Skip to content
POLICE TRANSPARENCY NJInternal Affairs & Discipline Records

Category view · All years, 2020-2025

Major discipline records, 2020-2025, by type and size

AnalysisGroups are never compared as equivalent across type or size band. Correctional agencies, for instance, naturally have different volume patterns than municipal police; each distribution describes only its own peers.

Compare two or more groups

Pick two or more groups above to compare them side by side.

Corrections (all agencies)n=13

Peer group: Corrections (all agencies) (n=13)

110–2001200–4001400–600
Corrections (all agencies): median 36.0 records, range 1.0-577.0, across 13 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: Corrections (all agencies)
RangeAgencies
0–20011
200–4001
400–6001

Median 36.0 · range 1.0–577.0 · n=13

County prosecutor (all agencies)n=16

Peer group: County prosecutor (all agencies) (n=16)

60–292–44–66–818–10
County prosecutor (all agencies): median 2.0 records, range 1.0-10.0, across 16 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: County prosecutor (all agencies)
RangeAgencies
0–26
2–49
4–60
6–80
8–101

Median 2.0 · range 1.0–10.0 · n=16

County sheriff (all agencies)n=17

Peer group: County sheriff (all agencies) (n=17)

110–10210–20320–3030–40140–50
County sheriff (all agencies): median 8.0 records, range 2.0-47.0, across 17 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: County sheriff (all agencies)
RangeAgencies
0–1011
10–202
20–303
30–400
40–501

Median 8.0 · range 2.0–47.0 · n=17

Municipal police, 1-14 officersn=165

Peer group: Municipal police, 1-14 officers (n=165)

750–2702–4174–616–818–10110–12
Municipal police, 1-14 officers: median 2.0 records, range 1.0-12.0, across 165 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: Municipal police, 1-14 officers
RangeAgencies
0–275
2–470
4–617
6–81
8–101
10–121

Median 2.0 · range 1.0–12.0 · n=165

Municipal police, 15-29 officersn=48

Peer group: Municipal police, 15-29 officers (n=48)

80–2152–4134–666–868–10
Municipal police, 15-29 officers: median 4.0 records, range 1.0-10.0, across 48 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: Municipal police, 15-29 officers
RangeAgencies
0–28
2–415
4–613
6–86
8–106

Median 4.0 · range 1.0–10.0 · n=48

Municipal police, 30-59 officersn=36

Peer group: Municipal police, 30-59 officers (n=36)

190–595–10610–15215–20
Municipal police, 30-59 officers: median 4.0 records, range 1.0-19.0, across 36 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: Municipal police, 30-59 officers
RangeAgencies
0–519
5–109
10–156
15–202

Median 4.0 · range 1.0–19.0 · n=36

Municipal police, 60+ officersn=14

Peer group: Municipal police, 60+ officers (n=14)

90–20120–40240–6060–80280–100
Municipal police, 60+ officers: median 16.5 records, range 10.0-92.0, across 14 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: Municipal police, 60+ officers
RangeAgencies
0–209
20–401
40–602
60–800
80–1002

Median 16.5 · range 10.0–92.0 · n=14

State agency (all agencies)n=8

Peer group: State agency (all agencies) (n=8)

70–5050–1001100–150
State agency (all agencies): median 7.5 records, range 4.0-106.0, across 8 agencies.
Major discipline records, 2020-2025: State agency (all agencies)
RangeAgencies
0–507
50–1000
100–1501

Median 7.5 · range 4.0–106.0 · n=8

Metric definition. Row count per agency across 2020-2025. A record is one disciplinary action; officers can appear more than once.[1]

Read with care. Groups smaller than 8 agencies are omitted entirely rather than shown as an unreliable distribution, matching the same floor the report-card engine uses.

Sources

  1. [1]New Jersey Major Discipline Data, 2020-2025. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. Sheet "Major Discipline Data", row 1. Snapshot retrieved 2026-07-03. Computed from each agency’s rows across 2020-2025; row 1 is the header. ↩