi Police Department

Reported as: Lodi PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Lodi Borough on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Lodi Police Department logged 27 internal affairs investigations in 2025, with 17 officers named in those cases. The Bergen County municipal agency posted a rate of 158.8 per 100 officers, above the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. That spread can point to a heavier volume of misconduct or to a department that keeps a fuller record of complaints. Of the 27 investigations detailed for 2025, 14 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor led the allegation categories, with Other Departmental Rule Violation and Preventable MV Accident next.

Three major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2022, 2024 and 2025, including one termination. Lodi received a D on the report card, at the 62nd percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

17[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

27[1]

Incidents, 2025

25[1]

Major discipline records

3

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

57[7]

64 years reported

57 sworn officers in 2025, up from 34 in 1960 (+68%).
Yearsworn officers
196034
196132
1962not reported
196336
196434
196538
196637
196737
1968not reported
196945
197043
197146
197246
197346
197445
197545
197643
197742
197843
197946
198042
198134
198236
198337
198443
198544
198642
198744
198842
198942
199048
199141
199243
199341
199446
199534
199632
199732
199832
199936
200035
200137
200239
200341
200442
200542
200640
200743
200842
200941
201040
201139
201240
201341
201438
201544
201644
201745
201846
201947
202047
202147
202248
202355
202451
202557

Civilian employees, 2025

0[8]

0 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

5[9]

8.8% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.16[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Lodi Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
30–3538
35–4027
40–4516
45–5014
50–5510
55–606

Lodi Police Department: 57 sworn officers: 97th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=111).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 53 active Lodi Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$161,367[3]

53 active officers

Median local school staff

$77,486

LODI BD OF ED, 314 TPAF members

Against the local district

2.08x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.76x

Median officer to Bergen County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "LODI BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Bergen County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Lodi Police Department received two recorded line items through the federal surplus program, shipped between 2016 and 2017. Their recorded value is $2,616 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value, and none of it falls into the categories this site classes as tactical: the entries are ADPE system configuration at $2,485 and ADP supplies at $130. These are transfers the department received, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$2,616[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$0[2]

0 of 2 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2016-2017[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 3 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Lodi Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
ADPE system configuration2,485 mundane
ADP supplies130 mundane

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Lodi Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
ADPE system configurationComputers and office · FSC 7010Mundane12 items (Each)$2,485
ADP suppliesComputers and office · FSC 7045Mundane11 items (Each)$130

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Lodi Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
CASE,COMPUTERNSN 7045-01-557-4591Shipped 2017-12-11 · DEMIL QADP supplies Mundane1 Each$130
COMPUTER SYSTEM,DIGITALNSN 7010-01-601-7577Shipped 2016-09-23 · DEMIL DADPE system configuration Mundane2 Each$2,485

2 of 2 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Lodi Police Department received $0 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 33rd percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (30-59 officers, n=112).

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5000102
5000–100004
10000–150001
15000–200003
20000–250001

Lodi Police Department: 0 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 33rd percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=112).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Lodi Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
202126
20227
202348
202419
202527

Incidents

25 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202126
20227
202339
202417
202525

Officers on IA rows

25 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202418
202525
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202228.571
202337.5
202442.105
202551.852

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 25 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Lodi Police Department, 2025
Demeanor11
Other Departmental Rule Violation6
Preventable MV Accident5
Insubordination/Disobeying An Order2
Neglect of Duty2
Differential Treatment1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Demeanor · Other Departmental Rule Violation · Preventable MV Accident · Insubordination/Disobeying An Order · Neglect of Duty · Differential Treatment

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Lodi Police Department, 2025
Sustained14
Unfounded6
Not Sustained3
Exonerated2
Administratively Closed2

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

56 of 127

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202114
20223
202327
20246
20256

Demeanor

47 of 127

Demeanor allegations reported by Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202112
20223
202315
20246
202511

Preventable MV Accident

12 of 127

Preventable MV Accident allegations reported by Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20233
20244
20255

Insubordination/Disobeying An Order

3 of 127

Insubordination/Disobeying An Order allegations reported by Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20230
20240
20252

Other (6 categories)

9 of 127

Other (6 categories) allegations reported by Lodi Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20233
20243
20253

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Lodi Police Department158.8
County median, municipal police (60)125.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

27 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 57 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 47.4 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade D: Second-highest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
62nd percentile of 110 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Lodi Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–5073
50–10025
100–1504
150–2006
200–2501
250–3001

Lodi Police Department: 51.136 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 68th percentile among Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=110).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

73rd percentileof 110 peers

135.8 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

68th percentileof 110 peers

51.1 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

1st percentileof 110 peers

1.49 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025158.885th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20252786th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20252574th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-2025387th of 282 municipal police
Terminations2020-2025130th of 111 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$0152nd of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.16277th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.76x30th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present15279th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20221
20230
20241
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Lodi Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Miguel PerezOfficerSuspended 30 days[24]
2024Ankaury CamiloRecruitTerminated[25]
2022Theresa GrilloCaptainDemotedSuspended 60 days[26]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Lodi Borough, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 15 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 98 filed to Lodi Borough are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

15[4]

Identified by subject line, of 113 filed to Lodi Borough

Most recent request

May 2026[4]

First recorded October 2018

Awaiting a response

11[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Lodi Borough (requests)
Awaiting agency response11
Requester reported success2
Requester reported partial success2

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Lodi Borough, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-05-14Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-10-05Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-09-13Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-08-07Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-05-16Awaiting agency response
  6. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  7. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  8. 2021-04-20Requester reported success
  9. 2021-03-03Requester reported success
  10. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  11. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
  12. 2020-05-28Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Lodi Borough on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Lodi Borough are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Lodi Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Lodi Police Department logged 27 internal affairs investigations in 2025, with 17 officers named in those cases. The Bergen County municipal agency posted a rate of 158.8 per 100 officers, above the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the 125.9 statewide municipal median. That spread can point to a heavier volume of misconduct or to a department that keeps a fuller record of complaints. Of the 27 investigations detailed for 2025, 14 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor led the allegation categories, with Other Departmental Rule Violation and Preventable MV Accident next. Three major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2022, 2024 and 2025, including one termination. Lodi received a D on the report card, at the 62nd percentile among 110 peers in the 30-59 officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Lodi Police Department report in 2025?

Lodi Police Department reported 27 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 17 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Lodi Police Department have?

Lodi Police Department has 3 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 1 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Lodi Police Department have?

Lodi Police Department reported 57 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 8.8% of them female. That is 2.16 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Lodi Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Lodi Police Department received 2 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2016 and 2017, with a total recorded value of $2,616 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: ADPE system configuration. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Lodi Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Lodi Police Department under the 1033 program totals $2,616 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $0 is in categories this site classes as tactical (0 of 2 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Lodi Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 53 active Lodi Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $161,367. The median for the 314 TPAF-enrolled staff at LODI BD OF ED is $77,486, a ratio of 2.08x. Against the Bergen County school-staff median the ratio is 1.76x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2085. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Lodi Borough. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Lodi PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8160. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8160. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8160. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8160. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 52. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1068. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1579. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 559. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2085. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Lodi PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Lodi PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Lodi PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Lodi PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Lodi PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Lodi PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8160. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 78. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 881. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  26. [26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2056. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