Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJ
Menu

Department profile · Bergen County

Garfield Police Department

Reported as: Garfield PDMunicipal police

Jurisdiction context

Civil service jurisdiction

Discipline at this department is governed by the Title 4A civil service framework, matched to Garfield on the New Jersey Civil Service Commission roster.

Read how the process works or the Title 4A glossary. Browse NJCSNavigator’s civil service jurisdiction directory for the full local-jurisdiction roster.

Reflects the NJCSC Appendix A roster as of 2026-07-04. Context only, not legal advice.

In brief

Garfield Police Department is a municipal police agency in Bergen County. It named 16 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 19 investigations, a rate of 118.8 per 100 officers, below the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the statewide municipal median of 125.9. A lighter internal affairs docket can mean less misconduct or a narrower practice of recording complaints. Of the 19 investigations detailed for 2025, 3 reported sustained complaints. Excessive Force led the allegation categories, followed by Improper Search and Theft. Allegations are not findings.

Three major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025. Garfield PD received a C on the report card, at the 54th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

Written by this site strictly from the figures on this page; every number is cited below.

Officers named in IA cases, 2025

16[1]

Distinct officers in that year's IA investigations, not total staffing

IA investigations, 2025

19[1]

Incidents, 2025

10[1]

Major discipline records

3

All years, 2020-2025

Staffing

As reported by the department to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) census, full-time personnel as of October 31 each year. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure above; see the methodology.

Sworn officers, 2025

69[7]

66 years reported

69 sworn officers in 2025, up from 45 in 1960 (+53%).
Yearsworn officers
196045
196142
196245
196346
196447
196546
196649
196748
196846
196954
197050
197157
197256
197356
197453
197552
197650
197746
197846
197946
198047
198145
198244
198342
198443
198546
198646
198749
198849
198948
199046
199146
199247
199350
199457
199552
199653
199753
199852
199955
200058
200160
200259
200358
200458
200557
200661
200757
200864
200963
201061
201161
201258
201357
201459
201561
201666
201760
201859
201963
202059
202160
202265
202366
202466
202569

Civilian employees, 2025

3[8]

0.04 per sworn officer

Female sworn officers, 2025

10[9]

14.5% of sworn officers

Officers per 1,000 residents, 2025

2.05[10]

Municipal departments only

AnalysisComputed by this site from LEE reported totals; not an official statistic.

How Garfield Police Department's sworn staffing compares with its real peer group (same agency type, similar size band), not an assumed bell curve.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92)

Sworn officers: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–20084
200–4005
400–6001
600–8001
800–10000
1000–12001

Garfield Police Department: 69 sworn officers: 22nd percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=92).

The match between this FBI record and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Officer pay and school-staff pay

County comparison

A separate dataset from the discipline records above: NJ Treasury pension salaries as of March 31, 2026, for the 68 active Garfield Police Department officers in the file.

Median officer salary

$148,392[3]

68 active officers

Median local school staff

$87,300

GARFIELD CITY BD OF ED, 520 TPAF members

Against the local district

1.70x

Median officer to median local school staff

Against the county

1.62x

Median officer to Bergen County school-staff median

AnalysisEvery ratio here is computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries. The local school figure comes from the pension employer "GARFIELD CITY BD OF ED", linked to this municipality only because exactly one district in the county resolves to it. A pay comparison is not a statement about either budget. The full county comparison, including the distribution and the tenure-adjusted figure, is on the Bergen County pay page.

Military surplus equipment (1033 program)

In brief

Written by this site from the figures below.

Garfield Police Department received nine recorded line items of surplus military equipment between 1996 and 2001, all of them under Guns, through 30mm. The total recorded value is $2,325, which is original Department of Defense acquisition cost rather than current or market value, and the category is one this site classes as tactical. The records describe transfers received more than two decades ago, not a current inventory, and non-controlled items may be disposed of after one year. Receiving surplus equipment through the federal program is not misconduct, and this data is separate in origin from the Attorney General discipline records on this page.

Surplus military equipment transferred to this agency under the Defense Department's 1033 program, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Total recorded value

$2,325[2]

Original DoD cost, not market value

Tactical equipment value

$2,325[2]

9 of 9 line items classed tactical

Transfer window

1996-2001[2]

Earliest to latest recorded ship date

Quantities received, by unit of issue: 9 items (Each). Units of issue differ (an item and a kit are not the same thing), so no single combined item count exists.

