Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Union County

Rahway Police Department

Reported as: Rahway PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Rahway on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

Radio encryption

Rahway Police Department encrypts its radio communications (P25 AES-256, all operations), according to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, as of 2026-03-06 (unverified).

AnalysisThis site treats radio encryption as a meaningful transparency signal. When a department closes its radio traffic to the public, the public loses a real-time window into how it operates. That is context for reading the discipline and internal affairs records on this page, not a figure drawn from them.

In brief

Rahway Police Department reported 37 internal affairs investigations in 2025 with 27 officers named in those cases. Its rate of 137 per 100 officers matched the Union County median of 137 and ran above the 125.9 municipal median. A heavier internal affairs load can mean more misconduct or a department that records more of the complaints it fields. Of the 37 investigations detailed for 2025, 12 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation and Improper Arrest.

Four major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2021, 2022 and 2024. Rahway received a C on the report card, at the 50th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

27[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

37[1]

Incidents, 2025

25[1]

Major discipline records

4

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

83[7]

66 years reported

83 sworn officers in 2025, up from 53 in 1960 (+57%).
Yearsworn officers
196053
196157
196257
196358
196463
196563
196663
196761
196861
196962
197064
197165
197265
197371
197470
197571
197670
197771
197874
197974
198074
198173
198276
198372
198473
198574
198673
198773
198871
198973
199074
199173
199275
199376
199479
199577
199682
199782
199885
199987
200090
200189
200289
200380
200480
200581
200680
200780
200882
200976
201073
201174
201276
201373
201476
201574
201673
201773
201876
201976
202076
202181
202278
202383
202483
202583

Civilian employees, 2025

21[8]

0.25 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

10[9]

12% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.68[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Rahway Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–20084
200–4005
400–6001
600–8001
800–10000
1000–12001

Rahway Police Department: 83 sworn officers: 41st percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 78 active Rahway Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$83,425[3]

78 active officers

Median local school staff

$79,975

RAHWAY CITY BD OF ED, 414 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.04x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

0.93x

Median officer to Union County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "RAHWAY CITY BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Union County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Rahway Police Department received two recorded line items, shipped between 2016 and 2018 and recorded at $670,500 in original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value. Both fall in categories this site classes as tactical: Combat, assault, and tactical vehicles, wheeled at $658,000 and Guns, through 30mm at $12,500. Two transfers received in those years are not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the program is not misconduct, and this federal data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$670,500[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$670,500[2]

2 of 2 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

2016-2018[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 251 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Rahway Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Combat, assault, and tactical vehicles, wheeled658,000 tactical
Guns, through 30mm12,500 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Rahway Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Combat, assault, and tactical vehicles, wheeledArmored vehicles (MRAPs) · FSC 2355Tactical11 items (Each)$658,000
Guns, through 30mmWeapons · FSC 1005Tactical1250 items (Each)$12,500

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Rahway Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
WEAPON ACCESSORIESNSN 1005-DS-SWE-PASCShipped 2018-06-05 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical250 Each$12,500
MINE RESISTANT VEHICLENSN 2355-01-553-4634Shipped 2016-11-23 · DEMIL CCombat, assault, and tactical vehicles, wheeled Tactical1 Each$658,000

2 of 2 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Rahway Police Department received $8,078 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 88th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (60+ officers, n=93).

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–500076
5000–100008
10000–150006
15000–200002

Rahway Police Department: 8,078 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 88th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Rahway Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
202161
2022101
2023100
2024106
202537

Incidents

25 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202161
202281
202368
202482
202525

Officers on IA rows

37 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
2024103
202537
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202211.881
202312
202412.264
202532.432

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 37 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Rahway Police Department, 2025
Demeanor12
Other Departmental Rule Violation8
Improper Arrest4
Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency3
Preventable MV Accident3
Improper Search2
Neglect of Duty2
Insubordination/Disobeying An Order1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Demeanor · Other Departmental Rule Violation · Improper Arrest · Conduct Unbecoming/Discredit To The Agency · Preventable MV Accident · Improper Search · Neglect of Duty · Insubordination/Disobeying An Order

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Rahway Police Department, 2025
Exonerated14
Sustained13
Administratively Closed4
Not Sustained3
not provided2
Unfounded1

