Officer record · As reported by the employing agency

David Preziosi

West Orange Police Department · 1 record · 2023

About this data

Records on this page come from the Attorney General's major discipline releases: final, post-appeal discipline as reported by the employing agency. They are sustained charges, not allegations.
All figures are self-reported by agencies to the New Jersey Attorney General and shown as reported. Blank fields read "not reported," never "no."
Data is a yearly snapshot. Cases are not tracked across years, and major discipline appears only in the year it became final after all appeals.
In internal affairs data, allegations are not findings: many complaints end unfounded, exonerated, or not sustained.
Any compensation figure below comes from New Jersey Treasury pension data, a separate source from the discipline records. It is matched to this officer by name and employing agency at high confidence, not by certified identity.

Full caveats and definitions: methodology. To request a correction against the official record: corrections.

Major discipline · 2023^[1]

Suspended 60 days

Rank as reported: Officer
Sustained charge(s)
Separated while IA pending: No

Plain-language summary (this site, from the cited record only)

Officer David Preziosi was suspended for 60 days by the West Orange Police Department in 2023. An internal investigation of his actions during a residential burglary and motor vehicle theft investigation found that Preziosi conducted an improper investigation and failed to properly document the incident, including failing to notify his supervisor and detective bureau personnel. He drafted 3 separate incident reports that gave contradictory accounts of the facts and was evasive and showed a lack of candor with supervisors. The sustained charge was neglect of duty.

Synopsis as reported by the agency

An internal investigation of Officer Preziosi's actions during a Residential Burglary / Motor Vehicle Theft investigation revealed that the officer conducted an improper investigation and failed to properly document the incident. Specifically by failing to properly notify his supervisor and Detective bureau personnel of the inicdnet and conducting a poor investigation of the scene for information/evidence. Additionally, the officer drafted 3 separate incident reports consisting of contradictory accounting of the facts and was evasive and showed a lack of candor with supervisors when they attempted to obtain accurate information from him.

Compensation and pension

Active member · NJ Treasury YourMoney^[2]

This site: records-based match

Base salary (pension basis): $120,521
Pension fund: Police and Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS)
Reported years of service: 17 years

How to read this

The amount is as reported by the New Jersey Department of the Treasury in its YourMoney pension data, as of March 31, 2026. It is the pension-basis figure and may not include overtime, accrued leave, stipends, or other pay. The link between this officer and this pension record is a records-based match at high confidence (exact name and exact employing agency), not a certified identity. If it is wrong, we will remove it: corrections.

Sources

[1]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1680. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. ↩
[2]YourMoney Active Pension Members (PFRS/SPRS subset). New Jersey Department of the Treasury. Row 222541, snapshot as of March 31, 2026. Derived from the public YourMoney Active Pension Members dataset, https://www.yourmoney.nj.gov/. ↩