Top categories by recorded value

Top 1033 equipment categories received by Garfield Police Department, by recorded value (original DoD acquisition cost, dollars)
Guns, through 30mm2,325 tactical

Categories received: tactical vs mundane

Each category is classed tactical or mundane by this site's published classification of its Federal Supply Class. Much of what moves through the program is mundane surplus (tools, office and medical equipment); the tactical rows are what the Militarization Index below measures.

1033 equipment categories received by Garfield Police Department, grouped tactical vs mundane
CategoryClassLine itemsQuantity receivedRecorded value (original cost)
Guns, through 30mmWeapons · FSC 1005Tactical99 items (Each)$2,325

Every recorded transfer

Equipment class

Sort

Filtering only hides rows; every recorded transfer stays in the table below it.

Scroll sideways for more columns →

1033 program transfers recorded for Garfield Police Department, as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency
ItemCategoryQtyRecorded valueOriginal DoD cost
RIFLE,7.62 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-589-1271Shipped 2001-07-06 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$138
RIFLE,7.62 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-589-1271Shipped 2001-07-06 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$138
RIFLE,7.62 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-589-1271Shipped 2001-07-06 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$138
RIFLE,7.62 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-589-1271Shipped 2001-07-06 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$138
RIFLE,7.62 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-589-1271Shipped 2001-07-06 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$138
RIFLE,7.62 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-589-1271Shipped 2001-07-06 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$138
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-073-9421Shipped 1996-07-10 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$499
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-073-9421Shipped 1996-07-10 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$499
RIFLE,5.56 MILLIMETERNSN 1005-00-073-9421Shipped 1996-07-10 · DEMIL DGuns, through 30mm Tactical1 Each$499

9 of 9 recorded transfers shown. Quantities are per unit of issue and are never summed across units. DEMIL code A: non-controlled property, may be disposed of after one year (so a listed item is not necessarily still held). Codes such as C, D, F, and Q: controlled property with federal return or demilitarization requirements.

AnalysisMilitarization Index: computed by this site, not an official statistic.

Garfield Police Department received $34 of tactical 1033 equipment value per sworn officer (original cost, divided by its latest FBI-reported staffing): the 55th percentile among municipal police agencies of similar size (60+ officers, n=93).

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

Tactical 1033 value per sworn officer: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–500075
5000–100009
10000–150006
15000–200002

Garfield Police Department: 34 dollars of tactical 1033 acquisition value per sworn officer: 55th percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

A higher index is not automatically worse. It divides cumulative transfers over the covered window by current staffing, so it measures how intensively an agency has participated in the program, not what it holds today. See the methodology.

Statewide totals, per-county rollups, and the top categories across all of New Jersey are on the 1033 program overview.

Internal affairs investigations by year

counts

Internal affairs investigations reported by Garfield Police Department, by year
Categorycounts
20216
20229
202313
20247
202519

Incidents

10 in 2025

Internal affairs incidents reported by Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20216
20227
20238
20245
202510

Officers on IA rows

19 in 2025

Officers listed on the officer-level internal affairs rows for Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
2021not reported
2022not reported
2023not reported
20247
202519
Analysis

Computed by this site from the two figures the agency reports each year. Not a misconduct rate: it describes how an agency resolved what it investigated.

share of total · 5 reported years

Share of internal affairs investigations sustained by Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearshare of total
20210
202222.222
202315.385
202414.286
202515.789

Statewide, 19.5 percent of investigations reported a sustained complaint in 2025. How dispositions break down statewide.

Complaint mix, 2025

Most serious allegation per investigation, as categorized by the reporting agency. Officer-level rows list 19 officers involved.

Most serious allegation

Most serious allegations reported by Garfield Police Department, 2025
Excessive Force7
Improper Search3
Theft2
Other Departmental Rule Violation2
False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal)1
False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Criminal)1
Other Criminal Violation1
Neglect of Duty1
AdministrativeConduct / dutyRights / integrityViolence / criminal

Statewide category pages: Excessive Force · Improper Search · Theft · Other Departmental Rule Violation · False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Non-Criminal) · False Documentation/Falsifying A Report (Criminal) · Other Criminal Violation · Neglect of Duty

Internal disposition

Internal dispositions reported by Garfield Police Department, 2025
not provided7
Exonerated6
Not Sustained3
Sustained3

Allegations by year, 2021 to 2025

AnalysisRanked and folded by this site. The counts inside each panel are as reported.

