Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Cumberland County

Vineland Police Department

Reported as: Vineland PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Vineland City on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Vineland Police Department logged 94 internal affairs investigations in 2025, its largest count in the series, involving 68 officers named in those cases. The rate of 138.2 per 100 officers ran under the Cumberland County median of 181.8 while sitting above the 125.9 statewide municipal median. Either comparison can be read as more misconduct or as a department that documents more of its complaints. Of the 94 investigations detailed for 2025, 50 reported sustained complaints, a far higher share than most agencies report. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, with Preventable MV Accident and Demeanor next.

Vineland accounts for 13 major discipline records across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2020, 2024 and 2025, including 3 terminations. Vineland received a D on the report card, at the 72nd percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

68[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

94[1]

Incidents, 2025

78[1]

Major discipline records

13

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

147[7]

66 years reported

147 sworn officers in 2025, up from 36 in 1960 (+308%).
Yearsworn officers
196036
196137
196243
196343
196449
196547
196649
196751
196857
196960
197065
197171
197274
197381
197486
197592
197693
197794
197896
1979103
1980103
198197
1982108
1983102
1984103
1985113
1986112
1987113
1988106
198999
1990109
1991109
1992110
1993120
1994123
1995122
1996126
1997129
1998128
1999137
2000139
2001136
2002134
2003139
2004149
2005145
2006149
2007155
2008155
2009157
2010153
2011142
2012145
2013139
2014150
2015130
2016132
2017121
2018145
2019146
2020120
2021147
2022141
2023147
2024148
2025147

Civilian employees, 2025

27[8]

0.18 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

18[9]

12.2% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.35[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Vineland Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–20084
200–4005
400–6001
600–8001
800–10000
1000–12001

Vineland Police Department: 147 sworn officers: 80th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 153 active Vineland Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$87,833[2]

153 active officers

Median local school staff

$81,152

VINELAND CITY BD OF ED, 914 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.08x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.12x

Median officer to Cumberland County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "VINELAND CITY BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Cumberland County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

No 1033 transfers recorded. No surplus-equipment transfers appear for this agency under a high-confidence name match in the Defense Logistics Agency's file as of 2026-06-30. That can mean the agency received nothing through the program, or that a recipient name in the federal file did not confidently match this department. See the methodology for how the match is made, or the statewide 1033 overview for how the program spreads across New Jersey.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Vineland Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
202176
202248
202355
202464
202594

Incidents

78 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202175
202243
202339
202455
202578

Officers on IA rows

94 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
202463
202594
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202254.167
202312.727
20240
202553.191

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 94 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Vineland Police Department, 2025
Other Departmental Rule Violation44
Preventable MV Accident18
Demeanor14
Excessive Force7
Improper Supervision/Failure To Supervise3
Domestic violence (Non-Criminal)3
Neglect of Duty2
Differential Treatment1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Other Departmental Rule Violation · Preventable MV Accident · Demeanor · Excessive Force · Improper Supervision/Failure To Supervise · Domestic violence (Non-Criminal) · Neglect of Duty · Differential Treatment

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Vineland Police Department, 2025
Sustained49
Exonerated26
Unfounded10
not provided7
Not Sustained2

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

157 of 337

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202166
202214
202325
20248
202544

Demeanor

37 of 337

Demeanor allegations reported by Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20226
20237
202410
202514

Preventable MV Accident

36 of 337

Preventable MV Accident allegations reported by Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
202212
20230
20246
202518

not provided

33 of 337

not provided allegations reported by Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20221
20233
202429
20250

Other (18 categories)

74 of 337

Other (18 categories) allegations reported by Vineland Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
202110
202215
202320
202411
202518

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Vineland Police Department138.2
County median, municipal police (3)181.8
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

94 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 147 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 63.9 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade D: Second-highest fifth

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
72nd percentile of 93 peers
Confidence
High confidence

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Vineland Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–5066
50–10025
100–1501
150–2001

Vineland Police Department: 64 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 85th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

55th percentileof 93 peers

134.3 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

85th percentileof 93 peers

64.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

13th percentileof 93 peers

1.67 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025138.2171st of 445 municipal police
IA investigations20259417th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents20257814th of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-20251313th of 282 municipal police
Terminations2020-2025310th of 111 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.35226th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.12x326th of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present3086th of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

9 major discipline records in 2025, up from 1 in 2020 (+800%).
Yearmajor discipline records
20201
20210
20220
20230
20243
20259

9 major discipline records in 2025, up from 1 in 2020 (+800%).

