Report card
New Jersey Institute Of Technology
Not graded: too few peers
Fewer than 8 comparable agencies (all other agencies); a percentile grade would be noise.
- Peer group
- Other agency, all other agencies (6 agencies)
- Confidence
- Medium confidence
- small agency; per-officer rates swing widely on a handful of cases
How the grade is built
Three components, each a percentile within the peer group (higher = more reported volume or severity). The combined standing is their weighted mean, re-ranked among peers; the grade is the fifth of the peer group it lands in. Weights are an editorial choice, published on the methodology page.
IA volumeweight 40%
133.2 investigations per 100 officers (multi-year mean)
Internal affairs investigations per 100 reported officers, averaged over the years where the agency reported both figures.
Discipline severityweight 40%
0.0 severity-weighted discipline per 100 officers, 2020-2025
Major discipline records weighted by sanction (termination 4, demotion 3, suspension 2, other 1) per 100 officers.
Allegation severityweight 20%
2.38 mean severity tier (1 low - 4 critical)
Mean severity tier of IA allegations across 2021-2025, using the published tier map; unknown values excluded.
Volume trend
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 123.1 | 115.8 | 150 | 176.9 |
Investigations per 100 reported officers, per year.[2][3][4][5][6]
The inputs, on the record
Sworn officers, 2025
13[1]
IA investigations, 2025
23[1]
Major discipline records
0
All years, 2020-2025
Terminations
0
All years, 2020-2025
| New Jersey Institute Of Technology | 176.9 |
|---|---|
| County median, other agency (1) | 176.9 |
| NJ median, other agency (4) | 121.6 |
What this grade can and can't tell you
- The underlying data is self-reported by agencies, one yearly snapshot at a time.
- Allegations are not findings; many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
- There is no arrest, population, or call-volume denominator in this data, so nothing here is a per-capita misconduct rate.
- A higher internal affairs volume is ambiguous: it can indicate more misconduct, or a more robust oversight and reporting culture. The grade weighs it anyway, because volume is what the record offers; that choice is published, not hidden.
- The grade is one lens. Weights are a transparent editorial choice on the methodology page, and the records are always one click away.
Questions and answers
- What is New Jersey Institute Of Technology's police report card grade?
- New Jersey Institute Of Technology is not graded on this site: there are too few comparable agencies to place it fairly among peers. The underlying records are still shown.
- How is the report-card grade calculated?
- The grade combines three components, each ranked within a peer group of the same agency type and size: internal affairs volume per officer (40%), sanction-weighted discipline severity (40%), and mean allegation severity (20%). The combined standing is re-ranked among peers, and the grade is the fifth of the peer group it falls in. Full method and weights are on the methodology page.
Sources
- [1]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2224. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [2]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 195. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [3]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1209. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [4]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 1718. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [5]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 701. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩
- [6]New Jersey Internal Affairs Agency Totals, 2021-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Sheet1", row 2224. Snapshot retrieved 2026-06-09. ↩