Other Departmental Rule Violation

14 of 54

Other Departmental Rule Violation allegations reported by Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20213
20226
20230
20243
20252

Excessive Force

9 of 54

Excessive Force allegations reported by Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20231
20241
20257

Demeanor

5 of 54

Demeanor allegations reported by Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20212
20220
20233
20240
20250

Improper Arrest

5 of 54

Improper Arrest allegations reported by Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20210
20220
20235
20240
20250

Other (10 categories)

21 of 54

Other (10 categories) allegations reported by Garfield Police Department, by year
Yearcounts
20211
20223
20234
20243
202510

Against peers, 2025

How this grade was built →
Internal affairs investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers, 2025 (investigations per 100 IA-investigated officers)
Garfield Police Department118.8
County median, municipal police (60)125.3
NJ median, municipal police (445)125.9

Investigations per 100 officers named in that year's IA investigations (the Attorney General's own "Number of Officers" field, a distinct-officer count drawn from the IA case data itself, not a department headcount). A higher number is ambiguous on its own: it can reflect more misconduct, or a stronger internal reporting culture. Medians are computed within the same agency type only.

AnalysisA second, independent rate using FBI-reported staffing instead.

19 investigations reported for 2025[1] ÷ 69 sworn officers the department reported to the FBI for 2025[22] = 27.5 per 100 FBI-reported sworn officers. This is a genuinely different denominator from the rate above, not a correction of it; the two should not be added or averaged together. See the methodology for why these two officer counts diverge.

Report card

Grade C: Middle fifth of peers

On reported IA volume and discipline severity; see methodology

Combined standing
54th percentile of 93 peers
Confidence
Medium confidence
  • small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases

Where this agency falls among its peers

The actual spread of discipline severity across Garfield Police Department's real peer group, not an assumed bell curve. If the group is skewed, it is shown skewed.

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93)

Discipline severity: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–5066
50–10025
100–1501
150–2001

Garfield Police Department: 60 severity-weighted discipline per 100 IA-investigated officers: 82nd percentile among Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=93).

How the grade is built

Three components, each a percentile within the peer group. The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in.

IA volumeweight 40%

2nd percentileof 93 peers

105.4 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)

Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.

Discipline severityweight 40%

82nd percentileof 93 peers

60.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025

Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.

Allegation severityweight 20%

94th percentileof 93 peers

2.52 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)

Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.

What this grade can and can't tell you

  • The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
  • Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
  • There is no arrest or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate. A genuinely independent staffing-based rate, sourced from the FBI rather than this grade's own data, appears above when available. It is a different measurement, not a more accurate version of the grade.
  • A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
  • The grade is one lens. The records it reads are on this page above.

Where this agency ranks

AnalysisRankings compare agencies of the same type only, on figures as reported. A high rank is reported volume, not a verdict.[23] How each metric is defined.
This agency's rank on each metric, among agencies of the same type
MetricValueRank
IA per 100 investigated officers2025118.8273rd of 445 municipal police
IA investigations202519117th of 445 municipal police
IA incidents202510181st of 445 municipal police
Major discipline2020-2025387th of 282 municipal police
Militarization Indexas of 2026-06-30$34143rd of 163 municipal police
Sworn per 1,000 residentslatest reported census year2.05304th of 460 municipal police
Police pay vs school paypension snapshot 2026-03-311.62x81st of 415 municipal police
OPRA requests recordedOPRAmachine, 2017 to present21172nd of 458 municipal police

Major discipline records

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.
Yearmajor discipline records
20200
20210
20220
20231
20241
20251

1 major discipline records in 2025, up from 0 in 2020.

Major discipline records reported by Garfield Police Department, 2020-2025
YearOfficerRankSanction as reportedSrc
2025Lukasz ChmielewskiPolice OfficerSuspended 7 days[24]
2024Jonathan LibrizziPolice OfficerSuspended 8 days[25]
2023Charles Galbo IIIOfficerSuspended 20 days[26]

Every name links to the officer's record page with the agency's full synopsis and citation.

Public records requests

Records requests about this department filed through OPRAmachine, an independent site that files Open Public Records Act requests in public and publishes the responses.[4] This is a third-party, user-generated source, separate in origin from the Attorney General records elsewhere on this page.

Current as of 12 July 2026. These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and do not update: requests filed to OPRAmachine after that date do not appear here. For live activity, see this body on OPRAmachine.