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

173 of 405

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202135
202243
202337
202450
20258

Demeanor

74 of 405

Demeanor allegations reported by Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20215
202212
202322
202423
202512

Excessive Force

47 of 405

Excessive Force allegations reported by Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20216
202216
202316
20249
20250

Improper Arrest

19 of 405

Improper Arrest allegations reported by Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20214
20227
20232
20242
20254

Other (18 categories)

92 of 405

Other (18 categories) allegations reported by Rahway Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202111
202223
202323
202422
202513

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Rahway Police Department137.0
County median, municipal police (23)137.0
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

37 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 83 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 44.6 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade C: Middle fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
50th percentile of 93 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Rahway Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–5066
50–10025
100–1501
150–2001

Rahway Police Department: 15.748 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 23rd percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

84th percentileof 93 peers

156.4 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

23rd percentileof 93 peers

15.7 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

39th percentileof 93 peers

1.95 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025137.0177th of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20253758th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20252574th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-2025458th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$8,07834th of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.68165th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-310.93x388th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present22156th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

0 major discipline records in 2025, holding roughly steady.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20212
20221
20230
20241
20250

0 major discipline records in 2025, holding roughly steady.

Major discipline records reported by Rahway Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2024Amber FontanellaSergeantSuspended 14 days[24]
2022Thomas KoszalkaPOSuspended 15 days[25]
2021Mark DeazevedoOfficerSuspended 7 days[26]
2021Amber FontanellaOfficerSuspended 10 days[27]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Rahway City, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 22 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 180 filed to Rahway City are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

22[4]

Identified by subject line, of 202 filed to Rahway City

Most recent request

September 2025[4]

First recorded April 2020

Awaiting a response

15[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Rahway City (requests)
Awaiting agency response15
Requester reported success5
Requester reported partial success1
Request refused1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Rahway City, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2025-09-15Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-08-16Requester reported partial success
  3. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-05-30Awaiting agency response
  5. 2024-09-28Awaiting agency response
  6. 2024-08-27Requester reported success
  7. 2024-08-16Awaiting agency response
  8. 2024-06-28Requester reported success
  9. 2024-04-20Request refused
  10. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  11. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2023-07-08Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Rahway City on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Rahway City are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Rahway Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Rahway Police Department reported 37 internal affairs investigations in 2025 with 27 officers named in those cases. Its rate of 137 per 100 officers matched the Union County median of 137 and ran above the 125.9 municipal median. A heavier internal affairs load can mean more misconduct or a department that records more of the complaints it fields. Of the 37 investigations detailed for 2025, 12 reported sustained complaints. Demeanor was the leading allegation category, followed by Other Departmental Rule Violation and Improper Arrest. Four major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2021, 2022 and 2024. Rahway received a C on the report card, at the 50th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Rahway Police Department report in 2025?

Rahway Police Department reported 37 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 27 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Rahway Police Department have?

Rahway Police Department has 4 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

Does Rahway Police Department encrypt its radio communications?

According to PoliceRadioEncryption.com, Rahway Police Department encrypts all of its radio communications (P25 AES-256), as recorded on 2026-03-06. This site treats radio encryption as a transparency signal, which is analysis, not a figure from the discipline data.

How many officers does Rahway Police Department have?

Rahway Police Department reported 83 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 12% of them female. That is 2.68 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Rahway Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Rahway Police Department received 2 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 2016 and 2018, with a total recorded value of $670,500 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Combat, assault, and tactical vehicles, wheeled. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Rahway Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Rahway Police Department under the 1033 program totals $670,500 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $670,500 is in categories this site classes as tactical (2 of 2 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Rahway Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 78 active Rahway Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $83,425. The median for the 414 TPAF-enrolled staff at RAHWAY CITY BD OF ED is $79,975, a ratio of 1.04x. Against the Union County school-staff median the ratio is 0.93x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2534. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Rahway City. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Rahway PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8613. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8613. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8613. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8613. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 487. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1510. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2017. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 995. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2534. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Rahway PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Rahway PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Rahway PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Rahway PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Rahway PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Rahway PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8613. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1447. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2397. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  26. [26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2777. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  27. [27]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2778. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