Major discipline records reported by Vineland Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Michael BenderOfficerSuspended 10 days[24]
2025Michael BenderOfiicerSuspended 5 days[25]
2025Michael BenderOfficerSuspended 15 days[26]
2025Pedro CasianoChiefSuspended 180 daysSeparated while IA pending[27]
2025Aaron LaneOfficerSeparated while IA pending[28]
2025Aaron LaneOfficerSeparated while IA pending[29]
2025Justin LevariSergeantSuspended 10 days[30]
2025Lukkas PerezOfficerSuspended 10 days[31]
2025Anthony TorresOfficerTerminated[32]
2024Michael FranskoOfficerTerminated[33]
2024Anthony TamburelliOfficerTerminated[34]
2024Emmory BowensOfficerSuspended 90 days[35]
2020Paul CifuentesOfficerSuspended 10 days[36]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Fatal encounters recorded involving this agency

From the independent Fatal Encounters dataset, 2000-2021

In brief (written by this site from the records below)

Seven records in the Fatal Encounters dataset name Vineland Police Department, in years from 2010 through 2021. The as-recorded level of force is listed as Gunshot in four of them, Drug overdose in two, and Vehicle in one. Fatal Encounters was an independent, crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind, including pursuits, medical emergencies, and overdoses. A record is not a finding of fault against Vineland Police Department or any officer. Collection ended in December 2021, so the dataset is frozen and later years are absent by design, not by inference.

Fatal Encounters is an independent, crowdsourced dataset that documented deaths during police encounters nationwide from 2000 until its collection ended in December 2021.[3] It records all deaths that occurred during a police encounter of any kind: vehicle pursuits, suicides in police presence, and medical emergencies are included alongside uses of force. A record appears here because Vineland Police Departmentis named in the record's as-reported agency field. A listing is not a misconduct finding, and it is not connected to the Attorney General discipline records above. See the methodology. Each record links to its own page with the full as-reported details.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Vineland City, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 30 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 138 filed to Vineland City are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

30[4]

Identified by subject line, of 168 filed to Vineland City

Most recent request

April 2026[4]

First recorded June 2018

Awaiting a response

21[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Vineland City (requests)
Awaiting agency response21
Requester reported success6
Requester reported partial success2
Response sent by post1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Vineland City, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-04-30Awaiting agency response
  2. 2025-12-30Requester reported success
  3. 2024-09-23Requester reported success
  4. 2024-09-05Awaiting agency response
  5. 2024-08-31Awaiting agency response
  6. 2024-08-29Awaiting agency response
  7. 2024-08-24Awaiting agency response
  8. 2024-08-23Awaiting agency response
  9. 2024-07-31Awaiting agency response
  10. 2024-05-31Awaiting agency response
  11. 2024-05-30Awaiting agency response
  12. 2024-05-11Awaiting agency response
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Vineland City on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Vineland City are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Vineland Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Vineland Police Department logged 94 internal affairs investigations in 2025, its largest count in the series, involving 68 officers named in those cases. The rate of 138.2 per 100 officers ran under the Cumberland County median of 181.8 while sitting above the 125.9 statewide municipal median. Either comparison can be read as more misconduct or as a department that documents more of its complaints. Of the 94 investigations detailed for 2025, 50 reported sustained complaints, a far higher share than most agencies report. Other Departmental Rule Violation led the allegation categories, with Preventable MV Accident and Demeanor next. Vineland accounts for 13 major discipline records across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2020, 2024 and 2025, including 3 terminations. Vineland received a D on the report card, at the 72nd percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a high-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Vineland Police Department report in 2025?

Vineland Police Department reported 94 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 68 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Vineland Police Department have?

Vineland Police Department has 13 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 3 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Vineland Police Department have?

Vineland Police Department reported 147 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 12.2% of them female. That is 2.35 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

How many deaths during police encounters are recorded for Vineland Police Department?

The independent Fatal Encounters dataset contains 7 records naming Vineland Police Department, from 2010 through 2021. Fatal Encounters is a crowdsourced journalism project, not a government source, and it documented deaths that occurred during police encounters of any kind. Each record links to a page showing it exactly as the project recorded it.

What does Vineland Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 153 active Vineland Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $87,833. The median for the 914 TPAF-enrolled staff at VINELAND CITY BD OF ED is $81,152, a ratio of 1.08x. Against the Cumberland County school-staff median the ratio is 1.12x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2208. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  3. [3]Fatal Encounters, New Jersey subset. Fatal Encounters (fatalencounters.org). Fatal Encounters national dataset (2000-2021); collection ended December 2021. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://fatalencounters.org/ ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Vineland City. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Vineland PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8283. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8283. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8283. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8283. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 178. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1194. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1703. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 684. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2208. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Vineland PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Vineland PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Vineland PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Vineland PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Vineland PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Vineland PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8283. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 273. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 274. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  26. [26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 275. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  27. [27]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 276. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  28. [28]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 277. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  29. [29]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 278. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  30. [30]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 279. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  31. [31]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 280. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  32. [32]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 281. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  33. [33]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1048. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  34. [34]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1049. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  35. [35]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1050. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  36. [36]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 2829. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