This department has no separate listing on OPRAmachine. Records requests for it are handled through Garfield City, the municipal records custodian, which also fields requests about permits, property, and code enforcement. Only the 21 requests whose subject line indicates it concerns the police department are counted below. The other 123 filed to Garfield City are about something else and are not shown.

Police-related requests

21[4]

Identified by subject line, of 144 filed to Garfield City

Most recent request

June 2026[4]

First recorded May 2020

Awaiting a response

15[4]

Requests with no response recorded yet

What happened to those requests

Statuses as recorded on OPRAmachine. They are set by the person who filed the request when they classify what came back, not by the agency and not by any court. They describe the fate of a records request and nothing else.

Recorded outcomes of police-related records requests to Garfield City (requests)
Awaiting agency response15
Delivery error3
Needs site administrator2
Request refused1

Recent requests

The 12 most recent police-related requests to Garfield City, by date and recorded status. Each was written by a member of the public. A request is a question somebody asked. It is not a finding, not an allegation this site makes, and not evidence that anything happened.

  1. 2026-06-29Awaiting agency response
  2. 2026-01-19Awaiting agency response
  3. 2025-10-05Awaiting agency response
  4. 2025-09-13Awaiting agency response
  5. 2025-07-13Awaiting agency response
  6. 2025-05-31Awaiting agency response
  7. 2025-03-28Request refused
  8. 2024-07-31Awaiting agency response
  9. 2024-04-18Delivery error
  10. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  11. 2023-08-31Awaiting agency response
  12. 2023-07-07Delivery error
Show what each request asked for, as the requester wrote it

These titles are quoted from OPRAmachine exactly as the requester typed them. They are the requester's words, not this site's, and some describe what the requester believed or suspected. Nothing here has been established as fact.

File your own records request

Anyone can request records from this municipality under the Open Public Records Act. This link opens a request on OPRAmachine, pre-filled with a neutral starting point you can edit or replace before you send it. The request, and any response, will be published there.

File an OPRA request about this department

See every request filed to Garfield City on OPRAmachine.

What this section can and can't tell you

  • A request is not a finding. Every entry records what a member of the public asked for. None of it establishes that an agency did anything, and none of it is an allegation this site is making.
  • Statuses come from the requester, not the agency. On OPRAmachine the person who filed the request classifies the response they got, so “successful” means they said they got what they asked for. It is not the agency's word and not an adjudication.
  • Request volume is not a measure of misconduct. A long list usually reflects public interest, local journalism, or one determined requester. A short list usually means few people have asked.
  • This covers OPRAmachine only. Most OPRA requests in New Jersey are filed directly with agencies and never appear here, so this is a floor, not a total.
  • It is frozen at 12 July 2026. The figures come from a snapshot of OPRAmachine taken on that date and nothing refreshes them, so anything filed since is missing. Treat every number here as a lower bound that is only getting further out of date.
  • The count is an undercount, by design. Requests to Garfield City are sorted by subject line, because that custodian also handles permits, property, and code enforcement. A request that is genuinely about the police but carries a vague subject line, and many do read only “OPRA Request,” is not counted here. The sorting is this site's own reading of the request titles, not a fact from the source, and it is deliberately cautious: it would rather miss a police request than show you somebody's building permit.

The match between this OPRAmachine body and this department is this site's inference, not a certified mapping. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Questions and answers

What is a summary of Garfield Police Department's internal affairs and discipline record?

Garfield Police Department is a municipal police agency in Bergen County. It named 16 officers in internal affairs cases in 2025 and reported 19 investigations, a rate of 118.8 per 100 officers, below the Bergen County median of 125.3 and the statewide municipal median of 125.9. A lighter internal affairs docket can mean less misconduct or a narrower practice of recording complaints. Of the 19 investigations detailed for 2025, 3 reported sustained complaints. Excessive Force led the allegation categories, followed by Improper Search and Theft. Allegations are not findings. Three major discipline records appear across the 2020-2025 releases, from 2023, 2024 and 2025. Garfield PD received a C on the report card, at the 54th percentile among 93 peers in the 60+ officers group, a medium-confidence grade.

How many internal affairs investigations did Garfield Police Department report in 2025?

Garfield Police Department reported 19 internal affairs investigations in 2025, according to New Jersey Attorney General data. 16 distinct officers were named in that year's IA investigations.

How many major discipline records does Garfield Police Department have?

Garfield Police Department has 3 major discipline records in the Attorney General's 2020-2025 releases, of which 0 were terminations. These are final, adjudicated actions, not allegations.

How many officers does Garfield Police Department have?

Garfield Police Department reported 69 full-time sworn officers to the FBI's Law Enforcement Employees census for 2025, 14.5% of them female. That is 2.05 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. This is a different measurement from the "officers named in IA cases" figure elsewhere on this page, which counts distinct officers in that year's internal affairs investigations, not total staffing.

What military surplus equipment has Garfield Police Department received through the 1033 program?

Garfield Police Department received 9 recorded line items of surplus military equipment through the Defense Department's 1033 program between 1996 and 2001, with a total recorded value of $2,325 (original DoD acquisition cost, not current or market value). The largest category by recorded value was: Guns, through 30mm. Transfers are as recorded by the Defense Logistics Agency as of 2026-06-30; equipment acquired through the program is not necessarily still held.

What is the total recorded value of the 1033 equipment Garfield Police Department received?

The surplus equipment recorded for Garfield Police Department under the 1033 program totals $2,325 in original DoD acquisition cost, of which $2,325 is in categories this site classes as tactical (9 of 9 line items). These are original-cost figures at the time of transfer, not current or market value.

What does Garfield Police Department pay its officers compared with local school staff?

The median pensionable salary for the 68 active Garfield Police Department officers in the NJ Treasury pension file is $148,392. The median for the 520 TPAF-enrolled staff at GARFIELD CITY BD OF ED is $87,300, a ratio of 1.70x. Against the Bergen County school-staff median the ratio is 1.62x. These are pensionable base salaries: they exclude overtime, stipends, longevity and leave payouts for both groups, and a school contract year and a police work year are different lengths. TPAF covers certificated school staff, not only classroom teachers.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2078. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  2. [2]DoD 1033 Program transfers (LESO Public Information), New Jersey sheet. Defense Logistics Agency (U.S. Department of Defense). LESO Public Information: DISP_AllStatesAndTerritories, quarterly file as of 2026-06-30; recorded ship dates 1993-2026. Retrieved 2026-07-10. https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Public-Information/ ↩
  3. [3]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset) and YourMoney Active Pension Members (TPAF subset, names removed). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Both snapshots as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. Figures are computed by this site from as-reported pensionable salaries; the row-by-row account of what entered each figure is published at /data/pay-comparison.json. ↩
  4. [4]Records-request activity for Garfield City. OPRAmachine (opramachine.com), an independent public-records platform. Publicly visible requests only. Point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-07-12 from a database export dated 2026-07-11. Not updated after that date; see opramachine.com for current activity. ↩
  5. [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Officers, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Officer counts summed across every Garfield PD row. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  6. [6]New Jersey county boundaries. New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). NJ_Counties_3857 (FeatureServer layer 0), https://services2.arcgis.com/XVOqAjTOJ5P6ngMu/arcgis/rest/services/NJ_Counties_3857/FeatureServer/0. 2020 boundary delineation. Retrieved 2026-07-27. Boundaries are generalized for display. This data set is not a survey document and must not be used as such. The polygons do not represent legal boundaries.
  7. [7]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8150. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  8. [8]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8150. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  9. [9]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8150. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  10. [10]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8150. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  11. [11]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 43. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  12. [12]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1059. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  13. [13]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1572. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  14. [14]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 549. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  15. [15]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2078. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
  16. [16]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Garfield PD row for 2025; row 1 is the header. ↩
  17. [17]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Garfield PD row for 2021. ↩
  18. [18]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Garfield PD row for 2022. ↩
  19. [19]New Jersey Internal Affairs Data Download, 2021-2023. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Garfield PD row for 2023. ↩
  20. [20]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Garfield PD row for 2024. ↩
  21. [21]New Jersey Internal Affairs Investigations, 2024-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. Aggregated from every Garfield PD row for 2025. ↩
  22. [22]FBI Law Enforcement Employees (LEE), New Jersey subset. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Row 8150. Derived from the public Law Enforcement Employees (LEE) / Police Employee Data dataset (1960-2025), https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/. ↩
  23. [23]Ranks computed by this site over the Attorney General internal affairs agency totals and major discipline releases, within agency type. Each ranking page lists every agency and its source rows. ↩
  24. [24]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 75. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  25. [25]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 877. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
  26. [26]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1506. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